<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audio: Nixon On Fred Thompson: &#8216;Dumb&#8217; But &#8216;Friendly&#8217;</title>
	<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/</link>
	<description>Eventually, I learned the joys of killing. But I’m skipping ahead of myself. I landed in Iraq in November 2004 armed with a video camera instead of a weapon...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Dan (The Infidel)</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54491</link>
		<author>Dan (The Infidel)</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54491</guid>
					<description>I recall listening to FT on the TV during that era. I was impressed with him and remarked to my military colleagues that I thought that FT had a bright political future ahead of him. So what's the beef? I don't have any. I think at the last minute even FT figured that Nixon was a POS, even though FT may have started out as an ally of RMN.

My impression of FT at the time was that he came across as fair-minded. I still have that impression of him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall listening to FT on the TV during that era. I was impressed with him and remarked to my military colleagues that I thought that FT had a bright political future ahead of him. So what&#8217;s the beef? I don&#8217;t have any. I think at the last minute even FT figured that Nixon was a POS, even though FT may have started out as an ally of RMN.</p>
<p>My impression of FT at the time was that he came across as fair-minded. I still have that impression of him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winghunter</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54498</link>
		<author>Winghunter</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54498</guid>
					<description>I'm very interested to understand why you think that your obvious heavy bias in your interpretation of those very small soundbites is any better than the worst spin we've ever seen or heard from anywhere.

Wherein, you suggest that Nixon's assessment of someone he didn't even know, when surrounded by 'yes' men, is somehow valid when Nixon himself was the one to provide the evidence of his own demise. ( Now, THAT'S stupid!! )

To suggest Fred was "secretly" working for Nixon is actually very funny...Fred asked the question which made Nixon's resignation possible!

Come on now Bash! You apparently have another candidate in mind and can't find anything better to hold over the next Presidents head...don't feel alone, no one else can find anything either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very interested to understand why you think that your obvious heavy bias in your interpretation of those very small soundbites is any better than the worst spin we&#8217;ve ever seen or heard from anywhere.</p>
<p>Wherein, you suggest that Nixon&#8217;s assessment of someone he didn&#8217;t even know, when surrounded by &#8216;yes&#8217; men, is somehow valid when Nixon himself was the one to provide the evidence of his own demise. ( Now, THAT&#8217;S stupid!! )</p>
<p>To suggest Fred was &#8220;secretly&#8221; working for Nixon is actually very funny&#8230;Fred asked the question which made Nixon&#8217;s resignation possible!</p>
<p>Come on now Bash! You apparently have another candidate in mind and can&#8217;t find anything better to hold over the next Presidents head&#8230;don&#8217;t feel alone, no one else can find anything either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamplighter</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54504</link>
		<author>Lamplighter</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54504</guid>
					<description>Well, let's keep some perspective here. "Dumb" means he's not going to carry Nixon's water. "Friendly" means he's not hostile.  What Nixon thought of FT 30 years ago is of no consequence. I sometimes wonder how Nixon was elected--he has negatives just like Billary. In fact, Billary is positively Nixonian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, let&#8217;s keep some perspective here. &#8220;Dumb&#8221; means he&#8217;s not going to carry Nixon&#8217;s water. &#8220;Friendly&#8221; means he&#8217;s not hostile.  What Nixon thought of FT 30 years ago is of no consequence. I sometimes wonder how Nixon was elected&#8211;he has negatives just like Billary. In fact, Billary is positively Nixonian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamplighter</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54508</link>
		<author>Lamplighter</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54508</guid>
					<description>In reviewing the 1968 election, it occurs to me that Billary is taking a page out of the Nixon playbook. By all accounts, Nixon should not have won, especially with Wallace in the race.  Humphrey was the Democrat, the "happy warrior."  What Nixon did, and Hillary is doing, is casting the Iraq War as a disaster (like Vietnam) and the party whose President presides over it a disaster (like the 1968 Dems), and showing how divided the GOP is over it (like the Dems in 1968).  She's making ambiguous statements about the war, just like Nixon did. She's trying to make 2008 a replay of 1968, when the party presiding over an unpopular war was tossed out, for a rather unappealing person from the other party (Nixon).   Think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reviewing the 1968 election, it occurs to me that Billary is taking a page out of the Nixon playbook. By all accounts, Nixon should not have won, especially with Wallace in the race.  Humphrey was the Democrat, the &#8220;happy warrior.&#8221;  What Nixon did, and Hillary is doing, is casting the Iraq War as a disaster (like Vietnam) and the party whose President presides over it a disaster (like the 1968 Dems), and showing how divided the GOP is over it (like the Dems in 1968).  She&#8217;s making ambiguous statements about the war, just like Nixon did. She&#8217;s trying to make 2008 a replay of 1968, when the party presiding over an unpopular war was tossed out, for a rather unappealing person from the other party (Nixon).   Think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Marcoe</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54513</link>
		<author>David Marcoe</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54513</guid>
					<description>If memory serves, those same White House tapes had Nixon going on extended rants about the Jews. Should we all start putting on tin foil hats and worrying about the media conglomerates and law firms?

We have a handful of words spoken and hearsay to contradict the very plain historical fact that he didn't do those things they wanted. Nor has his record in the intervening years shown any similar pattern of behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If memory serves, those same White House tapes had Nixon going on extended rants about the Jews. Should we all start putting on tin foil hats and worrying about the media conglomerates and law firms?</p>
<p>We have a handful of words spoken and hearsay to contradict the very plain historical fact that he didn&#8217;t do those things they wanted. Nor has his record in the intervening years shown any similar pattern of behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sully</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54514</link>
		<author>sully</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54514</guid>
					<description>Yeah. Who gives a rats ass what Nixon thought about anything or anybody.

Oh wait.... I do have a newfound appreciation for the policy of assassinating dickhead dictators and installing other dictators more friendly to our cause.  :wink:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. Who gives a rats ass what Nixon thought about anything or anybody.</p>
<p>Oh wait&#8230;. I do have a newfound appreciation for the policy of assassinating dickhead dictators and installing other dictators more friendly to our cause.  <img src='/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=':wink:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bashman</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54520</link>
		<author>Bashman</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54520</guid>
					<description>Winghunter, you said:

"...why you think that your obvious heavy bias in your interpretation of those very small soundbites..."

My OBVIOUS bias in my INTERPRETATION...?

Chill out, dude, I posted a story, didn't add anything, didn't take anything away. Didn't interpret anything, and have no biases. Where the hell did you gather that information from?

I personally haven't decided who I will vote for yet, I'll wait until I've made sure I understand where each candidate is coming from.

What's obvious here, is you are a bit touchy. Relax...I don't dislike Fred, as a matter of fact, he doesn't have a line through his name on my list of candidates, which means he still has a great shot at getting my vote.

Chill...have a cigar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Winghunter, you said:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;why you think that your obvious heavy bias in your interpretation of those very small soundbites&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>My OBVIOUS bias in my INTERPRETATION&#8230;?</p>
<p>Chill out, dude, I posted a story, didn&#8217;t add anything, didn&#8217;t take anything away. Didn&#8217;t interpret anything, and have no biases. Where the hell did you gather that information from?</p>
<p>I personally haven&#8217;t decided who I will vote for yet, I&#8217;ll wait until I&#8217;ve made sure I understand where each candidate is coming from.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s obvious here, is you are a bit touchy. Relax&#8230;I don&#8217;t dislike Fred, as a matter of fact, he doesn&#8217;t have a line through his name on my list of candidates, which means he still has a great shot at getting my vote.</p>
<p>Chill&#8230;have a cigar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franchie</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54530</link>
		<author>franchie</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54530</guid>
					<description>Nixon did acknowledge China though

and we don't see him as a nuts here ; he stopped Vietnam war because of the numerous riots across the country ; he did not want a civil war but gather the different opinions people ;

he had respect for De Gaulle who did the same for France in 1945 (and de Gaulle had the same respect for him) to avoid a civil war too, he buried the warmonger hachet

it's rare and though pertinent for de Gaulle to praise an american president :lol:

hey, Dan, stay out !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nixon did acknowledge China though</p>
<p>and we don&#8217;t see him as a nuts here ; he stopped Vietnam war because of the numerous riots across the country ; he did not want a civil war but gather the different opinions people ;</p>
<p>he had respect for De Gaulle who did the same for France in 1945 (and de Gaulle had the same respect for him) to avoid a civil war too, he buried the warmonger hachet</p>
<p>it&#8217;s rare and though pertinent for de Gaulle to praise an american president <img src='/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>hey, Dan, stay out !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sully</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54538</link>
		<author>sully</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54538</guid>
					<description>"...he stopped Vietnam war because of the numerous riots across the country..."

You really do not know much about history do you?

There are these things called 'books' which, if you haven't actually lived through that period of history, you might find to be helpful. Perhaps more than one on a subject. And don't just read what you already believe. K?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;he stopped Vietnam war because of the numerous riots across the country&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>You really do not know much about history do you?</p>
<p>There are these things called &#8216;books&#8217; which, if you haven&#8217;t actually lived through that period of history, you might find to be helpful. Perhaps more than one on a subject. And don&#8217;t just read what you already believe. K?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franchie</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54540</link>
		<author>franchie</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54540</guid>
					<description>Mr professor, I can't know perfectly everything (only ones that matters for me) but I wait your edifiant course if you are kind enough to give me one ; depends on the tone though, I can be deaf sometimes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr professor, I can&#8217;t know perfectly everything (only ones that matters for me) but I wait your edifiant course if you are kind enough to give me one ; depends on the tone though, I can be deaf sometimes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sully</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54543</link>
		<author>sully</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54543</guid>
					<description>like I said... read a book or two or three before you try spinning revisionist history all over the web. Or at least spend some more time over at the kos. They're much better at it than you.

