Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
Sounds like the commentator is voting for Rhue Paul? Part of what he says is true, IMHO. The part about Islamic terrorism turning off other Muslims is happening in Iraq. His use of the term neoconservative is bullshit. You’re either a conservative or you aren’t. There’s no “neo” to it.
Fucking EU fucktard.
From OBL circa 2001:
“As to the relationship between Muslims and infidels, this is summarized by the Most High’s Word: “We renounce you. Enmity and hate shall forever reign between us — till you believe in Allah alone.” So there is an enmity, evidenced by fierce hostility from the heart. And this fierce hostility — that is, battle — ceases only if the infidel submits to the authority of Islam, or if his blood is forbidden from being shed, or if Muslims are at that point in time weak and incapable. But if the hate at any time extinguishes from the heart, this is great apostasy! Allah Almighty’s Word to his Prophet recounts in summation the true relationship: “O Prophet! Wage war against the infidels and hypocrites and be ruthless. Their abode is hell — an evil fate!” Such, then, is the basis and foundation of the relationship between the infidel and the Muslim. Battle, animosity, and hatred — directed from the Muslim to the infidel — is the foundation of our religion. And we consider this a justice and kindness to them.”
“Bin Laden goes so far as to say that the West’s purported hostility toward Islam is wholly predicated on Islam’s innate hostility toward the rest of the world….
However it is noteworthy to add that…”Whatever position one takes as to why Al Qaeda has declared war on America, one thing is clear: We must begin to come to terms with all of Al Qaeda’s rhetoric, not just what is aimed specifically at Western readers. We must particularly come to better appreciate the theological aspects that underpin radical Islam….
The main reason why radicals have managed to increase their following is because most Muslim institutions ..just don’t want to talk about theology. They refuse to broach the difficult and often complex truth that Islam can be interpreted as condoning violence against the unbeliever — and instead repeat the mantra that Islam is peace and hope that all of this debate will go away.”
September 30th, 2007 at 4:53 pmBTW the prefix “neo” means new or recent. So the commentator is using that prefix incorrectly. The so called neo-conservatives were liberals of the 60’s and 70’s who decided that the liberalism of the Dhimis in those years was no lomger represntative of their views…and these liberals then became neo (or new) conservatives. Get your shit together Brits. Fucking idiot commentator.
September 30th, 2007 at 5:19 pmI like seeing this all wrapped up like this.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:19 pmThe part of this tape that should be repeated in the msm is when the taliban english spokesman reiterated that the islamist war was aginst america, jews and christians. this reality is what the liberals refuse to believe. the liberals would have us believe that america is at war with islam yet the taliban and alqaeda has stated clearly that they first declared was against the jews and christians and ameica. Notice he didnt say zionists! as is consistent with the quran , they are to go after the jews and christians as personified by the US and israel.
September 30th, 2007 at 9:02 pmWTF was with that weird misuse of, and rant against, neoconservatives? You covered it, Dan.
October 1st, 2007 at 12:54 pm