<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liberal Media Blatant About Burying Current Low Casualty Numbers</title>
	<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/07/liberal-media-blatant-about-burying-current-low-casualty-numbers/</link>
	<description>Eventually, I learned the joys of killing. But I’m skipping ahead of myself. I landed in Iraq in November 2004 armed with a video camera instead of a weapon...</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Humble Janoslav</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/07/liberal-media-blatant-about-burying-current-low-casualty-numbers/#comment-53913</link>
		<author>Humble Janoslav</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/07/liberal-media-blatant-about-burying-current-low-casualty-numbers/#comment-53913</guid>
					<description>At least Doubting Thomas had the good sense to recognize his risen Lord and Savior. These people wouldn't recognize progress if it bit them in the face. 

Change by its definition is newsworthy. A dramatic fall in casualty during a "high" casualty war is in itself newsworthy. Ensconce that in the fact that September was to be an exceptionally high-casualty month and you have the makings of a rather dramatic story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least Doubting Thomas had the good sense to recognize his risen Lord and Savior. These people wouldn&#8217;t recognize progress if it bit them in the face. </p>
<p>Change by its definition is newsworthy. A dramatic fall in casualty during a &#8220;high&#8221; casualty war is in itself newsworthy. Ensconce that in the fact that September was to be an exceptionally high-casualty month and you have the makings of a rather dramatic story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan (The Infidel)</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/07/liberal-media-blatant-about-burying-current-low-casualty-numbers/#comment-53917</link>
		<author>Dan (The Infidel)</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/07/liberal-media-blatant-about-burying-current-low-casualty-numbers/#comment-53917</guid>
					<description>Isn't "Reliable Sources" an oxymoron? Why in the fuck would anyone but a lib watch CNN anyways? There is nothing on that channel worth watching anymore. The real news is at "Dollard Nation" and "Yon Nation" and "Sanchez Nation"
and "Reggio Nation", Hot Air, Atlas Shrugs and Jihadwatch abd a few other good ones. So with all these excellent sources of news why in the fuck should I care what CNN or any other LLMSM outlet is saying anymore; since in my view they have lost all their credibility?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t &#8220;Reliable Sources&#8221; an oxymoron? Why in the fuck would anyone but a lib watch CNN anyways? There is nothing on that channel worth watching anymore. The real news is at &#8220;Dollard Nation&#8221; and &#8220;Yon Nation&#8221; and &#8220;Sanchez Nation&#8221;<br />
and &#8220;Reggio Nation&#8221;, Hot Air, Atlas Shrugs and Jihadwatch abd a few other good ones. So with all these excellent sources of news why in the fuck should I care what CNN or any other LLMSM outlet is saying anymore; since in my view they have lost all their credibility?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dbo</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/07/liberal-media-blatant-about-burying-current-low-casualty-numbers/#comment-53927</link>
		<author>Dbo</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 01:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/07/liberal-media-blatant-about-burying-current-low-casualty-numbers/#comment-53927</guid>
					<description>fundamentally change is either good or bad.

It cant be anything else. Its either one or the other. There is no other alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fundamentally change is either good or bad.</p>
<p>It cant be anything else. Its either one or the other. There is no other alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/07/liberal-media-blatant-about-burying-current-low-casualty-numbers/#comment-53929</link>
		<author>Jim</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 01:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/07/liberal-media-blatant-about-burying-current-low-casualty-numbers/#comment-53929</guid>
					<description>Who said it had to be reported as a "trend". I smell Bullsh*t. Simply stated "Its been the lowest since..." etc., 

"We’ve had five years of the Pentagon telling us there is progress, there is progress. Forgive me for being skeptical,"

This has nothing to do with you retard, just report the facts as they are. Do they feel they have to put some sort of perspective on it to give it legitimacy. This is hack reporting for a hack rag/news agency.

These jackass reporters are by and large sh*t merchants. People who don't give a hoot who these reporters are, are being deceived by their interpretation of the news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said it had to be reported as a &#8220;trend&#8221;. I smell Bullsh*t. Simply stated &#8220;Its been the lowest since&#8230;&#8221; etc., </p>
<p>&#8220;We’ve had five years of the Pentagon telling us there is progress, there is progress. Forgive me for being skeptical,&#8221;</p>
<p>This has nothing to do with you retard, just report the facts as they are. Do they feel they have to put some sort of perspective on it to give it legitimacy. This is hack reporting for a hack rag/news agency.</p>
<p>These jackass reporters are by and large sh*t merchants. People who don&#8217;t give a hoot who these reporters are, are being deceived by their interpretation of the news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike from the Republic of Texas</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/07/liberal-media-blatant-about-burying-current-low-casualty-numbers/#comment-53945</link>
		<author>Mike from the Republic of Texas</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 02:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/07/liberal-media-blatant-about-burying-current-low-casualty-numbers/#comment-53945</guid>
					<description>Well suprise surprise!! :roll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well suprise surprise!! <img src='/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dannyboy</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/07/liberal-media-blatant-about-burying-current-low-casualty-numbers/#comment-53952</link>
		<author>Dannyboy</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 02:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/07/liberal-media-blatant-about-burying-current-low-casualty-numbers/#comment-53952</guid>
					<description>Just f'ing report it. We don't need you a**holes to determine whether or not it's a trend. Report it. That's your job. Put the numbers out there and any rational person can determine what to think. You twits are fine with reporting casualties being up, or all the misinformation about Petraeus...how about numbers that might be "misconstrued" as encouraging? Oh, that's right...you're probably among the 20% who want us to lose the war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just f&#8217;ing report it. We don&#8217;t need you a**holes to determine whether or not it&#8217;s a trend. Report it. That&#8217;s your job. Put the numbers out there and any rational person can determine what to think. You twits are fine with reporting casualties being up, or all the misinformation about Petraeus&#8230;how about numbers that might be &#8220;misconstrued&#8221; as encouraging? Oh, that&#8217;s right&#8230;you&#8217;re probably among the 20% who want us to lose the war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
