Cops Tell Supreme Court CCW Reduces Crime - Rape By 88%
Just a confirmation from Florida cops and prosecutors what all good Dollard Readers already know…
The brief cites a study that discovered, based on interviews with felony prisoners in 11 prisons in 10 states, one third of the felons had been “scared off, shot at, wounded or captured by an armed victim,” and nearly four in 10 had decided against committing a specific crime because they thought the victim might have a gun.
“Seventy-four percent agreed with the statement that ‘One reason burglars avoid houses where people are at home is that they fear being shot,’” the study said.
What is striking to me, however, are the stats regarding sexual assaults, check it out:
When sexual assaults started rising in Orlando, Fla., in 1966, police officers noticed women were arming themselves, so they launched a firearms safety course for them. Over the next 12 months, sexual assaults plummeted by 88 percent, burglaries fell by 25 percent and not one of the 2,500 women who took the course fired a gun in a confrontation.
And that, says a new brief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court by police officers and prosecutors in a controversial gun-ban dispute, is why gun ownership is important and should be available to individuals in the United States.
The arguments come in an amicus brief submitted by the Law Enforcement Alliance of America, whose spokesman, Ted Deeds, told WND there now are 92 different law enforcement voices speaking together to the Supreme Court in the Heller case.
That pending decision will decide whether an appeals court ruling striking down a District of Columbia ban on handguns because it violates the 2nd Amendment will stand or not. The gun ban promoters essentially argue that any gun restriction that is ruled “reasonable” is therefore constitutional, such as the D.C. handgun ban.
Deeds said this probably is the largest unified law enforcement statement in support of the 2nd Amendment ever, and includes nearly a dozen organizations that represent tens of thousands of police officers across the country, dozens of state attorneys general, dozens of prosecutors and a long list of federal law enforcement experts up to and including federal judges.
Oral arguments in the case are scheduled on March 18, and the LEAA brief is just one of 46 that have been filed on the side of seeking affirmation that the 2nd Amendment does, indeed, document a right for individuals to own guns in the United States.
The brief suggested the nation’s crime rate could rocket should more restrictions be placed on guns.
“Numerous surveys show that firearms are used (usually without a shot needing to be fired) for self-defense at least 97,000 times a year, and probably several hundred thousands times a year. The anti-crime effects of citizen handgun ownership provide enormous benefits to law enforcement, because there are fewer home invasion emergencies requiring an immediate police response, and because the substantial reductions in rates of burglary, assault, and other crimes allow the police and district attorneys to concentrate more resources on other cases and on deterrence.”
“Guns save lives,” the brief said. “In the hands of law-abiding citizens, guns provide very substantial public safety benefits. In all 50 states – but not the District – it is lawful to use firearms for defense against home invaders. The legal ownership of firearms for home defense is an important reason why the American rate of home invasion burglaries is far lower than in countries which prohibit or discourage home handgun defense.”
The brief said handgun ownership reduces the number of confrontational home invasions, so “the total U.S. violent crime rate [is reduced] by about 9 percent.”
Deeds said it’s always hard to predict the U.S. Supreme Court, but ideally the ruling would clarify the 2nd Amendment means exactly what its words say: that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed.
He compared it to the discussion of freedom of religion, should the Bible be banned. “For Christians there’s no effective freedom of religion if they didn’t have a Bible,” he said.
“To have the 2nd Amendment right on paper, but to be denied the effective means of exercising that right at a moment of truth, when you’re trying to defend yourself or your loved one from an aggressor, [is wrong,]” he said. “The gun is the only answer.”
(World Net Daily)
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
February 29th, 2008 at 9:58 amBash, as I’ve always said: having CCW makes everybody around you more “polite”.
If you assume all people are armed, all the time, you will be on your best behavior. Think of it as treating every firearm as if it were loaded.
On a side note, awesome photo!
February 29th, 2008 at 10:04 amThe Uzi girl has got legs!
February 29th, 2008 at 10:15 amWOW, who knew. I wonder if there is a big business opportunity to sell liberals signs for their houses that read “No guns in this house”.
February 29th, 2008 at 10:20 amThe brief cites a study that discovered, based on interviews with felony prisoners in 11 prisons in 10 states, one third of the felons had been “scared off, shot at, wounded or captured by an armed victim,” and nearly four in 10 had decided against committing a specific crime because they thought the victim might have a gun.
“Seventy-four percent agreed with the statement that ‘One reason burglars avoid houses where people are at home is that they fear being shot,’” the study said.
———————————————————-
AND! … Proving, once again, LAW ABIDING CITIZENS who own guns to protect themselves/family/property ARE NOT blood thirsty killers … If they were, there would NOT have been ANY of these “felony prisoners” to ask the fooking questions of!!!!!
IT’S the “Bad Guys”, stupid(s)!!!
February 29th, 2008 at 10:27 amAnother example supporting the argument that when honest people are armed dishonest people stay the fuck away from them.
February 29th, 2008 at 10:35 amFunny … I recall a story a few years back of a woman (I think she may have been threatened or attacked) who learned to use a gun and bought one …
She got so damn good with it too …
Well, she took one of those paper targets from the firing range (that she had pretty much shot the shit out of the head and heart) and hung it on her front door …
`nuff said.
February 29th, 2008 at 10:48 amno sh
t sherlock!
February 29th, 2008 at 10:53 amBob, having your CCW isn’t what is making them polite, its the fact that you are a big OLD crunchie from South Buffalo!
February 29th, 2008 at 11:34 amThe intelligent response to this article is:
Duh duh duh, duh duh duh duh duh duh, duh duh. Duh duh duh duh duh duh, duh, duh duh duh duh duh duh duh. Duh, duh duh duh, duh duh. Duh duh duh duh:
1. Duh, duh duh duh.
2. Duh duh, duh duh duh, duh duh duh duh.
3. Duh duh.
Duh duh duh, duh duh duh duh, duh duh. Duh.
February 29th, 2008 at 11:38 am………what were we talking about?
February 29th, 2008 at 11:45 ambash; that pic rocks!!! of all the mutherfuckers in this world, you the mutherfuckerest!!
February 29th, 2008 at 12:41 pmIt was true 200+ years ago and is still true today….
“The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference, they deserve a place of honor with all that is good.”— - George Washington”
Molon Labe
February 29th, 2008 at 1:17 pm“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms. . . disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. . . Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” — Jefferson’s “Commonplace Book,” 1774-1776, quoting from On Crimes and Punishment, by criminologist Cesare Beccaria, 1764
nuff said
February 29th, 2008 at 1:39 pm