Zawahiri And The Internet Q & A
Recently Al Qaeda’s #2 dickhead Ayman al-Zawahiri said “Hey! Send your questions to my website, I’ll answer them!”
Well all of the questions that were posted by the cutoff date of january 16th were viewable to all, but now that the date has passed, they have been taken down with no answers yet from Bump-head.
As I read the questions, many things became apparent to me.
For one thing, it appears that Al Qaeda has more members in it’s “Sympathy” wing than on its actual membership list (so to speak). Questions that reveal how in the dark all the idiots who are sympathetic to AQ, how disjointed many of these jihadis around the world really are, and also an underlying tone of uncertainty and a blind-devotee mentality.
There was also a complaint from a supposed former Arab al Qaeda fighter in Iraq, that whined about Iraqi fighters discriminating against non-Iraqi mujahedeen.
Oh, waaaa…just hold still while we make the proper coordinate adjustments.
From an article on CNN.com:
CAIRO, Egypt – Judging by hundreds of questions submitted online to al Qaeda’s No. 2 leader, it seems the terror network’s self-proclaimed supporters are as much in the dark about the its operations and plans as Western analysts and intelligence agencies.
Among their concerns: Where will it strike next? Does it control small militant groups in the Mideast and Europe? Why hasn’t it hit America again?
Al Qaeda’s media arm, Al-Sahab, announced last month that Osama bin Laden’s deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, would take questions from the public in an “online interview.”
More than 900 entries, some with multiple questions, were posted on a militant Web site before the January 16 deadline.
So far, al Qaeda hasn’t given any answers. Al Qaeda said only that al-Zawahiri would respond “as soon as possible,” and the questions disappeared from the site after the cutoff date without any response.
It is impossible to confirm independently whether any of questioners are really active fighters. Nor is it possible to verify that the interview offer really came from al-Zawahiri, although it was posted with the logo of Al-Sahab, which issues his videotapes.
But the questions focused on the same issues that Western terrorism experts have long debated, including how much direct support and command al-Zawahiri and bin Laden give to militants in Arab countries and Europe.
Like many in the West, the questioners appear uncertain whether al Qaeda’s central leadership directly controls the multiple, small militant groups around the Mideast and Europe that work in its name, or whether those groups operate on their own.
Others queries sought advice: Should followers be focusing their jihad, or holy war, against Arab regimes, or against Americans?
Some wanted to know when al Qaeda will be more active in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Syria?
One, allegedly a former Arab al Qaeda fighter in Iraq, complained about Iraqi fighters discriminating against non-Iraqi mujahedeen.
Journalists also were invited to send questions and a few of the entries were labeled with the names of European and Asian newspapers.
“When we will see the men of al Qaeda waging holy war in Palestine? Because frankly our situation has become very bad,” wrote one, with the username “Seeking the Path.”
Another, signed “Osama the Lion,” asked: “Why doesn’t al Qaeda open a front in Egypt, where there are wide opportunities and fertile ground for drawing in mujahedeen?”
Another, called “Knight of Islam,” asked, “We are awaiting a strike against American soil. Why has that not been done? Why are the Jews in the world not struck?”
A few who wrote in claimed to be active fighters in militant groups. One, with the username “Phenixshadow,” described himself as a member of the al Qaeda branch in North Africa that has been blamed for attacks in Algeria.
“What do you expect from us? Should we follow the instruction of the mother organization to target the ‘far enemy’ — the Zionist-Crusader (America) — or do we focus our efforts on the apostate regime (Algeria)? Or do you advise a middle path of striking both enemies?” he asked.
Another, signed “Alfirati60,” said he is a Syrian who joined al Qaeda in Iraq before its leader, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, was killed by a U.S. airstrike in 2006.
The writer complained bitterly about al Qaeda’s decision to form an umbrella group with other Iraqi insurgents known as “The Islamic State of Iraq.”
“Things got worse after the organization joined the Islamic State, when Iraqis took over all the issues,” he wrote.
The Iraqis care “only about liberating Iraq not about establishing God’s law,” an apparent reference to the al Qaeda goal of a single Islamic state. “Indeed, they neglected many of the (non-Iraqi) brothers since they care only about the safety of Iraqis and Iraq.”
“So I ask you, our sheik, is this just?” he added. “There are many, many violations of Sharia Islamic law that those (Iraqis) who join the Islamic State commit, like failing to kill spies or apostates” — those who work with Americans — “because they are Iraqis.”
He wrote that he left Iraq and returned to “Sham,” the old Arabic name for Syria and Lebanon. “I’m sorry to go on and on, our sheik, but you should be informed of what’s going on” in Iraq, he said. “We want to act in the Sham, and we are ready to do so. We lack only the material and moral support from you.”
Another questioner asked: “We hear a lot about the non-centralization of al Qaeda,” one supporter wrote. “Is the loss of direct control by al Qaeda’s leadership over the jihadi cells harmful to al Qaeda? … Does al Qaeda intend to try to reassert its control?”
Others wanted to make sure al Qaeda has a long-term strategy.
“Does it just go from event to event as some claim?” asked “Raji al-Quboul.” “Do you have a body that studies events and reviews them to correct mistakes and assess them?”
Many, of course, asked about the health of bin Laden, who rarely appears on video.
Another hot topic was Iran. Several asked why al Qaeda did not attack that mainly Shiite nation. They expressed concern over rumors of an understanding between al Qaeda and Iran. “One of the lies spread to fight al-Qaeda is that al-Qaeda is linked to Iran,” one wrote. “They point to your failure to attack the Iranian regime.”
Many others simply asked for advice on how and where to join jihad. One man said he is a 23-year-old living with his divorced mother.
“I want to travel to join jihad and I sought my mother’s permission, but she would not give it to me,” he said. “Can I go without her permission?”
What a bunch of doofus’! Can I go without my mommy’s permission? It’s amazing they can pull anything of with half wits like these in their organization. I suppose it’s a measure of the anti terrorist organizations success. All the terrorist with at least half a brain are fertilizer now!
January 21st, 2008 at 3:24 pm