<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Speculation Why Iran May Have Halted Nuclear Weapons Program In 2003</title>
	<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/</link>
	<description>Eventually, I learned the joys of killing. But I’m skipping ahead of myself. I landed in Iraq in November 2004 armed with a video camera instead of a weapon...</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  9 Dec 2007 14:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-77472</link>
		<author>Scotty</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-77472</guid>
					<description>This is something most overlook. Even if they did halt it, one big factor for them was the fact they didnt have easy access to uranium. They have rockets to deliver it (although not needed) and they are getting the uranium to the proper enrichment levels. Once you let them do that, it would make it all to easy for them to develop a nuke. They could play it off as civilian power, for 5 years or so, then start up the nuclear program and BAM before you know it, nukes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is something most overlook. Even if they did halt it, one big factor for them was the fact they didnt have easy access to uranium. They have rockets to deliver it (although not needed) and they are getting the uranium to the proper enrichment levels. Once you let them do that, it would make it all to easy for them to develop a nuke. They could play it off as civilian power, for 5 years or so, then start up the nuclear program and BAM before you know it, nukes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian H</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-77496</link>
		<author>Brian H</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-77496</guid>
					<description>Qaddafi's program was actually SH's off-site R&#38;D plant, paid for and staffed.  When SH's plug was pulled, MQ had no other options but to cave.  

As far as Iran goes, it takes more than a little to get a deliverable device, and without testing, the chances of a squib are huge.  And Israel could retaliate X50 before the Mullahs could get in their final 5 bows to Mecca.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qaddafi&#8217;s program was actually SH&#8217;s off-site R&amp;D plant, paid for and staffed.  When SH&#8217;s plug was pulled, MQ had no other options but to cave.  </p>
<p>As far as Iran goes, it takes more than a little to get a deliverable device, and without testing, the chances of a squib are huge.  And Israel could retaliate X50 before the Mullahs could get in their final 5 bows to Mecca.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve in NC</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-77518</link>
		<author>Steve in NC</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-77518</guid>
					<description>exactly Bash, the bullshit is just amazing, it is purely an attack on the administration from within.  The thing I don't get is why Bush does not call this bullshit out in a loud and clear manner.

on the bullshit frontier, can someone explain this:

"Three town hall meetings were held over a two-day period to discuss radiation doses a limited number of 101st Airborne Division Soldiers may have been exposed to at the Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center 16 kilometers south of Baghdad during the 2005 rotation."


more info here: 

http://www.fortcampbellcourier.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news2.txt\

army info for dealing with exposure to yellow cake uranium in Iraq:

http://deploymenthealthlibrary.fhp.osd.mil/products/Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center (79).pdf

WTF?  They are having 'town hall' meetings at Fort Campbell to discuss exposure to yellow cake uranium?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly Bash, the bullshit is just amazing, it is purely an attack on the administration from within.  The thing I don&#8217;t get is why Bush does not call this bullshit out in a loud and clear manner.</p>
<p>on the bullshit frontier, can someone explain this:</p>
<p>&#8220;Three town hall meetings were held over a two-day period to discuss radiation doses a limited number of 101st Airborne Division Soldiers may have been exposed to at the Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center 16 kilometers south of Baghdad during the 2005 rotation.&#8221;</p>
<p>more info here: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.fortcampbellcourier.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news2.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.fortcampbellcourier.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news2.txt</a>\</p>
<p>army info for dealing with exposure to yellow cake uranium in Iraq:</p>
<p><a href="http://deploymenthealthlibrary.fhp.osd.mil/products/Tuwaitha" rel="nofollow">http://deploymenthealthlibrary.fhp.osd.mil/products/Tuwaitha</a> Nuclear Research Center (79).pdf</p>
<p>WTF?  They are having &#8216;town hall&#8217; meetings at Fort Campbell to discuss exposure to yellow cake uranium?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GF</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-77529</link>
		<author>GF</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-77529</guid>
					<description>The koran says it's ok to subvert and lie to the infidels. So…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The koran says it&#8217;s ok to subvert and lie to the infidels. So…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranger</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-77656</link>
		<author>Ranger</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-77656</guid>
					<description>Brian, excellent insight!  Qaddafi's behavior is eminently more understandable in that context.  Thanks buddy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, excellent insight!  Qaddafi&#8217;s behavior is eminently more understandable in that context.  Thanks buddy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-77697</link>
		<author>Dave</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 01:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-77697</guid>
					<description>Bullshit is Bullshit, I don't trust the mother fuckers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bullshit is Bullshit, I don&#8217;t trust the mother fuckers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ticticboom</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-77834</link>
		<author>ticticboom</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-77834</guid>
					<description>Smell that?

That's the tell-tale stench of taquiyya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smell that?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the tell-tale stench of taquiyya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian H</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-78138</link>
		<author>Brian H</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-78138</guid>
					<description>Ranger;
I gather that docs recovered in Iraq lay the whole thing out.  It goes further; subversion/takeover of Mauritania, on the far western tip of Africa, was to then provide a launch point from which intermediate range rockets could reach the US eastern seaboard.  The takeover failed, but not for lack of trying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ranger;<br />
I gather that docs recovered in Iraq lay the whole thing out.  It goes further; subversion/takeover of Mauritania, on the far western tip of Africa, was to then provide a launch point from which intermediate range rockets could reach the US eastern seaboard.  The takeover failed, but not for lack of trying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian H</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-78139</link>
		<author>Brian H</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/06/video-speculation-why-iran-may-have-halted-nuclear-weapons-program-in-2003/#comment-78139</guid>
					<description>BTW, the NIE report says only the Iranian military enrichment / weaponization program was "suspended".  For enrichment, military vs. civilian is a distinction without a difference.  The whole report is an exercise in weasel-wording, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, the NIE report says only the Iranian military enrichment / weaponization program was &#8220;suspended&#8221;.  For enrichment, military vs. civilian is a distinction without a difference.  The whole report is an exercise in weasel-wording, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
