$2 Million Ransom Paid For Hostages

August 31st, 2007 Posted By Pat Dollard.

ksdvb

Al Jazeera’s report of $20 million is ridiculous, since the Taliban have long been on record of only asking for just under $10 million. And the Koreans had already offered $500K, and refused to budge for a week, so $2m sounds like just about where this negotian would’ve ended up. I’m sure the Koreans didn’t just decide to pay a “thank you” bonus. But that’s Al Jazeera, doing all they can to bring glory to terrorists around the world.

Times Of India:

TOKYO: South Korea paid two million dollars to Taliban extremists in Afghanistan to secure the release of 19 hostages, a Japanese newspaper reported on Friday.

Citing unidentified sources in Afghanistan, the respected Asahi Shimbun said Afghan mediators persuaded South Korea’s ambassador in Kabul that there was no other way to end the six-week kidnap ordeal.

“Two million dollars were paid to release all 19 people,” an Afghan mediator was quoted as telling the influential Japanese daily.

The Asahi Shimbun said both a South Korean official and a Taliban spokesman contacted by the newspaper denied any payment.

The Taliban, who earlier killed two of the hostages, freed the 19 Christian aid workers this week after South Korea promised to withdraw its military from Afghanistan as planned and ban missionary groups from the Islamic country.

South Korean officials have not commented on whether a payment was made to any party to help secure the release.

Asked about the Asahi report, a presidential spokesman said on Friday that there had been no discussions with the Taliban apart from those on the troop withdrawal and the missionary issue.

The foreign ministers of Afghanistan and Canada have criticised South Korea for negotiating directly with the insurgents, saying it could embolden them.

The Taliban had initially demanded the release of captured fighters from Afghan jails in return for the hostages’ lives, but the government in Kabul refused.


    • Young Americans Documentary
    • Learn More About Pat
    • blogroll

      • A Soldier's Perspective
      • Ace Of Spades
      • American Soldier
      • Ann Coulter
      • Attack Machine
      • Awesome Web Design
      • Bill Ardolino
      • Bill Roggio
      • Black Five
      • Blonde Sagacity
      • Breitbart
      • Chicagoray
      • Confederate Yankee
      • Day by Day Cartoon
      • Euphoric Reality
      • Flopping Aces
      • Free Republic
      • Frontier Web Design
      • Hot Air
      • Hugh Hewitt
      • Ian Schwartz
      • Instapundit
      • Jules Crittenden
      • Little Green Footballs
      • Matt Sanchez
      • Michael Fumento
      • Michael Yon
      • Michelle Malkin
      • Military.com
      • Missiles And Stilletos
      • Move America Forward
      • Mudville Gazette
      • Pass The Ammo
      • Protest Warrior
      • Roger L. Simon
      • Sportsman's Outfit
      • Stop The ACLU
      • TCOverride
      • The Belmont Club
      • The Big God Blog
      • The Crimson Blog
      • The Daily Gut
      • The Drudge Report
      • The PoliTicking Timebomb
      • The Pundit Review
      • Veteran's Affairs Documentary

7 Responses

  1. FTL

    nothing should have been offered… in fact 2m should have been given to our troops as reward for killing the extremists.

  2. Sandy K.

    That is just so wrong. . . 2 mil to the Taliban so they
    can kill more innocent people and our troops. :mad: :sad:

    “The foreign ministers of Afghanistan and Canada have criticised South Korea for negotiating directly with the insurgents, saying it could embolden them.”

    it could?

    Call it what it is - open season with no limits.

  3. Kelson Stewart

    I agree with both of you. Fund the source of the problem :evil:

  4. Dan (The Infidel)

    Never negotiate with terrorists. It’s a sign of weakness and they’ll do it again to someone else…and ask for more in return, the next time. The only negotiation with terrorist should be at the report end of an M-16.

  5. Sandy K.

    Dan(The Infidel)

    The only negotiation with terrorist should be at the report end of an M-16.

    I could not agree more.

  6. Cridhe Saorsa

    They won’t get to spend it. Their day of reckoning comes.

  7. Future0311

    It should be at the report end of an M-14. 7.62×51mm NATO for the win.

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen::neutral::twisted::arrow::shock::smile::???::cool::evil::grin::idea::oops::razz::roll::wink::cry::eek::lol::mad::sad::!::?::beer::beer: