Ahmadinejad: “We Will Not Make The Slightest Concession”

November 21st, 2007 Posted By Pat Dollard.

putin-ahmadinejad-tehran3.jpg

TEHRAN, Nov 21 (AFP) Nov 21, 2007

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Wednesday ruled out giving “the slightest concession” in Iran’s atomic standoff with the West, amid doubts over whether new talks with the European Union would go ahead.

Ahmadinejad’s remarks were the latest sign his government has no intention of suspending uranium enrichment, the key sticking point between Iran and world powers in the nuclear crisis.

“They (the enemies) must know that Iran will not give the slightest concession… to any power,” Ahmadinejad said in a speech broadcast live by state television.

“If they manage to take even a small concession from us, they will later seek other concessions by making threats,” he said during a trip to the northern province of Ardebil.

Iranian officials said his close ally and new top nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili is due to meet EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana next week in their latest attempt to break the deadlock.

Ahmadinejad last month replaced former nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani with Jalili, a move that was interpreted as aiming to increase Ahmadinejad’s control in the nuclear talks.

“The meeting will take place in the next week but the venue and the exact date has not been determined,” said an official source at Iran’s Supreme National Security Council which is headed by Jalili.

But Solana doubted whether the meeting could take place in the next two weeks.

“I have been in contact with them (the Iranians). I don’t see this week because they have not offered any date. I will be at their disposal this week but it has not been possible,” he told reporters in Brussels.

“Next week will be very difficult,” he said. Solana is due to take part in a key Middle East peace conference in the United States on Tuesday.

A meeting scheduled for Wednesday between Jalili’s deputy Javad Vaeedi and a top Solana aide Robert Cooper, to prepare the crucial encounter between their bosses, was also postponed to a later date, officials said.

Solana must report to the UN Security Council by the end of November on Tehran’s willingness to comply with the council’s demand to freeze uranium enrichment, a potential bomb-making process.

He has tried to persuade Tehran to resume talks on suspending uranium enrichment in exchange for a package of political and economic incentives but Tehran has refused to offer concessions.

Iran has already had two sets of UN sanctions imposed on it over the issue.

“We believe that nuclear energy is our nation’s right and today this energy is at our disposal,” Ahmadinejad said. “No one can take it from us.”

Washington accuses Tehran of using its programme as cover for a drive to develop an atomic bomb. Iran strongly denies that charge, saying it wants only to generate electricity.

Tehran forged an August agreement with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, to examine outstanding issues in its atomic activities, including uranium-enriching centrifuges.

The IAEA report of November 15 said Iran had taken important steps in revealing the extent of its nuclear drive but was still defying UN demands that it suspend uranium enrichment.

The IAEA said it would focus on the contamination issue in the next few weeks as well as studies and activities that the West fears could have military applications.

Iran’s refusal to halt enrichment has angered Western powers led by the United States, which has been pushing for a third UN Security Council resolution imposing sanctions on Tehran.

The White House has vowed to seek further UN sanctions on Tehran, while never ruling out military action if Iran persists with its nuclear programme.

“We have many times said that the nuclear issue has ended from our point of view,” a defiant Ahmadinejad said.


    • Young Americans Documentary
    • Learn More About Pat
    • blogroll

      • A Soldier's Perspective
      • American Soldier
      • Ann Coulter
      • Attack Machine
      • Bill Ardolino
      • Bill Roggio
      • Black Five
      • Blonde Sagacity
      • Breitbart
      • Chicagoray
      • Confederate Yankee
      • Day by Day Cartoon
      • Euphoric Reality
      • Flopping Aces
      • Free Republic
      • Frontier Web Design
      • Hot Air
      • Hugh Hewitt
      • Ian Schwartz
      • Instapundit
      • Little Green Footballs
      • Matt Sanchez
      • Michael Fumento
      • Michael Yon
      • Michelle Malkin
      • Military.com
      • Missiles And Stilletos
      • Move America Forward
      • Mudville Gazette
      • Pass The Ammo
      • Roger L. Simon
      • Sportsman's Outfit
      • Stop The ACLU
      • TCOverride
      • The Belmont Club
      • The Big God Blog
      • The Crimson Blog
      • The Daily Gut
      • The Drudge Report
      • The PoliTicking Timebomb
      • The Pundit Review

8 Responses

  1. ShortFuse

    I can see right now that everyone will do a Saddam Hussein on Iran and give them enough time to build all the nuclear shit they need to hurt someone before anything happens to those murdering bastards. And then the weapons of mass destruction will disappear again until Iran needs them to blow our asses out of the water.
    Let’s just wait and see what happens with these killers–right–good plan for protecting the country.
    Blow their fucking heads off.

  2. Kurt(the infidel)

    Iran is already too close to having a bomb as far as im concerned. they already have plenty of material for dirty bombs which is a scary enough scenario.

    I agree with you ShortFuse, sure as hell seems like we are just going to sit on our hands until its too late

  3. Steve in NC

    When are we going to stop playing ring a round a rosie with this agent of satan?

  4. The I.C.E. Man

    “No one can take it from us.”

    Will you stake your life on it… :twisted:

  5. Dave M

    November 08 - after the elections are out of the way
    unless the Israelis act sooner.

  6. CPLViper

    I said it once and I will say it again.

    Tick, tick, tick, tick … time is running out.

    If this was occurring during the 80’s, Reagan would have flatten Tehran by now.

  7. skip1

    IMHO Iran has an atom bomb. However, big difference from having an atom bomb to having an atomic weapon. There is also big difference between atomic weapons to atomic weapons arsenal.

    Progression: Atomic bomb—Atomic Weapon—Atomic Arsenal.

    You need an atomic arsenal to make yourself immune from bombing, invasion. You need a creditable nuclear counterstrike capacity. That is what Iran is striving for. Let’s say Iran has advance to lets say 7 atomic bombs & maybe a few atomic weapons. Those in themselves could cause great destruction but if used an American nuclear counter attack would utterly return Iran back to the Stone Age. Mullahs want to create a Caliphate. They can’t do that if their country is vaporized. So for now they are extremely venerable, our window of opportunity. However, let’s say Iran has a nuclear arsenal of 200-500, and then they could counter attack us which would be effect deterrence. This is what President Bus was referring when he made his WWIII comment about Iran & Nukes. Yes stopping the mullahs now before it’s too late. The only way now is to invade & topple the mullahs from power. Bombing alone WILL NOT DO IT. Will Bush do it? Well time will tell which he is running out of.
    .

  8. JonnyMordant

    All I see in that Photo is Ahmadinejad trying to hold hands with Putin and Putin’s Fists balled up for business! Putin looks like what’s running through his mind is “Mama said Knock you out”!

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen::neutral::twisted::arrow::shock::smile::???::cool::evil::grin::idea::oops::razz::roll::wink::cry::eek::lol::mad::sad::!::?::beer: