Congress Defies Bush On CIA “Torture” Tapes
ABC News:
December 15, 2007
House Intelligence Committee chairman Silvestre Reyes told ABC News today that he will ignore the Bush administration’s request to drop its investigation of why CIA interrogation tapes were destroyed.
“This is an administration that frankly does not have a good track record of policing itself,” Reyes said. “We intend to go forward and issue subpoenas next week because we are a whole equal branch of government.”
After telling Congress to get out of the way, the Justice Department took the highly unusual step of telling the same thing to a federal judge.
In 2005, Judge Henry Kennedy ordered the government not to destroy any evidence of mistreatment or torture at the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The Administration says that because the destroyed tapes were interrogations of two suspects in secret CIA prisons, not at Guantanamo, the judge should not interfere.
“This is becoming increasingly bizarre,” said Jonathan Turley, a professor at George Washington University Law School. “The Justice Department insists it will essentially investigate itself and then tells the court that because it is investigating itself it won’t turn over evidence of its possible criminal misconduct. It’s so circular, it’s maddening.”
An investigation could be embarrassing to politicians in both parties who received classified briefings five years ago on interrogation tactics, possibly including waterboarding.
Some former CIA officers say Congress and the White House want the information obtained from suspected terrorists, but refuse to take the heat when the harsh methods are leaked.
And now CIA officers could face criminal charges.
“The CIA guys say we were told to do this … told to treat detainees this way. And we were told it was legal,” said Thomas Blanton, director of the National Security Archives. “Now we find out we were wrong. Now we’re taking the blame.”
When CIA agents saw politicians starting to distance themselves from the agency, some bought legal insurance policies. That now looks it might have been a smart investment.
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
I’m pretty sure it was that Turdley I saw on O’Reilley the other night. I really wanted to knock his fucking teeth down his throat. O’Reilley kept telling him he’s getting into to all that “theory” stuff.
December 16th, 2007 at 1:42 amThe House Intelligence Committee? Isn’t that an oxymoron?
More political theatre from the slumber party in an election year. Despite the CIA’s attempts to shield our covert operatives ID’s, is this useless Congressional body now going to lift their popularity numbers from 21 to 22% by making asses out of themselves and wasting more taxpayer money on a non-issue for the next 6 weeks?
Fire these mofos and give them a job that they might be good at….like street sweeper or shithouse cleaner? WTF, over?
December 16th, 2007 at 7:02 amCIA is secret dumbasses, the place is leaking like a old boat. Start charging those that go to the press with information and the reporters with treason.
December 16th, 2007 at 8:33 amI despise the CIA, and I despise the Defeatocrats (but I repeat myself), so I’m not sure who to despise more here.
December 16th, 2007 at 3:11 pm