Full Email Exchange Between Hillary Campaign And Shuster Over Pimping
Shuster first defended himself, as he should have, for tossing out an inocuous slang term. For me, the real story was just that the leftist MSM will now talk blatantly talk badly about Hillary, and only glowingly about Hussein, since he is now their candidate of choice.
Politico:
—–Original Message—–
From: Philippe Reines
To: David Shuster
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 7:14 p.m.
David - how hard is it for someone, anyone, in the vast MS/NBC universe to contact any one of us at the campaign for comment about Chelsea before going on air and saying that she is being “pimped out” ? It’s absurdly offensive. And what the hell does that even mean?
I just don’t get MSNBC - does GE not allow you to make toll calls? What’s the problem.
Philippe Reines
Press Secretary
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton
—–Original Message—–
From: David Shuster
To: Philippe Reines
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 8:51 p.m.
Nice to hear from you, philippe.
It is a fact that chelsea has made calls to superdelegates, as your campaign colleagues have acknowledged. It is also a fact that the campaign has reacted quite harshly to any media who have sought to interview chelsea. That was the point. By slamming any reporter who seeks to chat with chelsea while simultaneously having chelsea do campaign tasks such as trying to convince super delegates to support her mom, that’s the reference.
Chelsea is polite and does a fine job of saying “I don’t want to talk.”. But for campaign staff to then jump down the throat of a reporter who seeks to talk to chelsea…that’s an issue.
————————–
Sent using BlackBerry
—–Original Message—–
From: Philippe Reines
To: David Shuster
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 9:00 p.m.
Since you guys asked for the transcript - here specifically is what David said on air:
SHUSTER: “But doesn’t it seem like she’s being–but doesn’t it seem as if Chelsea is sort of being pimped out in some weird sort of way?”
I have a hunch that such offensive and unacceptable language was never used on MSNBC’s air about Karenna Gore, the Bush twins, Venessa & Alex Kerry, Kate Edwards, the Romney sons - or any other adult offspring who chose to campaign on behalf of a parent.
—–Original Message—–
From: Philippe Reines
To: David Shuster
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 9:16: p.m.
David - I want to make sure I’m crystal clear here - you’re saying that because she doesn’t grant interviews and makes calls on behalf of her mother, you are right to say that she is being pimped out?
I don’t need to read a the whole transcript for context, you were way out of line. Nobody’s jumping down your throat about asking for an interview or talking about calls she made. And you know it.
There is simply no excuse for being so offensive.
By actually rationalizing your behavior rather than accepting responsibility and apologizing, you become the poster child for everything wrong with tv journalism, and it’s a shame your NBC colleagues have to be associated with this (expletive).
—–Original Message—–
From: David Shuster
To: Philippe Reines
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 9:29 p.m.
No. That’s not what I’m saying. And if you bothered to look at the transcript and saw all of the glowing things I said about chelsea and the way she was raised, you would know that.
The issue is not her making calls. As + said on the air, I have no problems with that what so ever. The issue is not her refusing interviews. The issue is that the campaign has come down hard on reporters who merely sought to ask chelsea questions. You can’t have it both ways. Reporters have long respected the clintons desire that we avoid chelsea and let her have her space. But to get angry at reporters seeking to talk to her now is patently unfair. And you know that.
————————–
Sent using BlackBerry
—–Original Message—–
From: Philippe Reines
To: David Shuster
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 9:49 p.m.
I think we’ve each said what we have to say on this matter. Based on this email exchange, we’re assuming two things:
1) You are not disputing that you said on air: “But doesn’t it seem like she’s being–but doesn’t it seem as if Chelsea is sort of being pimped out in some weird sort of way?”
2) You have no intention of apologizing for the above.
And Shuster got suspended. Boring political theatre.
February 9th, 2008 at 8:07 amHe should be fired– just for being an asshole every single day.
February 9th, 2008 at 9:20 amLET’s SEE…Clintons are offended by a reference to “pimping”, UNBELIEVABLE, BILL AND HILLARY ARE THE BIGGEST POLITICAL WHORES IN HISTORY, WHY WOULD ONE BE SURPRISED IF THEY PIMPED OUT THEIR DAUGHTER OR ANY OTHER LIVING OR DEAD PERSON IF THEY BELIEVED IT WOULD HELP THEM GAIN POWER. CLINTONS OFFENDED…MONICA THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!
February 9th, 2008 at 9:27 amMan this just goes to show the fear the Clinton instill in the media. Look at all the inflammatory things said about conservatives and their families on MSNBC without a single person being suspended. One call from the Clintons and MSNBC jump to attention and gets in line. I guess we can only take solice in the fact that no one watches MSNBC anyway. In fact if Hillary had not made such an issue of it, would anyone even heard what was said?
February 9th, 2008 at 12:21 pm“In fact if Hillary had not made such an issue of it, would anyone even heard what was said?”
Or even cared for that matter.Compared to the way the media has spoken about Bush, it’s no worse that calling someone a poopie pants.
February 9th, 2008 at 2:33 pmCan’t stand the heat. Get out of the race! It’s okay for Bubba Clinton to chase young tail, but don’t say Chelsa is working it for votes! I wonder if Nino’s can put the picture back up in his resturant now that Chelsa is a public person for the sake of votes?
February 9th, 2008 at 3:04 pm