There... school's out... run along and do your homework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like I said&#8230; read a book or two or three before you try spinning revisionist history all over the web. Or at least spend some more time over at the kos. They&#8217;re much better at it than you.</p>
<p>There&#8230; school&#8217;s out&#8230; run along and do your homework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franchie</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54549</link>
		<author>franchie</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54549</guid>
					<description>yeah, you just missed the point, I ain't  looking for a book on Mr Nixon, unless it falls onto my hands, I'll may-be try to read it because of your insistance, but of course it will not be the correct one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, you just missed the point, I ain&#8217;t  looking for a book on Mr Nixon, unless it falls onto my hands, I&#8217;ll may-be try to read it because of your insistance, but of course it will not be the correct one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sully</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54558</link>
		<author>sully</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54558</guid>
					<description>well then do you know what you say about Nixon is 'true' if you've not studied it at all and/or were alive at that time?
Uh...that would be 'true' as in facts based upon evidence as opposed to what you think that feels right today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well then do you know what you say about Nixon is &#8216;true&#8217; if you&#8217;ve not studied it at all and/or were alive at that time?<br />
Uh&#8230;that would be &#8216;true&#8217; as in facts based upon evidence as opposed to what you think that feels right today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franchie</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54561</link>
		<author>franchie</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54561</guid>
					<description>"that would be ‘true’ as in facts based upon evidence as opposed to what you think that feels right today."

yeah, and you know what I feel right today of course, I wonder  if I feel something anyway, I am just curious</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;that would be ‘true’ as in facts based upon evidence as opposed to what you think that feels right today.&#8221;</p>
<p>yeah, and you know what I feel right today of course, I wonder  if I feel something anyway, I am just curious</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goodbye Natalie</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54565</link>
		<author>Goodbye Natalie</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54565</guid>
					<description>I have no pony in the race because I'll be pulling the Republican lever.  But I have to admit, the more I learn of Fred Thompson, the less impressed I am.

He apparently has little or no record of great accomplishment as a Senator, voted against the impeachment of Billy Bob Clinton, and appears to like to spend great sums of our money with less than stellar results.  I really hope somebody else is the candidate of choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no pony in the race because I&#8217;ll be pulling the Republican lever.  But I have to admit, the more I learn of Fred Thompson, the less impressed I am.</p>
<p>He apparently has little or no record of great accomplishment as a Senator, voted against the impeachment of Billy Bob Clinton, and appears to like to spend great sums of our money with less than stellar results.  I really hope somebody else is the candidate of choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan (The Infidel)</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54580</link>
		<author>Dan (The Infidel)</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54580</guid>
					<description>Frenchie:

Once again, you totally missed the point of the orginal discussion. Why don;t you try sticking to the points of the discussion instead of walking off on some idiotic tanhent, that has nothing to do with the posting. Are you ADD or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frenchie:</p>
<p>Once again, you totally missed the point of the orginal discussion. Why don;t you try sticking to the points of the discussion instead of walking off on some idiotic tanhent, that has nothing to do with the posting. Are you ADD or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan (The Infidel)</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54581</link>
		<author>Dan (The Infidel)</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54581</guid>
					<description>Frenchie:

The posting is on Nixon's view on Thompson. It is not on Nixon in general. Or his policies. I know you don't read English very well, but maybe you'd be better off going over to the Daily Kos. They don't know anything about history either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frenchie:</p>
<p>The posting is on Nixon&#8217;s view on Thompson. It is not on Nixon in general. Or his policies. I know you don&#8217;t read English very well, but maybe you&#8217;d be better off going over to the Daily Kos. They don&#8217;t know anything about history either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranger</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54625</link>
		<author>Ranger</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 04:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54625</guid>
					<description>Still don't know about Thompson...might be an alien plant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still don&#8217;t know about Thompson&#8230;might be an alien plant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franchie</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54671</link>
		<author>franchie</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54671</guid>
					<description>Dan,

WTF es ist mir Scheiz egal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>WTF es ist mir Scheiz egal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan (The Infidel)</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54700</link>
		<author>Dan (The Infidel)</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/10/09/audionixon-on-fred-thompson-dumb-but-friendly/#comment-54700</guid>
					<description>Frenchie:

Sailed right over your head didn't it my little french poodle. ROFLOL :mrgreen:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frenchie:</p>
<p>Sailed right over your head didn&#8217;t it my little french poodle. ROFLOL <img src='/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
