Iran: “We Want To Talk To More Important People”

July 25th, 2007 Posted By Pat Dollard.

knlkn

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Iran would like higher-level talks with the United States regarding security in Iraq, the official Islamic Republic News Agency reported Wednesday.

The report came a day after the American and Iranian ambassadors to Iraq met in Baghdad and agreed to set up a security subcommittee to carry forward talks on restoring stability in the wartorn nation.

“The issue of negotiations between Iran and the U.S. about Iraq at the level of deputy foreign ministers is reviewable,” the agency quoted Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki as saying after a cabinet meeting in Tehran.

Mottaki said that “necessary studies will be undertaken” in case a “formal request” is made by the U.S. for new, higher-level talks on Iraq.

Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said after the talks in Baghdad that experts would meet as early as Wednesday to work out the structure and mechanism of the committee.

“We hope that the next round of talks will be on a higher level if progress is made,” he said at a news conference after the talks.

But underscoring the rising tensions between the two foes, U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker reiterated accusations that Iran is fueling the violence in Iraq by arming and training Shiite militias. He warned that no progress could be made unless Iranian actions change on the ground.

Iranian Ambassador Hassan Kazemi Qomi countered that Tehran was helping Iraq deal with the security situation but that Iraqis were “victimized by terror and the presence of foreign forces” on their territory.

He said Tuesday his delegation also demanded the release of five Iranians detained by U.S. forces in Iraq. The United States has said the five were linked to Iran’s elite Quds Force, which it has accused of arming and training Iraqi militants. Iran says the five are diplomats who were legally in Iraq.

Iraq’s fragile government has been pressing for more contacts between the two nations with the greatest influence over its future, and Iran has repeatedly signaled its willingness to sit down.

Iran holds considerable sway in Iraq, where the majority of the population is also Shiite Muslim and where many Shiite political parties are seen as having ties to Tehran.

The United States broke off diplomatic ties with the Islamic republic following the 1979 storming of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and the holding of American hostages for 444 days.


    • Young Americans Documentary
    • Learn More About Pat
    • blogroll

      • A Soldier's Perspective
      • American Soldier
      • Ann Coulter
      • Attack Machine
      • Bill Ardolino
      • Bill Roggio
      • Black Five
      • Blonde Sagacity
      • Breitbart
      • Chicagoray
      • Confederate Yankee
      • Day by Day Cartoon
      • Euphoric Reality
      • Flopping Aces
      • Free Republic
      • Frontier Web Design
      • Hot Air
      • Hugh Hewitt
      • Ian Schwartz
      • Instapundit
      • Little Green Footballs
      • Matt Sanchez
      • Michael Fumento
      • Michael Yon
      • Michelle Malkin
      • Military.com
      • Missiles And Stilletos
      • Move America Forward
      • Mudville Gazette
      • Pass The Ammo
      • Roger L. Simon
      • Sportsman's Outfit
      • Stop The ACLU
      • TCOverride
      • The Belmont Club
      • The Big God Blog
      • The Crimson Blog
      • The Daily Gut
      • The Drudge Report
      • The PoliTicking Timebomb
      • The Pundit Review

16 Responses

  1. Uncle Sam

    USA: We want to talk to people that dont play for time and talk BS.

  2. terry smyth

    The diplomatic talks with these murderers is a total wast of time. They only negotiate to bide time to launch more attacks on the west.A bit of the old British gunboat diplomacy is in order here.
    In the days when the British Empire was an empire, if the natives were restless, up sailed a gunboat and flattenend a few towns.Negotiations then proceeded with the outcome a foregone conclusion.
    A bit more of this kind of diplomacy and there wouldnt be the b/s that we see every day form the ME.
    Time to get REALLY TOUGH with the ingrates.
    They think that they can kill the coalition soldiers with impunity. Get fuckt.Make an example: 1 soldier killed: 1 city in Iran smoked.
    1 Humvee IED, 7 dead soldiers: 10 citied smoked.
    The message, although slow to get through will get through. Try this

  3. terry smyth

    Added: Just remember these muthfukrs would decimate any US city without a single thought.
    Idea: monitor CAIR to see if they are advising their member to get out of a city somewhere.Then be afraid, very afraid, and prepare to show the same restaint. NONE.
    This aint a pixy sqabble, its a fight to the death,Theirs.NOT ours

  4. Steve in NC

    how about you talk to Bozo the Clown you hell bound goat fuckers

  5. Dan(The Infidel)

    And what would that solve Iran? You towel heads are just playing the Democrum headfuck game of obfuscation, delay and lying. Fuck you. Go back to your hole.

  6. WarBicycle

    How about the pilot of a B1 bomber carrying a nuke?

  7. Steven D

    I hear that Barak Obama will meet with them.

  8. skip1

    Mullahs must have heard Barack Obama at the Dems presidential debates saying that he would meet & talk to all our enemy leaders (Iran, Syria, N. Korea, Venezuela, etc) with no conditions in his first year as president. I bet afterward, Obama would give each one of them a hug, so special.

  9. 0311inohio

    How about a platoon of marine corps grunts with automatic weapons at the ready? Pretty fuckin important people to me! :smile:

  10. Lamplighter

    So our Ambassador isn’t high enough for the Iranians. I guess they’ve learned through our media and dem politicians that they need to talk to the real authorities, Nancy Peloski, Harry Reidski and their crowd.

  11. Michael A. Davis

    Look, I told everyone the answer to this problem a long time ago.

    To those who didn’t listen, let me say it again…

    1) Leave minimal troop coverage in Afghanistan and Iraq.

    2) Port three aircraft carrier armadas off of Iran’s coast.

    3) Going in a west to east fashion, reduce to rubble everything in Iran that has ANYTHING to do with their military and/or government.

    4) After the two weeks of “fighting”, pull back out of Iran and let the loony mullahs and imams and young freedom idealists fight for control of the country.

    Problem solved.

  12. MikeP

    If you want to talk, you talk to the person we send you. And he is more than you shitheads deserve. I swear I don’t know why we are still willing to talk to these assholes. Send them some airmail that explodes.

  13. ATL-LE

    When did the Iranians get to be so important that they decide who and when they speak to them. It’s unfortunate that we didn’t start the party there first. They still owe us for a bunch of crap.

    But then again we could just give them what they want because they are Persians, not Arabs.

  14. Clyde Conneer

    Told ya to set the Iranian formed penetrator mines on the table, aim the at the towel heads, arm them, then say “OK, I am authorized to deal with you as I see fit.”

  15. BRUNO

    HIGHER LEVEL TALKS???? SOUNDS LIKE THE U.S.A.F. :evil:

  16. David Of One

    The PROCTOLOGIST to the President is probably available. :idea: :oops:

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen::neutral::twisted::arrow::shock::smile::???::cool::evil::grin::idea::oops::razz::roll::wink::cry::eek::lol::mad::sad::!::?::beer: