Girl Sues Airline For $200K Because “He, Like, Whacked Off Near Me”
FORT WORTH, Texas, March 15 — A 21-year-old Texas woman is suing American Airlines for allegedly not protecting her from a man who masturbated near her on a recent flight.
The woman, whose identity has not been released to the public, alleges airline employees did not act appropriately when a man sat next to her while she slept on a March 19 flight and began to masturbate, the Fort Worth (Texas) Star-Telegram said Saturday.
The woman's $200,000 lawsuit alleges that when she awoke on the flight to Los Angeles, she found the man masturbating and “a substantial amount of an extremely sticky substance in her hair.”
The woman reportedly was calmed by another passenger after making the discovery, while the man was taken into custody by police once the plane landed.
The suit alleges American Airlines employees informed police they had seen the man take the seat next to the woman, but did nothing to move him back to his assigned seat.
The Star-Telegram reported a spokesman for the airline said crew members took appropriate action.
(UPI)
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
Some gals just can’t take a compliment these days
March 16th, 2008 at 12:12 amYour comment is not funny..
March 16th, 2008 at 12:20 amIf you have a sick sense of humor it is. Hey, I resemble that remark.
March 16th, 2008 at 2:50 amHalf-mile high club?
March 16th, 2008 at 3:03 amken holton,
are you viewing a sexual obssessed man making a gentleman compliment ?
then your education must have been made with porn video
March 16th, 2008 at 3:20 am
Holton. would your mother be excited and happy if she woke up with a large amount of a sticky substance in her hair? How about your sister or maybe a daughter? 
March 16th, 2008 at 4:43 amHolton was joking!
I think.
Then again, we don’t know Holton now do we?
March 16th, 2008 at 5:52 amI think tazers are in order for this kind of behavior.
March 16th, 2008 at 10:11 amYour remark was politically incorrect, rude, socially unacceptable, and wrong.
It was friggin hilarious too.
March 16th, 2008 at 10:26 amI salute you sir.
Dont listen to them Holten, we’re not here to walk on eggshells, besides I think she’d trade a little man juice for $200k
March 16th, 2008 at 8:00 pmSorry for the non politicaly correct answer, I didn’t know I was in the sensitive new age guy section (my mistake).Remember when people could take a joke? nah, me neither.
March 16th, 2008 at 11:28 pmHow could this one have slipped by, “there’s something about Mary”.
March 17th, 2008 at 12:06 amThank god, someone else isn’t anal retentive cheers John
you’ve reminded me this isn’t the join hands and sing kum by yah code pink site
March 17th, 2008 at 1:01 am
Code pink are just downright ugly. No one would compliment them like that, Ken H 
April 25th, 2008 at 5:56 pmLet’s face facts. It is now not about justice, that would be to get the negligent airline employee/s disciplined and if necessary fired. This is now about money. This woman now sees the opportunity to make money off the airline and nothing else. What would the 200k be for? Psychotherapy? Come on!!!
And of course, Ken Holton’s joke was just that, a joke.
July 30th, 2008 at 3:18 am