Iran: “We Have 600 Missiles Pointed At Israel” - US Iraq Bases Also Targeted
Six hundred Iranian Shihab-3 missiles are pointed at targets throughout Israel, and will be launched if either Iran or Syria are attacked, an Iranian website affiliated with the regime reported on Monday.
“Iran will shoot at Israel 600 missiles if it is attacked,” the Iranian news website, Assar Iran, reported. “600 missiles will only be the first reaction.”
According to the report, dozens of locations throughout Iraq, which are being used by the US Army, have also been targeted.
The Shihab missile has a range of 1,300 km, and can reach anywhere in Israel.
On Sunday, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said that the nuclear Iranian crisis forces the world “to prepare for the worst,” and said that in this case it “is war.”
Kouchner emphasized, however, that negotiations should still be the preferred course of action.
Kouchner, quoted by French daily Le Figaro, added that “Iran does whatever it pleases in Iraq … one cannot find in the entire world a crisis greater than this one.”
In response to Kouchner’s comments, Iran’s state-owned news agency accused France of pandering to the interests of the United States.
“The new occupants of the Elysee (Presidential palace) want to copy the White House,” the IRNA news agency said in an editorial. The editorial added that French President Nicolas Sarkozy was taking on “an American skin.”
Kouchner’s statements came just hours after US Defense Secretary Robert Gates reiterated the Bush administration’s commitment, at least for the time being, to using diplomatic and economic means to counter the potential nuclear threat from Iran.
Let um fly. We have over 60,000 with your name written all over them.
September 17th, 2007 at 10:38 amSure they have those missles, but they aren’t smart enough to use them properly. they are to dumb to shoot them straight.
September 17th, 2007 at 10:40 amIsrael has one 200KT missile aimed at them.
Checkmate…
September 17th, 2007 at 10:41 amWell, I guess its go time goatfuckers.
Encyclopedia 2008 – Iran was once a habited land and is now a vast wasteland used by scientists for large scale environmental analysis.
September 17th, 2007 at 10:47 amPolitical scientist Joe Blow said that there is much to learn from Iran other than just the physical aspects of the aftermath. What he would term as delusional aspects of Iran’s last President had a great deal to do with what has transpired. …
Israel has nukes. Fine. Iran will get obliterated. No doubt about that. But what would be left of israel after 600 chemical warheads rain down?
Another war in the Middle East would only have losers, no winners. Unfortunately this war is pretty much inevitable.
Oh and Ron. They dont just have missiles, they MAKE them. Never underestimate the enemy.
September 17th, 2007 at 10:50 amcheckmate hell,, hit em now b4 the game begins…i used to tip the table over and punch my brother in the nose b4 his first move,,,mom would send me to bed without supper but i always ate more the next day and my brother never asked to play again..
September 17th, 2007 at 10:58 amdad 3/7 … that’s how I learned the game too …
Overwhelm and win fast.
September 17th, 2007 at 11:08 amGame over and thanks for playing.
Next!?
I’ve seen reports that the average Iranian is not real thrilled with the “Supreme Leader” sales tax of 6% that goes directly into the Supreme leaders account…that and other big money holders are now moving out of the country. Hmmm, could they be getting some nest eggs started after they piss the rest of the world off and abandon their people like the cowards they are? I’ve also heard they are torturing their labor union leaders for asking support from the UN. Why not listen to Jimmy Hoffa Jr, and infuse a shit pot of support to their unions and other secular institutions like we did with Lex Valesa (sp?) that electrician in Poland that brought a regime down?
September 17th, 2007 at 11:12 amWow Iran MAKES missiles. Big whoop. So does the US. It’d be kind of hard to lauch 600 missiles after all of their lauch facilities, infastructure, and military-industrial base is a pile of twisted steel and concrete.
Iran has been fucking around with the US since 1979. I suggest these fucktards get a grip on reality, before they find out first-hand what shock and awe looks like.
Feeling the luv yet?
And they claim they can dish out more pain? Oh like they have in Lebanon, Israel and in Iraq? And what else is new?
Iran is a small pimple on the world’s ass.
Underestimate them? I don’t think so. I think they OVERESTIMATE their own capabilities. And they ain’t seen the kind of air war that the US dishes out.
I’m looking forward to the contest.
September 17th, 2007 at 11:19 amDid you note the comment that firing the 600 missiles would be just the first reaction? the second step is hte men in power would all bend over to kiss their asses goodbye…
September 17th, 2007 at 11:27 amI hope you’re right Dan and it will be worst pwnge seen on television.
But in the meanwhile I’ll be preparing for the first.
September 17th, 2007 at 11:29 amfirst = worst. Ah crap my typing is way off tonight.
September 17th, 2007 at 11:29 amOh and I forgot, all the cruise missiles and Tomahawks have been upgraded and the stock has been replenished. Ahmeddickwad won’t know from where or from what will be hitting him. Submarines? But where are they? B-52’s out of range and miles away? Conventional munitions launched from US-based silos? Oh I could go on. You get the picture.
600 Missiles eh? Hear me laughing?
September 17th, 2007 at 11:40 am[…] Iran: “We Have 600 Missiles Pointed At Israel” - US Iraq Bases Also Targeted […]
September 17th, 2007 at 11:52 amI hate these iranian fuck pigs. When is ama-douche-ajad going to stop posturing and realize he is tightening the noose around his own neck. Why are we letting this ape come to NYC and address the UN?
Its high time to teach him a lesson. I think most peeps in Iran, save the religies, would be thrilled to see him go.
If anyone ever was deserving of a nuke, its ahmidinejad. I only hope we would drop it on him during ramadan when he is fasting. That would be glorious.
September 17th, 2007 at 12:00 pm“Underestimate them? I don’t think so. I think they OVERESTIMATE their own capabilities. And they ain’t seen the kind of air war that the US dishes out.”
I agree. They saw shock and awe on TV, I have a feeling it’s a little different when you on the recieving end. Their leaders speak loudly and carry a small twig, and in the end that’s going to cost them everything.
September 17th, 2007 at 12:04 pm“Why are we letting this ape come to NYC and address the UN?”
Hopefully so we can throw his ass in Guantanimo.
September 17th, 2007 at 12:06 pmThis is what happens when state department/politicians procrastinate. They should have been taken out by Jimmy Carter.
Alternatively Bush should have given them a “lesson” several years ago.
We tried to make an example of Iraq but the liberals have taken the enemies side, again, and mixed messages are read as weakness and then we get procrastination and crap like this.
They know that attacking Israel is suicide but they are religious fanatics and know that cannot defeat us militarily so they may try to take out Israel just on general principle if push comes to shove.
Dan
September 17th, 2007 at 12:32 pmI think it’s more like 600 flying carpets! This is why we build Tactical Nuclear Weapons…let’s use them, NOW!
September 17th, 2007 at 12:49 pmLet’s welcome Amadjihad with news his shithole is being bombed but to the Stone age (some would argue it already is.
September 17th, 2007 at 1:02 pmWe have nuke subs slurping around the Persian gulf and the Arabian Sea case closed, bottoms up.https://pat-dollard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_beer.gif
September 17th, 2007 at 1:26 pmI may be theorizing here but I would assume we would hit them with a good dose of a nuclear emp to knock out all electronic communications. Those missiles won’t be flying anywhere…Haarp, might have something new to show as well
September 17th, 2007 at 1:34 pmIf they shoot one missile into Israel…
The US and Israel should ‘light up’ both Syria & Iran…so the ‘glow’ could be see around the world…without having a TV.
Peace!
September 17th, 2007 at 1:34 pmDan2
I am sure that their 600 have been accounted for in our planning…I doubt very many even make it off of their launcher.
September 17th, 2007 at 2:03 pm[…] Iran: “We Have 600 Missiles Pointed At Israel” - US Iraq Bases Also Targeted — Pat Dollard […]
September 17th, 2007 at 2:07 pmEmpty threats haha! And even if they could do as they say they would get 10,000 times worse from us.
