Attorney-Client Privilege Keeps Innocent Man In Jail For 26 Years
Does Attorney-Client Privilege need some exceptions?
-
-
blogroll
- A Soldier's Perspective
- Ace Of Spades
- American Soldier
- Ann Coulter
- Attack Machine
- Bill Ardolino
- Bill Roggio
- Black Five
- Blonde Sagacity
- Breitbart
- Chicagoray
- Confederate Yankee
- Day by Day Cartoon
- Euphoric Reality
- Flopping Aces
- Free Republic
- Frontier Web Design
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- Ian Schwartz
- Instapundit
- Little Green Footballs
- Matt Sanchez
- Michael Fumento
- Michael Yon
- Michelle Malkin
- Military.com
- Missiles And Stilletos
- Move America Forward
- Mudville Gazette
- Pass The Ammo
- Protest Warrior
- Roger L. Simon
- Sportsman's Outfit
- Stop The ACLU
- TCOverride
- The Belmont Club
- The Big God Blog
- The Crimson Blog
- The Daily Gut
- The Drudge Report
- The PoliTicking Timebomb
- The Pundit Review
- Veteran's Affairs Documentary
-
5 Responses
Respond now.
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
WTF?
April 12th, 2008 at 1:10 pmLet the poor sob out. He got the screws big time, and I wonder how those attorney’s can sleep at night.
April 12th, 2008 at 2:17 pmThat’s messed up. Here’s the dilemma: the ETHICAL thing to do is to keep silent because if they talked, their word would no longer be trusted and they could no longer be lawyers. However, the MORAL thing to do was to give up the profession that they spent close to a decade and hundreds of thousands of dollars attaining, as well as the belief that they could do more from the inside as PDs than from the outside as disgraced ex-lawyers. It is a dilemma upon whose horns I pray I never find myself. Do I condemn them for not speaking? Yes, it was an immoral act. Do I understand WHY they didn’t speak up?
Unfortunately, all too well.
There are no winners in this situation, but the wrongly condemned was the biggest loser, and unfairly in my mind.
April 12th, 2008 at 2:41 pmGeez, if a person has difficulty choosing between ethical and moral decisions, I’d hate to be them on Judgement Day. Lawyers/liars; you can’t live without ‘em, but you can’t legally kill ‘em either. Talk about ethical vs. moral dilemmas!!
April 13th, 2008 at 6:41 amIf I had to do the time, I’d do the crime, and those lawyers would be the first two I’d lite up.
April 13th, 2008 at 6:59 am