Iraqi Army Snatches Victory From British

April 24th, 2008 Posted By drillanwr.

1

What a difference a month makes . . .

Times Online:

When Nouri al-Maliki launched his surprise attack against the main Shia militia in Basra, the operation appeared to be a disastrous miscalculation pitting inexperienced Iraqi soldiers against well-armed and battle-hardened street-fighters of the Mahdi Army.

Scores of soldiers defected from their ranks. Iraqi armoured vehicles were ambushed and destroyed by jubilant militiamen. An American general and several hundred US paratroopers had to race down to Iraq’s southern capital to rescue the operation with British forces offering air cover and logistical help.

The Iraqi Prime Minister, accused like his predecessor of indecision and a failure to tackle the pressing security problems facing his country, had taken personal control of the operation. It emerged that he ordered the assault weeks ahead of a more carefully planned offensive in conjunction with American and British advisers. Some predicted that the military blunder signalled the end of his unimpressive period in office.

One month on and Iraq’s leader can justifiably claim to have scored a stunning victory, probably the first of its kind by the post-Saddam Iraqi army. The most notorious areas of Basra are now under government control, the Mahdi Army of Moqtadr al-Sadr has been roundly defeated and the long suffering people of Basra are celebrating freedoms they did not enjoy during the four years of British military rule in the city.

So how did a military novice, using untested troops, succeed where thousands of British forces had failed?

The hint came at the weekend from the unlikely figure of Hassan Kazemi Qumi, the Iranian ambassador to Baghdad, whose country has in the past armed, funded and trained elements of the Mahdi Army.

“The idea of the government in Basra was to fight outlaws,” said the envoy. “This was the right of the government and the responsibility of the government. And in my opinion the government was able to achieve a positive result in Basra.” The Iranian embassy in Baghdad is not given to making any public statements, certainly not comments that support operations backed by the Great Satan, as America is called in Iran. But in the arcane world of Shia politics his comments made perfect sense.

While British forces were in Basra city, it was in Tehran’s interests to drive them out by backing various militias that would help consolidate Iran’s control over Iraq’s second city, the country’s only access to the sea and a region containing its largest oil reserves.

But once the British withdrew from the city centre to Basra airport last summer, the situation changed. Suddenly it was Moqtadr al-Sadr and his rag-tag fighters who were the dominant force in the Basra region. The Iranian backed Badr Organisation, which is well represented in Iraq’s police and military, was sidelined. There were real fears that the Sadrists could consolidate their gains on the ground in local elections planned for October and eclipse the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, Badr’s political wing.

For once the interests of America, Britain, Iran and the Iraqi government coincided with disastrous results for Mr al-Sadr and his fighters. Isolated and abandoned they fled, were captured or killed from what were once their impregnable fiefdoms in Basra. Mr al-Sadr was left to lick his wounds and complain that the Government had forgotten that they were all “brothers”.

The victory demonstrated what can happen in even the most lawless regions of Iraq when the main external forces, in this case America and Iran, act with common purpose.

Unfortunately, there is little evidence that the Basra example will be repeated any time soon. In Baghdad, US forces are currently engaged in an identical battle against Mahdi Army irregulars concentrated in their Sadr City stronghold. In response to US air strikes, the militia is firing Iranian-made rockets and mortars into the Green Zone, the heavily fortified area containing the US and British embassies.

The combatants may be the same as those fighting in Basra, but the political circumstances are completely different. In Baghdad it seems Iran wants the Mahdi Army to continue to have a piece of the Iraqi capital and a stake in the politics of the city.

The Iranian ambassador condemned America’s use of force in Baghdad and gave warning that it would lead to further bloodshed and more destruction. For now at least, his predictions have come true.


    • Young Americans Documentary
    • Learn More About Pat
    • blogroll

      • A Soldier's Perspective
      • Ace Of Spades
      • American Soldier
      • Ann Coulter
      • Attack Machine
      • Bill Ardolino
      • Bill Roggio
      • Black Five
      • Blonde Sagacity
      • Breitbart
      • Chicagoray
      • Confederate Yankee
      • Day by Day Cartoon
      • Euphoric Reality
      • Flopping Aces
      • Free Republic
      • Frontier Web Design
      • Hot Air
      • Hugh Hewitt
      • Ian Schwartz
      • Instapundit
      • Jules Crittenden
      • Little Green Footballs
      • Matt Sanchez
      • Michael Fumento
      • Michael Yon
      • Michelle Malkin
      • Military.com
      • Missiles And Stilletos
      • Move America Forward
      • Mudville Gazette
      • Pass The Ammo
      • Protest Warrior
      • Roger L. Simon
      • Sportsman's Outfit
      • Stop The ACLU
      • TCOverride
      • The Belmont Club
      • The Big God Blog
      • The Crimson Blog
      • The Daily Gut
      • The Drudge Report
      • The PoliTicking Timebomb
      • The Pundit Review
      • Veteran's Affairs Documentary

11 Responses

  1. Dan (The Infidel)

    “One month on and Iraq’s leader can justifiably claim to have scored a stunning victory, probably the first of its kind by the post-Saddam Iraqi army. The most notorious areas of Basra are now under government control, the Mahdi Army of Moqtadr al-Sadr has been roundly defeated and the long suffering people of Basra are celebrating freedoms they did not enjoy during the four years of British military rule in the city. ”

    OMG and this was from the Times? Wow. :mrgreen:

  2. GF

    Mmm, I think the Times Online has got it wrong about Iran being the puppet master here.

  3. RTLM

    For once the interests of America, Britain, Iran and the Iraqi government coincided with disastrous results for Mr al-Sadr and his fighters. Isolated and abandoned they fled, were captured or killed from what were once their impregnable fiefdoms in Basra. Mr al-Sadr was left to lick his wounds and complain that the Government had forgotten that they were all “brothers”.

    Nothing motivates like success.
    :beer: :gun:

  4. Leatherneck

    The Iraqi in the above pic looks like he actually gives a shit.

    Something about the gleam in his eye….

  5. RTLM

    Nothing motivates like success.
    :beer: :gun:

  6. mike3481

    :arrow: GF, After the Brits withdrew last Summer, the majority of Mookie’s so called Army descended into criminal gangs, they pursued criminal activities and NOT Mookie’s agenda!

    When they came face to face with an American trained Iraqi Army, they got their asses kicked to say the least!

    If you believe Iran’s Quds Force isn’t pulling Mookie’s chain…we’ll…I’ll be kind, and say, you’re sorely mistaken…

    …spend more time at patdollard.com and Strategypage.com

    Reality will set you free!

  7. Q_Mech

    :arrow: Leatherneck - you know what? That guy looks downright American.

    :smile:

  8. ticticboom(Will Kill For Oil)

    This action did a lot to trim the dead wood. All those deserters are now out of the system. The rat’s nest of Sadr city is being cleared out, over the howls of Iran and Mookie. More and more Iranian arms shipments are being intercepted. The people have decided that the Americans and Iraqi government are the strong horse, and the Iranians and Mookie the weak one. Even the Leftist media has admitted that we’re winning.

    The tide has turned, and failing an escalation by Iran, Iraq will soon be a fully funtioning, secure nation. Soon, Iraq will even be immune from the defeatocrats stabbing them in the back like they did South Vietnam. Between their oil wealth, and there being no superpower arming their enemies, they’ll be able to hold their own against any comers.

    History will judge Bush kindly, I think.

  9. TerryTate

    :arrow: mike 3481

    GF, After the Brits withdrew last Summer, the majority of Mookie’s so called Army descended into criminal gangs, they pursued criminal activities and NOT Mookie’s agenda!

    When they came face to face with an American trained Iraqi Army, they got their asses kicked to say the least!

    If you believe Iran’s Quds Force isn’t pulling Mookie’s chain…we’ll…I’ll be kind, and say, you’re sorely mistaken…

    …spend more time at patdollard.com and Strategypage.com

    Reality will set you free!
    ————————————————————

    I think you need to pay attention to what you read more closely. The article is implying that Iran was only in bed with the Badr (shiite-group 1) organization, and that Iran had a common interest with the U.S./Iraq in getting rid of Mookies band, the Sadrists (shiite-group 2). The problem with that theory is that Mookie has been backed by Iran for, oh I don’t know, since before the war.

    The article is trying to imply that Iran has been pulling the strings to get rid of Mookie when that goes completely against there own goals which was to control Basra. Why would Iran want to get rid of their puppet (Mookie) who was in control of Basra, and hand it over to the Iraqi government?

    This article is an attempt by Iran (through the Iranian Ambassador to Iraq) to save face for having their puppet (Mookie) get his ass handed to him. Iran lost, and they should get used to it, as more is coming. Everyone who knows that Mookie was Irans boy isn’t going to believe this spin story when they claim that he is their enemy. Mookie has been freakin living in Iran under the shelter of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard protection for cripes sake.

    GF was right, the Times article got it wrong-Iran is not the puppetmaster here. The U.S. is the puppetmaster.

  10. TedB

    The Times, once again, wants to fill their mouths with Iranian cock…

  11. JewishOdysseus

    “When Nouri al-Maliki launched his surprise attack against the main Shia militia in Basra, the operation appeared to be a disastrous miscalculation pitting inexperienced Iraqi soldiers against well-armed and battle-hardened street-fighters of the Mahdi Army.

    Scores of soldiers defected from their ranks. Iraqi armoured vehicles were ambushed and destroyed by jubilant militiamen. An American general and several hundred US paratroopers had to race down to Iraq’s southern capital to rescue the operation with British forces offering air cover and logistical help.

    The Iraqi Prime Minister, accused like his predecessor of indecision and a failure to tackle the pressing security problems facing his country, had taken personal control of the operation. It emerged that he ordered the assault weeks ahead of a more carefully planned offensive in conjunction with American and British advisers. Some predicted that the military blunder signalled the end of his unimpressive period in office.

    One month on and Iraq’s leader can justifiably claim to have scored a stunning victory, probably the first of its kind by the post-Saddam Iraqi army. The most notorious areas of Basra are now under government control, the Mahdi Army of Moqtadr al-Sadr has been roundly defeated and the long suffering people of Basra are celebrating freedoms they did not enjoy during the four years of British military rule in the city.”

    Well, NOT EVERYONE was shocked and stunned by the events on the ground…Some of us saw it as part of [gasp]…a well-thought-out PLAN:

    https://pat-dollard.com/2008/03/updateal-sadr-pulls-fighters-off-streets/

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen::neutral::twisted::arrow::shock::smile::???::cool::evil::grin::idea::oops::razz::roll::wink::cry::eek::lol::mad::sad::!::?::beer::beer: