<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Ten Combat Rifles Of All Time #10-#7</title>
	<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/</link>
	<description>Eventually, I learned the joys of killing. But I’m skipping ahead of myself. I landed in Iraq in November 2004 armed with a video camera instead of a weapon...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reign in Blood</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92884</link>
		<author>Reign in Blood</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92884</guid>
					<description>What?!?  Just went through all three of them and they don't have the BAR anywhere?  That just doesn't seem right.  I would think it would be on the list over the STEYR AUG, the M14 or the Lee-Enfield.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?!?  Just went through all three of them and they don&#8217;t have the BAR anywhere?  That just doesn&#8217;t seem right.  I would think it would be on the list over the STEYR AUG, the M14 or the Lee-Enfield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregGS</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92893</link>
		<author>GregGS</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92893</guid>
					<description>I think BAR=M14</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think BAR=M14</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reign in Blood</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92900</link>
		<author>Reign in Blood</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92900</guid>
					<description>The BAR was developed in 1917, 40 years before the M14 and fired a .30-06 round compared to the 7.62 round.  Completely different weapon.  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browning_Automatic_Rifle

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M14_rifle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BAR was developed in 1917, 40 years before the M14 and fired a .30-06 round compared to the 7.62 round.  Completely different weapon.  </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browning_Automatic_Rifle" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browning_Automatic_Rifle</a></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M14_rifle" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M14_rifle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reign in Blood</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92901</link>
		<author>Reign in Blood</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92901</guid>
					<description>I also think that the Thompson should be in the top 10 over a couple of the others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think that the Thompson should be in the top 10 over a couple of the others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reign in Blood</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92903</link>
		<author>Reign in Blood</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92903</guid>
					<description>Well, I guess the Thompson wouldn't fall under the definition of a rifle, so that would explain that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess the Thompson wouldn&#8217;t fall under the definition of a rifle, so that would explain that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRM</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92906</link>
		<author>TRM</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92906</guid>
					<description>The Steyr AUG doesn't deserve a place on this list.  Where is the Mosin-Nagant M91/30?  It should be above or near the Kar-98.  I'll assume that for this list, the M2 doesn't count as a "rifle," though I have seen pictures of the ma deuce with optics in Korea  :mrgreen:   This list is flawed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Steyr AUG doesn&#8217;t deserve a place on this list.  Where is the Mosin-Nagant M91/30?  It should be above or near the Kar-98.  I&#8217;ll assume that for this list, the M2 doesn&#8217;t count as a &#8220;rifle,&#8221; though I have seen pictures of the ma deuce with optics in Korea  <img src='/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' />   This list is flawed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregGS</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92915</link>
		<author>GregGS</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92915</guid>
					<description>You'd think the barrett rifles would make the list as a dominate force in today war theater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d think the barrett rifles would make the list as a dominate force in today war theater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PDizzle</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92931</link>
		<author>PDizzle</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92931</guid>
					<description>I like the option to have spent shell casings eject to the left or right, like the Steyr.  Shoothing 16's and M4's as a left handed shot sucks because the gas from the breach blasts right back in your face.  I wish we could do something like that for our weapons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the option to have spent shell casings eject to the left or right, like the Steyr.  Shoothing 16&#8217;s and M4&#8217;s as a left handed shot sucks because the gas from the breach blasts right back in your face.  I wish we could do something like that for our weapons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92979</link>
		<author>jeremy</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-92979</guid>
					<description>PDizzle, Stag Arms makes completely left handed AR-15s. The guys in the Army are still out of luck though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PDizzle, Stag Arms makes completely left handed AR-15s. The guys in the Army are still out of luck though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C-Low</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-93013</link>
		<author>C-Low</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 05:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-93013</guid>
					<description>I think the BAR was probably not mentioned because it was developed as a light machine gun.  I would wager that in the follow up countdown for machine guns it will rank in the top 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the BAR was probably not mentioned because it was developed as a light machine gun.  I would wager that in the follow up countdown for machine guns it will rank in the top 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GBU43</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-93019</link>
		<author>GBU43</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 05:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-93019</guid>
					<description>What no BAR or Garand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What no BAR or Garand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-93031</link>
		<author>jim</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 06:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/01/11/top-ten-combat-rifles-of-all-time-10-7/#comment-93031</guid>
					<description>STG 77 is a good weopen and were widely used and still are

This list is about production and how many were actually used in combat

It's odd as I was just watching a video about this yesterday</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STG 77 is a good weopen and were widely used and still are</p>
<p>This list is about production and how many were actually used in combat</p>
<p>It&#8217;s odd as I was just watching a video about this yesterday</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
