Obama: I’ll Be The Shit As Chief Elf

December 24th, 2007 Posted By Pat Dollard.

obamasanta.jpg

GREENFIELD, Iowa (AP) - As holiday shoppers hunted for safe toys Sunday, Democrat Barack Obama touted his plan for tighter regulation of Chinese-made playthings, millions of which have been recalled because of unsafe levels of lead.

Obama said he would test to find toys with lead-based paint and ban those with even trace amounts of the substance.

“Now don’t get me wrong, as president I will work with China to keep harmful toys off our shelves,” Obama said. “But I’ll also immediately take steps to ensure that all toys are independently tested before they reach our shores and I’ll significantly increase penalties on companies that break the rules.”

“The more toys we import from China, the more risk to our children,” said Obama, an Illinois senator. “As president I will act with urgency to protect our children from being harmed by unsafe toys.”

Obama used a pre-Christmas swing through western Iowa to call for bolstering consumer protection efforts against toys from China; his campaign said up to 80 percent of the toys sold in America are made there. Background documents provided by the campaign said up to 400,000 children each year suffer some form of lead poisoning, underscoring the need for independent inspection of those toys.

After the appearances, he was headed home to Chicago and joked about power-shopping on Christmas Eve.

“I’m going to have to do all of mine tomorrow. It’s going to be tough,” Obama said.

Iowa voters launch the presidential nominating season with precinct caucuses on Jan. 3, and most polls show Obama, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina locked in a tight, yet fluid, race.

When Obama asked for the undecideds in the audience of about 200 to show their hands, roughly one-third did.

Besides the promise of improved toy safety, the Democratic presidential candidate also argued for trade policies that are tougher and with more environmental standards and protections for workers.

Still, Obama sought distinctions with rivals Clinton and Edwards, though he softened the edges a bit. On Saturday, Obama criticized Edwards, saying he didn’t have the record to back up the populist rhetoric he uses on the campaign trail.

Obama also said Edwards allowed an independent group to launch a $750,000 ad campaign for him in Iowa while decrying such practices on the stump.

Asked about the criticism, Obama noted that Edwards has asked the group, the Alliance for a New America, to halt the advertising effort. Two former Edwards advisers have been counseling labor-backed groups that are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars in issue ads supportive of Edwards.

“He said yesterday that he was going to ask him to do it, so my attitude is if you can’t get your former campaign manager and political director to do what you’d like then it’s going to be hard to get the insurance companies and drug companies to do what you want,” Obama said.

Obama also argued that he has not been forced to apologize for any of his issue positions or votes. That was an apparent reference to Edwards and Clinton. Edwards has apologized for voting for to authorize the use of force against Iraq when he served in the Senate; Clinton has been criticized for refusing to apologize for voting the same way. Her Democratic presidential rivals also have assailed Clinton for voting to designate Iran’s Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization.

“I’m not the one who has to apologize for votes I made not standing up to Republicans,” Obama said. “And I think voters should feel pretty confident that when I feel strongly about an issue, I’m going to stand my ground.”

That drew a rebuke from Edwards strategist Jennifer O’Malley Dillon. “It’s no coincidence that as John Edwards rises in the polls, Senator Obama is resorting to harsh attacks,” she said.

Obama urged his supporters to discard caution and take a chance on bringing about change.

“If we’re serious about winning this election, then we can’t live in fear of losing it,” he said at a rally with about 150 people in Harlan later in the day. “We have to think bold.”


    • Young Americans Documentary
    • Learn More About Pat
    • blogroll

      • A Soldier's Perspective
      • American Soldier
      • Ann Coulter
      • Attack Machine
      • Bill Ardolino
      • Bill Roggio
      • Black Five
      • Blonde Sagacity
      • Breitbart
      • Chicagoray
      • Confederate Yankee
      • Day by Day Cartoon
      • Euphoric Reality
      • Flopping Aces
      • Free Republic
      • Frontier Web Design
      • Hot Air
      • Hugh Hewitt
      • Ian Schwartz
      • Instapundit
      • Little Green Footballs
      • Matt Sanchez
      • Michael Fumento
      • Michael Yon
      • Michelle Malkin
      • Military.com
      • Missiles And Stilletos
      • Move America Forward
      • Mudville Gazette
      • Pass The Ammo
      • Roger L. Simon
      • Sportsman's Outfit
      • Stop The ACLU
      • TCOverride
      • The Belmont Club
      • The Big God Blog
      • The Crimson Blog
      • The Daily Gut
      • The Drudge Report
      • The PoliTicking Timebomb
      • The Pundit Review

7 Responses

  1. cb10

    WTF happened to “gravitas”
    This lightweight empty suit has no shame. He obviously too dumb to make it as a dirt bag lawyer so it became a politician.
    Bomb Pakistan and worry about toy’s, really has his priorities worked out.
    Oh yeah, he also understands “those folks.”
    Gravitas my ass.

  2. Ted B

    I’m sorry, did he say something?

    The more I hear this guy’s ‘positions’, and extremely few of those I might add, the more vapid he sounds. They are dwelling on meaningless minutea like toys from China. Don’t we have a bit more to worry about? I want to know what they are going to do for the economy and winning the war, but they want to play it safe with hitting the underhand pitches, shoot, T-ball… :roll:

  3. Gooddad

    No lead, no ammo. Think about, it why all of a sudden this war on lead?

  4. Dave

    Where’s the gravitas, we heard that about GW for months, that’s my question.

  5. Ted B

    Like, gravitas is soooooo 2000. :roll:

  6. Dan (The Infidel)

    Poor man…he really should seek treatment for that Cranial Rectal Inversion problem that he has. Gravitas is the least of his concerns.

  7. Lamplighter

    OK, he’s going to put this much energy into detecting trace amounts of lead in toys. What does he care? He’s for murdering babies right before they are born (partial birth abortion). He’s been a stalwart, stanch defender of the practice in both the IL legislature and US Senate. The two don’t add up.

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen::neutral::twisted::arrow::shock::smile::???::cool::evil::grin::idea::oops::razz::roll::wink::cry::eek::lol::mad::sad::!::?::beer: