-
-
blogroll
- A Soldier's Perspective
- Ace Of Spades
- American Soldier
- Ann Coulter
- Attack Machine
- Awesome Web Design
- Bill Ardolino
- Bill Roggio
- Black Five
- Blonde Sagacity
- Breitbart
- Chicagoray
- Confederate Yankee
- Day by Day Cartoon
- Euphoric Reality
- Flopping Aces
- Free Republic
- Frontier Web Design
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- Ian Schwartz
- Instapundit
- Jules Crittenden
- Little Green Footballs
- Matt Sanchez
- Michael Fumento
- Michael Yon
- Michelle Malkin
- Military.com
- Missiles And Stilletos
- Move America Forward
- Mudville Gazette
- Pass The Ammo
- Protest Warrior
- Roger L. Simon
- Sportsman's Outfit
- Stop The ACLU
- TCOverride
- The Belmont Club
- The Big God Blog
- The Crimson Blog
- The Daily Gut
- The Drudge Report
- The PoliTicking Timebomb
- The Pundit Review
- Veteran's Affairs Documentary
8 Responses
Respond now.
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
This is my first post on any web site, anytime, anywhere, on any subject. If SC rules incorrectly it doesn’t matter. The Imperial Federal Government of the States of America will never take my or my families guns period. They will have to shoot me and my whole family first.
Jeremy Crossman
March 18th, 2008 at 10:19 amSan Mateo, California
this shouldnt even be up for debate.
it is the people’s right to bear arms. having the ability to choose to buy a firearm is what America is about. the ability for an individual to choose.
and yes of course certain people should not be able to buy a firearm. like retards, criminals, and other people who have questionable backrounds.
lets say you have two children. one child is good, and the other is bad. Would you punish the good child for what the bad child did?
there isnt a single good reason to take firearms from law-abiding citizens.
Also, as much as i appreciate the police, its not always easy to get to a phone and then wait 10-15 minutes while your house is being robbed.
March 18th, 2008 at 10:48 amWe the People!
That is all that needs to be said!!
March 18th, 2008 at 11:00 amRead the Federalist papers No. 84 written by Alexander Hamilton. The U.S. Constitution has no authority to ban firearms, and the Bill of Rights is merely a redundant expression of rights implied by not giving such authority to the federal government. Even if the SC rules that the second amendment applies to militias only, the right to bear arms is not guaranteed only by the second amendment. The right to bear arms is an implied universal right because such control was not given to the U.S. government in the Constitution. Every authority the founders wanted the federal government to have is in the Constitution. Any authority not written in that document belongs to the people over which the federal government shall have no such control in that given matter.
March 18th, 2008 at 12:16 pmAgreed, what Mr. Heston said!
March 18th, 2008 at 1:15 pmYou and your family will have 200 million supporters with 180 million guns as alleys. We could actually clean out govt. LOLLOL
March 18th, 2008 at 1:44 pmIndividuals are the militia. There’s nothing to debate. Just read the text.
March 18th, 2008 at 7:14 pmThere could only be a debate about the Second ammendmant if one wanted to repeal it and/or was inclined to argue about what the meaning of “is” is.
Sigh…
Arthuraria is spot on,
March 18th, 2008 at 7:19 pmThe right to self defense is not a right granted by the government. The right to self defense is an inailienable, God given right which shall not be infringed.