South Korea Votes To Fight Iraq War For At Least Another Year

December 29th, 2007 Posted By Pat Dollard.

iraq-skoreax-large.jpg

USA Today:

SEOUL — South Korea’s parliament voted Friday to extend the country’s troop deployment in Iraq for another year, amid protests by activists opposed to the decision.

The 298-member National Assembly approved the extension of the country’s deployment of 650 troops by a vote of 146-104. Six lawmakers abstained and 42 lawmakers did not show up for the vote.

President Roh Moo-hyun announced the extension plan in October, saying it would solidify South Korea’s alliance with the United States amid the North Korean nuclear standoff and boost economic interests in Iraq.

“We can’t help paying attention to the North Korean nuclear issue,” Hwang Jin-ha, a member of the conservative opposition Grand National Party, told parliament before the vote. He said closer cooperation with the U.S. is crucial as North Korea threatened to slow its disabling of nuclear facilities due to delayed aid.

South Korea has stationed troops in Iraq for a reconstruction mission since 2003 at the request of Washington, which has 28,000 troops based in South Korea as deterrent against North Korea. In September, U.S. President George W. Bush asked Roh to consider the extension at their summit meeting in Sydney, saying the South Korean contingent in Iraq has a high reputation for its expertise.

FIND MORE STORIES IN: Iraq | North Korea | South Korea | Seoul | South Korean | Korean | Roh Moo-Hyun
The South’s troops level once stood at 3,600, making it the largest U.S. largest coalition partner after Britain. However, the Seoul government has gradually brought soldiers home due to anti-deployment sentiments that peaked when Islamic insurgents beheaded a South Korean civilian working in Iraq in 2004, amid militant demands for a troop withdrawal.

South Korea recently withdrew about 600 troops from Iraq, setting the current troop level at 650, according to the office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in Seoul.

Liberal lawmakers criticized Roh — their former ideological ally who once pledged not to “kowtow” the U.S. — for taking part in an unjustified war.

“With endless guerrilla wars, Iraq is plunging into a swamp of war,” said Lim Jong-seok, a member of the United New Democratic Party.

Earlier Friday, dozens of anti-war activists staged a protest near the National Assembly in Seoul, calling on lawmakers to reject the extension plan.

“Zaytun, it’s time to return home!” shouted the activists, referring to the contingent’s code name, the Arabic word for “olive.” There were reports of clashes.

If parliament had rejected the extension proposal, all South Korean soldiers would have been obligated to return home, said parliamentary official Oh Byung-hyuck.

Earlier this month, South Korea brought home 195 army medics and engineers from Afghanistan, ending its five-year deployment to help rebuild the war-ravaged country also at Washington’s request.

Seoul wrapped up the troop deployment by the end of this year as planned but earlier this year reconfirmed the pledge to the Taliban to win the freedom of 21 civilians kidnapped in July after the insurgents killed two hostages.

(AP)


    • Young Americans Documentary
    • Learn More About Pat
    • blogroll

      • A Soldier's Perspective
      • Ace Of Spades
      • American Soldier
      • Ann Coulter
      • Attack Machine
      • Bill Ardolino
      • Bill Roggio
      • Black Five
      • Blonde Sagacity
      • Breitbart
      • Chicagoray
      • Confederate Yankee
      • Day by Day Cartoon
      • Euphoric Reality
      • Flopping Aces
      • Free Republic
      • Frontier Web Design
      • Hot Air
      • Hugh Hewitt
      • Ian Schwartz
      • Instapundit
      • Jules Crittenden
      • Little Green Footballs
      • Matt Sanchez
      • Michael Fumento
      • Michael Yon
      • Michelle Malkin
      • Military.com
      • Missiles And Stilletos
      • Move America Forward
      • Mudville Gazette
      • Pass The Ammo
      • Protest Warrior
      • Roger L. Simon
      • Sportsman's Outfit
      • Stop The ACLU
      • TCOverride
      • The Belmont Club
      • The Big God Blog
      • The Crimson Blog
      • The Daily Gut
      • The Drudge Report
      • The PoliTicking Timebomb
      • The Pundit Review
      • Veteran's Affairs Documentary

2 Responses

  1. Egfrow

    I find it odd that it takes a vote of 140 odd people to to approve the deployment of just 650!

  2. Brian H

    It seems a few there are aware on which side their bread and future are buttered. SK’s need for oil and huge shipbuilding and construction capacity make it a natural partner for Iraq. May Syria and Iran have much joy of their association with the North. :twisted:

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen::neutral::twisted::arrow::shock::smile::???::cool::evil::grin::idea::oops::razz::roll::wink::cry::eek::lol::mad::sad::!::?::beer::beer: