BBC Knew About Terrorist Pukes And Didn’t Say Shit
Look at ‘em, just look at ‘em…fukn pukes.
You have to wonder what the fuck the BBC was thinking on this one.
In the summer of 2005 the BBC paid for a paintballing excursion in order to film a video entitled “Don’t Panic, I’m Islamic” in an attempt to paint Muslims with a good shade. Guess what? Three of those paintballing nice guys we shouldn’t really be concerned about ended up being involved in the failed July 21st bombings.
In fact, one of the guys, Mohammed Hamid, described by a BBC producer as a “cockney comic” was charged with overseeing a two-year radicalization program to prepare London-based Muslim youths for jihad.
When the BBC found out about the connections…they didn’t say a fucking word.
Nasreen Suleaman, a researcher on the programme, told the court that Mr Hamid, 50, contacted her after the July 2005 attack and told her of his association with the bombers. But she said that she felt no obligation to contact the police with this information. Ms Suleaman said that she informed senior BBC managers but was not told to contact the police.
Nods to Little Green Footballs and you can watch the whole 20 minute “Don’t Panic, I’m Islamic” vid if you want.
This from Adam Sherwin of TimesOnline:
The BBC funded a paintballing trip for men later accused of Islamic terrorism and failed to pass on information about the 21/7 bombers to police, a court was told yesterday.
Mohammed Hamid, who is charged with overseeing a two-year radicalisation programme to prepare London-based Muslim youths for jihad, was described as a “cockney comic” by a BBC producer.
The BBC paid for Mr Hamid and fellow defendants Muhammad al-Figari and Mousa Brown to go on a paintballing trip at the Delta Force centre in Tonbridge, Kent, in February 2005. The men, accused of terrorism training, were filmed for a BBC programme called Don’t Panic, I’m Islamic, screened in June 2005.
The BBC paid Mr Hamid, an Islamic preacher who denies recruiting and grooming the men behind the failed July 2005 attack, a £300 fee to take part in the programme, Woolwich Crown Court was told.
It was alleged that Mr Hamid told a BBC reporter that he would use the corporation’s money to pay a fine imposed by magistrates for a public order offence.
Nasreen Suleaman, a researcher on the programme, told the court that Mr Hamid, 50, contacted her after the July 2005 attack and told her of his association with the bombers. But she said that she felt no obligation to contact the police with this information. Ms Suleaman said that she informed senior BBC managers but was not told to contact the police.
The court was told previously that Mr Hamid taunted police on his return from an alleged terror training camp in the New Forest where exercises included somersaults, pole-vaulting and paintballing.
Duncan Penny, for the prosecution, asked Ms Suleaman if she had told Mr Hamid to go to the police or contacted the police herself. Mr Penny asked: “Here was a man who told you that he knew those individuals who, as I understand it, were still at large for what on the face of it was the attempted bombings of the transport network a fortnight after it happened, and he was telling you he had some knowledge of them? There was a worldwide manhunt going on, wasn’t there?”
She replied: “I got the sense that he was already talking to the police. I referred it to my immediate boss at the BBC. I wasn’t told that there was an obligation. In fact it was referred above her as well. It was such a big story.” She added: “I don’t think it’s my obligation to tell another adult that he should go to the police.”
Mr Hamid is charged with Mr al-Figari, 42, Mr Brown, 41, Kader Ahmed, 20, and Kibley Da Costa, 24. Atilla Ahmet, 43, has admitted soliciting murder.
How long has the world been BEGGING Muslims to stand up for what is right in their religion and push back their own internal enemies that are ripping their religion to pieces? Now you see it.
And on the other hand we have our own media, in this case, trying to hide mistakes they made and not coming forward at the time the terrorists were captured and named.
Its 5 months after the fact. Why is it the BBC held back this information?
Why did THEY not STAND UP for THEIR intuitions BEST INTERESTS and the interests of the Nation and the War On Terror?
December 5th, 2007 at 12:01 pmI wonder if she would have the same lame viewpoint had her family been targeted by these bastards.
December 5th, 2007 at 12:05 pmHmmm…Nasreen Suleamon, Maybe she’s…..
December 5th, 2007 at 12:56 pmCome on guys, she said she got the sense that he was already talking to the police. Wouldn’t that satisfy you? “I got the sense he had already turned himself in for the murder of my family”
December 5th, 2007 at 1:14 pmThe Brits have to make an example of this “woman” and prosecute her. Since when is it okay to have this kind of knowledge and remain mute? If her sister were being raped and she knew who did it, would she keep quiet because it was a Muslim? With that name, there’s no doubt she isn’t Irish-Catholic or Southern Baptist. Funny how no mention of her religion or background is mentioned. Just her name. If she were Christian with that name, you bet your ass it would have been in the article to protect her from being “profiled” by the reader. Since they left it out, she must be part of the death cult. Islam needs to be eradicated from the planet.
December 5th, 2007 at 1:25 pmI have to agree with my dear departed father on this.
That those Brits with a bit of power sold out under Chamberlain and are still the yellow striped cowardly bastards if old and damn if they are not at it again with the Muslims.
Funny thing is that they have financed and brought about their own beheadings and rapes by letting the Trojan through the gates or over the Channel…The muslims will bide their time like Mohamadoodoo and slowly kill the Brits will to live.
There is no Churchill to save them this time.
Damn shame but those that refuse to learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.
December 5th, 2007 at 7:21 pmThe reporter doesnt have the right to withold information about the commission of a crime unless it was priveldged like that between doctors and patients, or spiritual advisors and their followers.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse; this “ididnt think it was necessary…” shit is inexcuseable and she and her superiors should be arrested and tried for withholding states evidence and indirect complicity in a crime.
December 5th, 2007 at 11:54 pm