2nd Amendment A 2nd Class Right?
It’s a funny thing about the Bill of Rights. Rather than view each Amendment’s protections as equally valid, many (but not all) liberals tend to enshrine some as sacrosanct but dismiss others at antiquated. Hence the First and Fourth amendments and their protections of free speech and press and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure respectively are held in extremely high regard, with state or federal restrictions on these rights held to strict scrutiny. But the Second Amendment and the right to keep and bears arms, eh, not so much.
But shouldn’t a major newspaper like the Los Angeles Times take due care to not echo that line of thinking in its reporting? Above at right is a screen capture for a teaser headline on the L.A. Times Web page that hints that the First Amendment’s protections are more iron-clad in their nature as individual rights than the Second’s guarantee of firearm ownership rights.
What’s more, in the third paragraph of reporter David Savage’s article, the writer seems to suggest the Second Amendment does not guarantee the right to keep and bear arms because, well, the Supreme Court hasn’t said as much:
The case [Heller v. District of Coumbia] has drawn wide attention not because of the district’s law itself, but because the court may decide for the first time whether gun rights are truly protected by the Constitution, like the right to free speech and the right to freely practice one’s religion.
Otherwise, Savage did a fairly decent job representing both sides of the Heller handgun ban case, and it is true that the Supreme Court does not have an extensive history of case law on the Second Amendment to the extent that it does on the First, Fourth, or Fifth. But just because the Court has not made numerous rulings striking down affronts to free speech or freedom from unreasonable search and seizure does not mean that gun rights are non-existent for a dearth of Court precedent.
Isn’t it kind of like saying that prior to rulings overturning flag burning bans and protecting animal sacrifice that free speech and freedom of religion were not “truly protected” by the Constitution?
From an article by Ken Shepherd at Newsbusters.
Nods to drillanwr.
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
SUPPORT THE SECOND AMENDMENT BUY A GUN TODAY, BUY A GUN A MONTH!!!!!!!! I JUST PICKED UP A KIMBER ULTRA CARRY II….A SWEET PIECE.
March 17th, 2008 at 9:54 amIf they ever try and ban the right to bear arms, they will have to come and take my rifles from my hands
March 17th, 2008 at 10:12 amMike.
March 17th, 2008 at 10:34 amThey will.
Storm.
I’m 42 years old with a clean record. I’m watching to see if I’m legislated into a felon. This shit is for real, gentelmen. The feds and the state know exactly where my handgun is, and if they tell me to turn it in, I’ve got a hard choice to make. I can’t support my family from behind bars. That’s reality.
March 17th, 2008 at 10:37 amRemember if they outlaw guns, only the police will have guns.
March 17th, 2008 at 10:58 amRemember if they outlaw guns, only the police and OUTLAWS will have guns.
Bet your life?
March 17th, 2008 at 12:22 pm