September 17th, 2007 at 2:59 pmtest
September 17th, 2007 at 3:15 pmI am France le retour
I change my pseudo into Asterix because of a bug in the programm
back on the subject, here is a video on Kouchner’s discourse ; what we say here, he hasn’t got the “tongue of wood” ; he likes the action, and for him that’s meaning “war”, but it is not counting with the whole political elite who are still wanting that discussions go further ; my opinion is that Iran deserves a lesson, we still keep a rotten tooth against the mullahcraty : we had our lot of deads because of them (Drakkar in 1983, the plane crash in Tenere wrongly and purposely attribuated to Khadafy, but in finale from Iran, terrorist attacks in Paris during the nineties… many rancours)
the only thing I hope, is that the iranian population will not have to suffer as the Iraki still do
September 17th, 2007 at 3:30 pmsorry I forgot yhe link
http://tf1.lci.fr/infos/monde/0,,3547640,00-kouchner-faut-preparer-pire-.html
September 17th, 2007 at 3:41 pm“the only thing I hope, is that the iranian population will not have to suffer as the Iraki still do”
http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j97/stars5501/mi3.jpg
September 17th, 2007 at 3:56 pmyeah, Sully, that’s also true !, but you can’t say every is OK as in the best possible world
September 17th, 2007 at 4:09 pmevery thing ment
September 17th, 2007 at 4:09 pmLet’s have a round of Kumbaya for little sheep Frenchy shall we? As for us sheepdogs I prefer “Put silver wings on my sons chest…..” Or the USMC anthem. ROFLOL
Sully: ROFLMAO
September 17th, 2007 at 4:16 pm“but you can’t say every is OK as in the best possible world”
Best possible world?
You gonna quote Leibniz to me now Frenchy?
September 17th, 2007 at 4:45 pmsully:
French is studying “ethics” (cough, cough). Adolph Hitler would be proud of her.
September 17th, 2007 at 5:41 pmYes indeed. And “aesthetics and phylosophy” as I recall. A real Pandoras box all that….. but it does enthrall the lovers of nuance (see: obfuscation) that the ‘left’ have become since McGovern ‘72. That loss to Nixon of all people still stings and they’re still poking around in the caves of ‘thought’ for some way to be sure THAT never happens again. Ol’ Georgie was supposed to have been a ’slam dunk’.
September 17th, 2007 at 10:46 pmhehe, Sully,the knowing-it-all monkey, don’t get mixed with all the boxes though, it is not sufficiant just to recognize the sound of them, you have to really open them, otherwise your looking a bit “candide” :roll: BTW, “the best possible worlds” was not written bei Leibniz (entschuldigen Sie bitte mein Herr) but bei Voltaire
and I don’t mention Dan on that one, his enlightment is dazzling me
September 18th, 2007 at 1:01 amUh no…. it was Leibniz. Voltaire argued AGAINST the notion as a solution to the problem of the existence of evil in the world. A good Frenchy should know that….
“The phrase “the best of all possible worlds” (French: le meilleur des mondes possibles) was coined by the German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz in his 1710 work Essais de Théodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l’homme et l’origine du mal (Theodicy). It is the central argument in Leibniz’s theodicy, or his attempt to solve the problem of evil.”
Try again later.
September 18th, 2007 at 6:46 amhehe, nice, another french originated American ?
actually Voltaire mentionned that sentence in “Candide”, I ‘ll check your “dires” later though
September 18th, 2007 at 7:50 am“hehe, nice, another french originated American ?”
NO!!! Ecrazes l’infame!!! Scots Irish through and through!!!
“actually Voltaire mentionned that sentence in “Candide”,”
Yes he did. Why wouldn’t he? ‘Candide, or The Optimist’ was Voltaires’ satirical argument against the cynicism of Leibniz’ view that the world as it is is the best God *could* create, including evil.
Vastly oversimplifying, without optimism you never get to Burke and “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”
“I ‘ll check your “dires” later though”
Please do…. il faut cultiver notre jardin.
September 18th, 2007 at 9:07 amScots Irish : infernal mixture for an ango-saxon
September 18th, 2007 at 10:18 amAnglo-Saxon??
Now Frenchy…. what part of ‘ecrazes l’infame’ are you finding it difficult to understand? In my own case it is indeed an ‘infernal mixture’ but of a Scandanavian/Spanish variety.
But enough about me… if you’ve nothing to add to our discussion of aesthetics and philosophy, I’ll be back to the world of reductionist syllogisms I’ve come to appreciate as in:
1) I need my head.
September 18th, 2007 at 11:40 am2) I hope it can stay attached to my body.
Therefore: Anyone that threatens to un-attach my head from my body is the ENEMY.
yeah, I didn’t remark that you “pense donc je suis” but rather “am I the winner or not”
in that case the appropriate syllogism is the preferred word that Cambronne left us : M E R… ci
September 18th, 2007 at 12:00 pmYeah, I didn’t think you had a clue.
September 19th, 2007 at 5:52 am