U.S. Senate: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Refute “Man-Made” Global Warming
The Goracle’s platform is a bunch of crap…so say over 400 prominent scientists who many also claim they have numerous colleagues that believe the same way but will not speak out for fear of retribution in the global scientific community.
Check out the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee’s reoprt which debunks the so called “consensus” on global warming. I can save you a lot of time: Global warming being man-made is a buncha hot air…
Here’s the report’s intro:
Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called “consensus” on man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore.
The new report issued by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee’s office of the GOP Ranking Member details the views of the scientists, the overwhelming majority of whom spoke out in 2007. Even the some in the establishment media now appears to be taking notice of the growing number of skeptical scientists.
In October, the Washington Post Staff Writer Juliet Eilperin conceded the obvious, writing that climate skeptics “appear to be expanding rather than shrinking.” Many scientists from around the world have dubbed 2007 as the year man-made global warming fears “bites the dust.” (LINK)
This blockbuster Senate report lists the scientists by name, country of residence, and academic/institutional affiliation. It also features their own words, biographies, and weblinks to their peer reviewed studies and original source materials as gathered from public statements, various news outlets, and websites in 2007. This new “consensus busters” report is poised to redefine the debate.
Many of the scientists featured in this report consistently stated that numerous colleagues shared their views, but they will not speak out publicly for fear of retribution. Atmospheric scientist Dr. Nathan Paldor, Professor of Dynamical Meteorology and Physical Oceanography at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, author of almost 70 peer-reviewed studies, explains how many of his fellow scientists have been intimidated.
“Many of my colleagues with whom I spoke share these views and report on their inability to publish their skepticism in the scientific or public media,” Paldor wrote.
FULL SENATE EPW COMMITTEE REORT HERE.
Finally, scientists standing up in order to stop the freight train which is MAN MADE global warming. The curtain is being pulled back on the fraud that there is a concensus on the subject.
More of this and we will see the blunting of this club of the environmental moonbats that we are being beaten over the head with day in and day out.
Beers for all 400.
December 20th, 2007 at 8:25 amThe global warming nuts just got a victory with the new energy package recently signed into law. The short version of the bill is it’s all about conservation - nothing about growing an economy or expanding energy resources.
December 20th, 2007 at 8:51 amLancelot (from Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice, 1600)
“…truth will come to light; murder cannot be hid long; a man’s son may, but at the length truth will out.”
The Goracle can carp and scream (by the way, nice Photoshop job on His Highness!), but in the end the truth will come to prominence. Man-made global warming is pure horseshit. Belief in it is no different than belief in racism or the flatness of the Earth. No matter how many people sing the lyrics, nor how exalted its proponents, this song will die because its composer is a moron.
December 20th, 2007 at 9:13 amManbearpig can carp all he wants. His non-theory on Global Warming has been debunked ad nauseum. Seems the only fools still subscribing to this nonsense are people who haven’t studied it like the Fed, the schools, LLLMSM, Heidi Cullen and this blow-hard.
There’s way more than 400 scientists who don’t belive this Algorism. Hell, the Goracle couldn’t even get past Divinity school, and I’m suppose to believe he’s now morphed into a weatherman? Bwahahahahahaha…not lately.
There is no consensus in science. It doesn’t exist, except in the minds of carnival-barkers like man-bearpig and tree-hugging goof-balls like Ms Cullen. And she should stick to what her degrees are in: Eastern Religions and History and leave the science to scientists like these 400 smart folks.
December 20th, 2007 at 9:23 amThe history of “consensus” by scientists is full of errors. In Jefferson’s day the scientific concensus was that rocks (meteorites) couldn’t fall from the sky: http://www.mysteriousnewzealand.com/featurearticles/featart_meteorites.html
and in the 1800’s to early 1900’s phrenology was quite popular:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrenology
Bob Carter’s take on Global Warming:
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOLkze-9GcI
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vN06JSi-SW8
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCXDISLXTaY
Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpQQGFZHSno
The problem is that this is something some people have taken hold of to advance their own tyrannical agenda. They want to believe it. Once the world starts obviously cooling again they will just find a different approach. The Global Warming hype is a symptom, and debunking it doesn’t address the root cause of the Moonbat psyche.
December 20th, 2007 at 9:45 amGlobal Warming or not we should still cut down on the pollution.
December 20th, 2007 at 10:14 amThis is blasphemy to their global-warming cult
December 20th, 2007 at 10:20 am@T Double Dash
I know no one who is against conservation and pollution reduction. After all I enjoy clean air, clean water and a more beautiful environment. It is the draconian measures that these alarmists wish to impose that will only hurt the poor, humanity in general, and even the very environment that they espouse to want to save.
Bio-fuels are a great example of this. The higher prices for these crops encourage more land use for farming(cutting of rainforests, erosion, etc.), costs a great deal in refining and the amount of energy that is used to refine it is rediculous. I encourage the further research in this field to wean us off fossil fuels but to push it too soon is a bad idea.
