<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iran Insists On High-Level Iraq Talks With U.S.</title>
	<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/24/iran-insists-on-high-level-iraq-talks-with-us-2/</link>
	<description>Eventually, I learned the joys of killing. But I’m skipping ahead of myself. I landed in Iraq in November 2004 armed with a video camera instead of a weapon...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Phil N Blanx</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/24/iran-insists-on-high-level-iraq-talks-with-us-2/#comment-85318</link>
		<author>Phil N Blanx</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 20:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/24/iran-insists-on-high-level-iraq-talks-with-us-2/#comment-85318</guid>
					<description>Iran should change their name to the more appropriate Iwant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iran should change their name to the more appropriate Iwant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cunningham</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/24/iran-insists-on-high-level-iraq-talks-with-us-2/#comment-85322</link>
		<author>John Cunningham</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 20:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/24/iran-insists-on-high-level-iraq-talks-with-us-2/#comment-85322</guid>
					<description>We're not at war with iran, yet.  So what's to talk about?  What part of stay on your side of the border don't these miserable, fucking iranians understand?  Come over to Iraq and you're going to get killed.  And that Crocker seems to be too much a wimp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re not at war with iran, yet.  So what&#8217;s to talk about?  What part of stay on your side of the border don&#8217;t these miserable, fucking iranians understand?  Come over to Iraq and you&#8217;re going to get killed.  And that Crocker seems to be too much a wimp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cb10</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/24/iran-insists-on-high-level-iraq-talks-with-us-2/#comment-85332</link>
		<author>cb10</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 21:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/24/iran-insists-on-high-level-iraq-talks-with-us-2/#comment-85332</guid>
					<description>The top rag head mullah in Iran must be getting a little nervous, along with his munchkin sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The top rag head mullah in Iran must be getting a little nervous, along with his munchkin sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/24/iran-insists-on-high-level-iraq-talks-with-us-2/#comment-85463</link>
		<author>James</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 08:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/24/iran-insists-on-high-level-iraq-talks-with-us-2/#comment-85463</guid>
					<description>Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich delivered the following remarks to a Jewish National Fund meeting Nov. 15 at the Selig Center: 

And so you have an Iranian regime which is cited annually as the leading supporter of state terrorism in the world. Every year the State Department says that. It's an extraordinary act of lucidity on the part of an institution which seeks to avoid it as often as possible. 

And you have Gen. Petraeus come to the U.S. Congress and say publicly in an open session, "The Iranians are waging a proxy war against Americans in Iraq."

I was so deeply offen ded by this, it's hard for me to express it without sounding irrational. I'm an Army brat. My dad served 27 years in the infantry. The idea that an American general would come to the American Congress, testify in public that our young men and women are being killed by Iran, and we have done nothing, I find absolutely abhorrent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich delivered the following remarks to a Jewish National Fund meeting Nov. 15 at the Selig Center: </p>
<p>And so you have an Iranian regime which is cited annually as the leading supporter of state terrorism in the world. Every year the State Department says that. It&#8217;s an extraordinary act of lucidity on the part of an institution which seeks to avoid it as often as possible. </p>
<p>And you have Gen. Petraeus come to the U.S. Congress and say publicly in an open session, &#8220;The Iranians are waging a proxy war against Americans in Iraq.&#8221;</p>
<p>I was so deeply offen ded by this, it&#8217;s hard for me to express it without sounding irrational. I&#8217;m an Army brat. My dad served 27 years in the infantry. The idea that an American general would come to the American Congress, testify in public that our young men and women are being killed by Iran, and we have done nothing, I find absolutely abhorrent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted B</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/24/iran-insists-on-high-level-iraq-talks-with-us-2/#comment-85468</link>
		<author>Ted B</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 08:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/24/iran-insists-on-high-level-iraq-talks-with-us-2/#comment-85468</guid>
					<description>Let's send Barack, he has a unique insight to these people.

We have to start thinking of our own benefit here; what do we gain from talking with Iran?  Takiyya?  No thanks.  If anything we should talk to them by grabbing them by the belt buckle and getting in their face and telling them to cut the shit before bombs start magically going off in Tehran.  I'm sure we have some of those shaped charges that Iran is supplying the jihadis, how about some of them going off in Iran?  Turnabout is fair play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s send Barack, he has a unique insight to these people.</p>
<p>We have to start thinking of our own benefit here; what do we gain from talking with Iran?  Takiyya?  No thanks.  If anything we should talk to them by grabbing them by the belt buckle and getting in their face and telling them to cut the shit before bombs start magically going off in Tehran.  I&#8217;m sure we have some of those shaped charges that Iran is supplying the jihadis, how about some of them going off in Iran?  Turnabout is fair play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan (The Infidel)</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/24/iran-insists-on-high-level-iraq-talks-with-us-2/#comment-85550</link>
		<author>Dan (The Infidel)</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 19:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2007/12/24/iran-insists-on-high-level-iraq-talks-with-us-2/#comment-85550</guid>
					<description>And what would Ahmedwithadickinhisass be serving with these high-level talks? Main course: Lots of kitma and tagyiya. Maybe a light snack of hudna?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what would Ahmedwithadickinhisass be serving with these high-level talks? Main course: Lots of kitma and tagyiya. Maybe a light snack of hudna?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
