Roggio On Iranians Caught In Iraq
Teaser from Bill Roggio’s report:
Camp Victory, Baghdad Province: The US and Iraqi Army continue to target Iran’s surrogates inside Iraq. Today, US forces captured an officer of Iran’s Qods Force during a raid in the northern Kurdish province of Sulimaniyah.
Coalition forces began targeting the Iranian networks and captured senior members of Iran’s Qods Force in Baghdad in December 2006 and Irbil in January 2007. Iranian surrogates — the Qazali and Sheibani networks, which are now collectively referred to as the Special Groups — stepped up their attacks on Iraqi and Coalition forces in January 2007.
In March of 2007, Coalition forces captured Qais Qazali, his brother Laith Qazali, and several other members of the Qazali network…
Read the full post
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
I wonder how many dems are turning a blind eye to this..
September 20th, 2007 at 10:22 pmThis is part of a larger strategy that seeks to expend more time on removing the IED threat and less money on technological counter-ied ideas. No shit. But I’m not into the capturing of these apostates. I’d like to see them executed as the spies and saboteurs that they are.
Under WWII Geneva Convention Rules Of War and General Order 100,all spies and saboteurs can be executed. Give them a nice water ride first…then a firing squad….
September 20th, 2007 at 10:24 pm[…] Roggio On Iranians Caught In Iraq […]
September 20th, 2007 at 10:27 pmKill em. My bloodlust is up.
September 21st, 2007 at 12:38 am(I wonder how many dems are turning a blind eye to this..)
I dunno, how many are there?
You can be sure that someone will blame their presence on the US policy/war in Iraq.
September 21st, 2007 at 1:36 amHe was on leave visiting relatives during Ramadan.
September 21st, 2007 at 3:15 amDan(The Infidel)
That is right!! All the Dems and their counter parts such as the ACLU that are so concerned with the Geneva convention, should follow all aspects of the rules. I think your idea is very appropriate and should be carried out without a second thought. Even that is too good for those bastards!!
September 21st, 2007 at 4:42 amDan (The Infidel),
I am 110% behind you on this! The libs and other worthless bastards don’t complain when the AQ behead an inoocent, or a member of our militray, and then desecrate their bodies, but no matter what is done with these spies, the Libs will be screaming for due process, which in this case undoubatbley calls for a 6.52 between the eyes, or better yet, behind the ear. And while we are at it, start tossing in the other traitors, Reid, Pelosi, Murtha, etc!
September 21st, 2007 at 6:52 amBradW(The Infidel), Wendy:
I would add this:
The war against islamofacism can only be won by all-out war.
Fuck the UN and the world. We had no stomach for turncoats, and traitors in WWII and we waged a campaign of absolute annihilation of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan. In less than four years we emerged victorious.
The lesson learned from the last victors over Islamofacism, Charles Martel, Vlad The Impaler, and King John III is thus:
All this soft western political lets-hold-hands-and-just-get-along crap doesn’t work in Islamic quital. That’s the lesson of history. What works is exactly what I described earlier.
September 21st, 2007 at 8:58 amDan - settle down. Your statement about calling for “all out war against Islamofascism” is a largely vague and meaningless hyperbole. Unlike WWII, our mortal enemy is not a sovereign government because we have not been attacked by a sovereign government (ie. Imperialist Japan in WWII). We have been attacked by militaristic elements of terror such as Al Qaeda which cannot be directly linked to any individual government. Yes we have evidence that Quds elements are assisting the insurgency in Iraq, but we cannot start a war with Iran soley because of this as it would set a dangerous precedent. Remember, the CIA has been waging proxy wars on foreign soil since the 40s. Not saying it was wrong, but that is just the way it goes. Your simplistic view of the US having the capability to destroy an ideology with pure military force is quixotic at best.
September 21st, 2007 at 9:45 am“Your simplistic view of the US having the capability to destroy an ideology with pure military force is quixotic at best.”
Nazism, Fascism and Emperor Worship weren’t ideologies?
) it’s knowing that you also have to deal with the treasonous pussies at home with zero concept of the threat.
September 21st, 2007 at 2:17 pmWe don’t have to “destroy” it… just beat it into submission.
If anything makes it seem “quixotic” (nice try at the big words BTW
Eric:
Dan - “settle down. ”
Me: You’re too funny….yawnnnnnnn
“Your statement about calling for “all out war against Islamofascism” is a largely vague and meaningless hyperbole. ”
Me: No it ain’t. My essay is based on both Islamic history and Western history. So You’re wrong as usual.
Your knowledge of history is sorely lacking.
“Unlike WWII, our mortal enemy is not a sovereign government because we have not been attacked by a sovereign government (ie. Imperialist Japan in WWII). We have been attacked by militaristic elements of terror such as Al Qaeda which cannot be directly linked to any individual government. Yes we have evidence that Quds elements are assisting the insurgency in Iraq, but we cannot start a war with Iran soley because of this as it would set a dangerous precedent. Remember, the CIA has been waging proxy wars on foreign soil since the 40s. Not saying it was wrong, but that is just the way it goes. Your simplistic view of the US having the capability to destroy an ideology with pure military force is quixotic at best.”
Me: Nice try Eric. If this were a sovereign government such as the USSR or China, it’d be a different story. But it is not.
Islam is a political philosophy born and spread in war. There is no compromise, just victor and vanquished. I made that clear on many occassions. I also made clear that you cannot understand Islamic Jihad with western thinking.
You obviosly haven’t studied the subject at all…or you wouldn’t be as idiotic as you are. But go ahead and keep using your zinn view of history. I love it when you make a complete idiot of yourself.
But just in case you want to change your amateur status, try reading “The Legacy of Jihad” and “Islamic Imperialism”.
In the meantime, go back to your mother’s basement or a hug a tree dipshit.
sully:
You’re fucking good dude….
September 21st, 2007 at 6:03 pmEric:
I should have also suggested you go pick peanuts with that other foreign policy fucktard Jimmy Carter. You sound like him. He didn’t study Islam either.
September 21st, 2007 at 6:24 pm