I like to think I am a reasonable rational person who appreciates the environment but not at the expense for the common good. If you are an environmentalist just read this article.
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/6/27/9325/57114
December 20th, 2007 at 11:12 am40 years ago, it was the comming ice age. Now it is man-made global warming. JFC, hasn’t anyone yet figured out that the we have NO control of the weather yet? The so-called scientists can’t even get a 10-day extended forecast right. And don’t get me started on inaccurate long-range hurricane forecasts over the last two years.
Maybe someone should share with the Goracle the real secret of warming and cooling trends on this planet. It is called the sun.
If we can’t control influence where a storm goes, or where it stops, how in the fuck can a puny human do any more than just watch the storms pass over?
Being a good steward of the environment has nothing to do with man-made global anything. Picking up your trash, recycling, clean power…all are good things a good steward should do. But don’t push that goracle theory off on me by adding a larger taxburden or putting some weasel bureaucrat in the UN over me and mine.
And manbearpig abd his big green carnival machine ain’t get a dime from me. He can shove his carbon credit scheme up his fat ass.
December 20th, 2007 at 11:57 am“And manbearpig abd his big green carnival machine ain’t get a dime from me. He can shove his carbon credit scheme up his fat ass.”
Meow!
December 20th, 2007 at 12:17 pmapart of the different views on “global warming” or “global icing”, we should take care of our environnement, because it’s an alive environnement, and because we are living in it, we are part of it, not as a superior being, just an equal part of it, whe should not spoil the other parts, spare them for the future generations ;
according to history we know that there were forests in a country like Lebanon, and since more than 2000 years, they disappeared, cause of construcions, cause of ships manufacturings… and there are other numerous exemples of human destruction somewhere else, and that the disapeearings of the natural environnement created problems of heat and dryness that wasn’t solved since… so if you don’t need to destruct an environnement, have the respect of the primitiv beings, respect the nature
December 20th, 2007 at 12:38 pmThe flame actually came out his ass.
December 20th, 2007 at 1:58 pmAnybody with the slightest care about the environment can merely look at the “science” behind the global warming scare and will find it hysterically preposterous.
We have CBCs in our water. Mercury. There is no doubt that the environment is being fucked up beyond belief. My only aggravation with the Goracle crowd is that they are distracting the world from the true problems we face.
This whole global warming bullshit is PREVENTING US from doing what needs to be done to help our environment. It is a political scam to debilitate the US economically, to prevent the poor around the world from getting affordable power, and to prevent 3rd world countries from fighting malaria.
Al Gore deserves the Nobel prize like I deserve the fucking Pulitzer! Touchy-feely bullshit, once again, prevents thinking people from doing something that makes a positive difference.
The manbearpig-worshipping bastard should be sh t!
December 20th, 2007 at 4:00 pmFranchi summed it up perfectly. “because it’s an alive environnement, and because we are living in it, we are part of it,” Although I disagree with what you said about being an equal part. We are so insignificant to the power of mother nature. The forces at work to regulate this planet’s atmosphere are so great, and so adaptable and alive, it is nearly, I stress nearly impossible for man to have any significant GLOBAL affect on it. Sure we can screw up a few small things here or there but there is just no way we could destroy the whole planet.
December 20th, 2007 at 4:23 pmmartymar
your right, it’s all about energy, I didn’t mean we are equal as far as strength is concerned, but rather for the inner composition of the earth material : atoms organisations, that we can find in the diverse shapes of the nature ; exemple : the shape of a sea anemone and a snow crystal look the same ; well, sorry, I haven’t got the right vocabular to express my view, just a guess
December 20th, 2007 at 4:57 pm@Kevin M:
“Al Gore deserves the Nobel prize like I deserve the fucking Pulitzer! Touchy-feely bullshit, once again, prevents thinking people from doing something that makes a positive difference.”
Dittos on the Meow
December 20th, 2007 at 5:26 pm@Franchie
December 20th, 2007 at 5:40 pmGotcha. I agree. We are all entangled together in this world. We do need to be good stewards of it.
and by the way franchie, your vocabulary is just fine.
December 20th, 2007 at 5:41 pm“The Goracle’s platform is a bunch of crap…so say over 400 prominent scientists who many also claim they have numerous colleagues that believe the same way but will not speak out for fear of retribution in the global scientific community.”
These people really don’t like the truth, do they…?
December 20th, 2007 at 5:51 pmGotta give Senator James Inhofe (R) of Oklahoma a lot of credit for keeping the opposing side of the “Climate Change” / GW debate alive in Congress, or else they would have rail-roaded over us with damn GW taxes by now.
The man did, and continues to do, his homework on the subject.
December 20th, 2007 at 7:21 pm