Morgan Stanley Sells Off Entire New York Times Stake

October 17th, 2007 Posted By Pat Dollard.

NYT Tower Hudson

Oct. 17 — Morgan Stanley, the second-biggest shareholder in New York Times Co., sold its entire 7.3 percent stake today, according to a person briefed on the transaction, sending the stock to its lowest in more than 10 years.

The person declined to be identified because Morgan Stanley hasn’t made the sale public yet. Traders with knowledge of the transaction said Merrill Lynch & Co. brokered a $183 million block trade of 10 million New York Times shares this morning.

Hassan Elmasry, managing director of Morgan Stanley Investment Management, unsuccessfully challenged the Sulzberger family’s control of New York Times Co. through super-voting stock that gives them a board majority. Shareholders owning 42 percent of the company, parent of the namesake newspaper and Boston Globe, withheld support for directors at the publisher’s April annual meeting.

New York Times shares slid 54 cents, or 2.9 percent, to $18.37 at 2:51 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading and fell as low as $18.24, a level not seen since January 1997.

Bloomberg


    • Young Americans Documentary
    • Learn More About Pat
    • blogroll

      • A Soldier's Perspective
      • American Soldier
      • Ann Coulter
      • Attack Machine
      • Bill Ardolino
      • Bill Roggio
      • Black Five
      • Blonde Sagacity
      • Breitbart
      • Chicagoray
      • Confederate Yankee
      • Day by Day Cartoon
      • Euphoric Reality
      • Flopping Aces
      • Free Republic
      • Frontier Web Design
      • Hot Air
      • Hugh Hewitt
      • Ian Schwartz
      • Instapundit
      • Little Green Footballs
      • Matt Sanchez
      • Michael Fumento
      • Michael Yon
      • Michelle Malkin
      • Military.com
      • Missiles And Stilletos
      • Move America Forward
      • Mudville Gazette
      • Pass The Ammo
      • Roger L. Simon
      • Sportsman's Outfit
      • Stop The ACLU
      • TCOverride
      • The Belmont Club
      • The Big God Blog
      • The Crimson Blog
      • The Daily Gut
      • The Drudge Report
      • The PoliTicking Timebomb
      • The Pundit Review
      • Veteran's Affairs Documentary

10 Responses

  1. sully

    “The person declined to be identified …”

    Probably Al-Jezeera or some other like minded ‘enterprise’.

  2. Cridhe Saorsa

    That rag isn’t worth a nickel anyway.

  3. PhilNBlanx

    Abandon ship, abandon ship!!!

  4. mshatto

    Ah! The free market at work. Put out trash and soon or later you get taken out with it.

  5. Kurt(The Infidel)

    Power to the people! thats what makes our market and this whole country so great. screw the New York Slimes

  6. StreetDoctor

    No surprise here. They have been anything but a legitimate news outlet for some time. Anyone catch O’reilly last night? The NY Times had no problem reporting BS charges of violating ROE in Afghanistan brought up against two Green Berets but never published a follow up once they were acquitted of any wrongdoing (for the second time, i may add). Likewise, their oh so surgical omission of much of what Gen. Sanchez had to say about them and their friends. What a waste of perfectly good trees.

  7. eddie p.

    You have to understand that Morgan Stanley had huge offices in the Twin Towers and that the TREASONUS screed emitting from the New York Times was just too much for them to suffer any longer so they must have had a vote to approve the sell off. Morgan Stanley actually lost employees on 9/11 so one can see there is a moral and patriotic component here as well. Folks like Krugman and Rich wont ever have to worry about a terrorist attack because they are directly helping their cause. The NYT is not even fit to be called trash. Its ready made garbage pre packaged to be consumed by a nation of Ward Churchillian robots forever convinced that America is evil and that Marx had it right!!!!

  8. Dave

    My dogs has good taste, they prefer urinating on the NYTs, to the Albuquerque Journal.

  9. Dave

    oops, should have said have good taste.

  10. Ranger

    The only thing that’s a shame is that MS didn’t successfully take it over from the Sulzbergers.

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen::neutral::twisted::arrow::shock::smile::???::cool::evil::grin::idea::oops::razz::roll::wink::cry::eek::lol::mad::sad::!::?::beer: