Taliban Denies Kidnapping Nuke Experts

February 14th, 2008 Posted By Pat Dollard.

taliban2_soldiers1.jpg

Feb 13, 2008 06:08 EST

ISLAMABAD, Feb 13 (Reuters) - Pakistan’s Taliban militants said on Wednesday they would not attack next week’s general election and denied involvement in the disappearance of the country’s ambassador to neighbouring Afghanistan, as well as two of Pakistan’s top nuclear weapons experts.

Fears of violence ahead of the Feb. 18 poll have risen since the assassination of opposition leader, Benazir Bhutto, on Dec. 27. More than 400 people have been killed in clashes between troops and militants and bomb attacks since the start of 2008.

“Our central leadership have decided that as we have nothing to do with the elections, therefore there would be no attacks from our people,” Pakistan Taliban spokesman Maulvi Omar told Reuters.

“Neither do we support the process of the election nor do we have any opposition to it and if any attack takes place before or on election day, our mujahid won’t be involved in it,” he said by telephone from an undisclosed location.

Omar is a spokesman for Baitullah Mehsud, the leader of the Pakistani Taliban and prime suspect for Bhutto’s assassination, though Mehsud has denied any involvement.

The spokesman announced a unilateral Taliban ceasefire a week ago. Pakistan’s military denied a truce had been agreed but there has been a lull in fighting since then.

The Pakistani Taliban also denied having anything to do with the disappearance of Tariq Azizuddin, Pakistan’s ambassador in Kabul who went missing two days ago on his way to the Afghan capital from the northwestern Pakistani city of Peshawar.

“We have no links with it. We don’t know anything about that,” Omar said.

Pakistani security forces are searching the area and officials are reluctant to say if Azizuddin has been kidnapped, though Afghan President Hamid Karzai said the envoy had been taken hostage.

Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry said it had no further information on the case and again denied media reports that the Taliban had demanded the release of captured Afghan Taliban commander Mullah Mansour Dadullah in exchange for the envoy.

The envoy was travelling through the Khyber tribal region and had been due to change cars at the frontier crossing but he never reached the border. His driver and bodyguard are also missing.

The historic Khyber Pass is the gateway on the main road to landlocked Afghanistan from northwestern Pakistan.

Khyber is notorious for smugglers and bandits, but unlike other parts of the tribal belt on the Afghan border has been relatively free of violence linked to al Qaeda and the Taliban, though militant activity has picked up in adjoining regions. (Reporting by Kamran Haider; Writing by Jon Hemming; Editing by Sanjeev Miglani)


    • Young Americans Documentary
    • Learn More About Pat
    • blogroll

      • A Soldier's Perspective
      • Ace Of Spades
      • American Soldier
      • Ann Coulter
      • Attack Machine
      • Bill Ardolino
      • Bill Roggio
      • Black Five
      • Blonde Sagacity
      • Breitbart
      • Chicagoray
      • Confederate Yankee
      • Day by Day Cartoon
      • Euphoric Reality
      • Flopping Aces
      • Free Republic
      • Frontier Web Design
      • Hot Air
      • Hugh Hewitt
      • Ian Schwartz
      • Instapundit
      • Jules Crittenden
      • Little Green Footballs
      • Matt Sanchez
      • Michael Fumento
      • Michael Yon
      • Michelle Malkin
      • Military.com
      • Missiles And Stilletos
      • Move America Forward
      • Mudville Gazette
      • Pass The Ammo
      • Protest Warrior
      • Roger L. Simon
      • Sportsman's Outfit
      • Stop The ACLU
      • TCOverride
      • The Belmont Club
      • The Big God Blog
      • The Crimson Blog
      • The Daily Gut
      • The Drudge Report
      • The PoliTicking Timebomb
      • The Pundit Review
      • Veteran's Affairs Documentary

3 Responses

  1. Dan (The Infidel)

    “Neither do we support the process of the election nor do we have any opposition to it and if any attack takes place before or on election day, our mujahid won’t be involved in it,” he said by telephone from an undisclosed location.”

    me: He’s talking out of both sides of his dirty mouth at once.

    It’s no secret that the Talibastards and AQ want material for a dirty nuke. AQ Khan is still around. Would he sell out the US and the West? Why not. He’s the one who provided Iran, Syria, Libya. and NK with Nuke technology and expertise. Why wouldn’t he help the mustifoons in AQ and the Talibastards?

    Watch an attempt by the mustifoons to seize nuclear material from one of Pakis nuke sites either as an inside job or an external attack.

    Their goal is to strike the “far enemy” (that would be the US) with either a small nuke or with a dirty bomb in a large population center like NY City.

    Their evil plan is comming together.

    Get those recon photos of Paki nuke sites out of the safe. Time to practice the scenarios for destroying and/or denying those sites to the mustifoons. What’s the TOT to each site, I wonder? Bet someone knows in the Puzzle Palace or at the NSA.

    Better hope that the soddomites don’t get into power in November. Oh did I say Sodomites? I meant Obaminites. Freudian slip on my part. :mrgreen:

  2. reaganmarine84

    BAGHDAD BOB. BAGHDAD BOB. BAGHDAD BOB.
    BUELLER. BUELLER. BUELLER.
    ANYONE.
    ANYONE.

  3. JonnyMordant

    :arrow: Dan(I)

    Yeah, I wont be holding my breath in hopes of a peaceful election day in Pakistan either!

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen::neutral::twisted::arrow::shock::smile::???::cool::evil::grin::idea::oops::razz::roll::wink::cry::eek::lol::mad::sad::!::?::beer::beer: