Comments on: US Plan For Air Strikes On Iran Backed By British Prime Minister https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/01/us-plan-for-air-strikes-on-iran-backed-by-brown/ Eventually, I learned the joys of killing. But I’m skipping ahead of myself. I landed in Iraq in November 2004 armed with a video camera instead of a weapon... Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:41:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1 By: CJWarner https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/01/us-plan-for-air-strikes-on-iran-backed-by-brown/#comment-51646 CJWarner Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:58:08 +0000 https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/01/us-plan-for-air-strikes-on-iran-backed-by-brown/#comment-51646 I just don't think Seymour Hersh has any definitive information. It would be easy to make educated guesses and pass them off as fact by writing authoritative sounding articles on an odd combination of impossible to confirm pieces of information. I am not a writer for the New Yorker. But I have it on good authority that the president of the criminal Persian crusaders is NOT backing the U.S. Plan for Airstrikes on Iran. I just don’t think Seymour Hersh has any definitive information. It would be easy to make educated guesses and pass them off as fact by writing authoritative sounding articles on an odd combination of impossible to confirm pieces of information.

I am not a writer for the New Yorker. But I have it on good authority that the president of the criminal Persian crusaders is NOT backing the U.S. Plan for Airstrikes on Iran.

]]> By: Dan(The Infidel) https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/01/us-plan-for-air-strikes-on-iran-backed-by-brown/#comment-51670 Dan(The Infidel) Tue, 02 Oct 2007 01:33:15 +0000 https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/01/us-plan-for-air-strikes-on-iran-backed-by-brown/#comment-51670 I'm not a Seymour Hirsh fan. He's still riding on his My Lai Massacre Pulitzer. There are way too many libtards that think they got the scoop on the military; and I doubt every word of their reporting. It is beyond doubt that a war with Iran has already been wargamed and a target list generated. Does that include tactical nukes? Well that's a stupid question. It doesn't take a Yale grad to figure this scenario out. I’m not a Seymour Hirsh fan. He’s still riding on his My Lai Massacre Pulitzer. There are way too many libtards that think they got the scoop on the military; and I doubt every word of their reporting.

It is beyond doubt that a war with Iran has already been wargamed and a target list generated. Does that include tactical nukes? Well that’s a stupid question.

It doesn’t take a Yale grad to figure this scenario out.

]]> By: Clyde Conneer https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/01/us-plan-for-air-strikes-on-iran-backed-by-brown/#comment-51676 Clyde Conneer Tue, 02 Oct 2007 01:41:56 +0000 https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/01/us-plan-for-air-strikes-on-iran-backed-by-brown/#comment-51676 Hersh maintains that the Bush administration’s emphasis on “surgical” strikes reflects a failure to persuade the US public that Iran poses an imminent nuclear threat. Shut TF up Seymour, what you don't know would fill a TM. I'm US public. I'm convinced. DESTROY QODS FORCE TONIGHT! Hersh maintains that the Bush administration’s emphasis on “surgical” strikes reflects a failure to persuade the US public that Iran poses an imminent nuclear threat.

Shut TF up Seymour, what you don’t know would fill a TM.

I’m US public. I’m convinced.

DESTROY QODS FORCE TONIGHT!

]]> By: Brian H https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/01/us-plan-for-air-strikes-on-iran-backed-by-brown/#comment-51711 Brian H Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:39:40 +0000 https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/01/us-plan-for-air-strikes-on-iran-backed-by-brown/#comment-51711 The article borders on the incoherent, and misrepresents a significant number of matters. But since Hirsch has a sterling record of being wrong, this srticle is actually a good omen. The article borders on the incoherent, and misrepresents a significant number of matters. But since Hirsch has a sterling record of being wrong, this srticle is actually a good omen.

]]>