Petraeus Gives High Marks to Maliki’s Anti-Militia Offensive
Iraqi Special Forces
By Gerry J. Gilmore
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, April 10, 2008 - Iraqi security forces acquitted themselves well, in view of their relative inexperience, in recent fighting against terrorists and criminals in the southern part of the country, including Basra, as well as in parts of Baghdad, the top U.S. military officer in Iraq said here today.
“The deployment was very impressive, … certainly not something Iraqis could have done a year ago,” Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander of Multinational Force Iraq, said during a conference call with military analysts.
At the end of March, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki ordered the rapid deployment of thousands of Iraqi security forces to Basra to confront illegal militias and criminal elements said to be operating there. The deployment touched off a spike of violence in that city that spread to Najaf, Karbala and southern Baghdad.
The Iraqi forces “did quite well” overall, Petraeus pointed out, although some were reported reluctant to participate. Incomplete Iraqi planning and coordination for the operation likely contributed to this, he said, noting some inexperienced infantry leaders were reported to have made hasty, ill-advised decisions while immersed in the fury of combat.
The “conditions [of battle] were not set, arguably, the way that they should have been before having dismounted infantry engage with the enemy,” Petraeus explained. “That is hugely important.”
The operations also highlighted the need to improve coordination and communications between Iraqi ground forces and their coalition air-to-ground support elements, the four-star general observed.
Still, the majority of Iraqi security forces — especially the special operations units — performed well in fighting against insurgents in Basra and other areas of the country, Petraeus emphasized.
The Iraqi forces performed visibly better “once there was a deliberate approach, if you will, where the conditions were set for each subsequent move,” Petraeus said.
“I’m not sure I would have predicted that they could deploy as substantial a force as they did, as rapidly as they did — at all,” Petraeus said. On the other hand, he conceded, there are clearly areas — including command-and-control systems — that require improvement.
During his testimony yesterday before the House Armed Services Committee, Petraeus noted that Maliki’s decision to send Iraqi troops into Basra and other parts of Iraq to put down violence perpetrated by illegal militias represents Iraqis’ desire to attend to their internal affairs.
“That was not something that we pushed him to do,” Petraeus told the committee. “That was something that they wanted to do.”
Meanwhile, anti-insurgent operations in Basra continue, Petraeus reported, noting Iraqi security forces now have control of the city of Um Qasr, the country’s main port. Um Qasr is a major conduit for the smuggling of weapons and contraband into Iraq, the general said.
“The operation is still very much an ongoing affair, and it will be, frankly, for months,” Petraeus told the analysts.
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
This is exactly the type of shakedown they need. Besides the morale boost of a solid victory, active combat is showing everyone exactly what needs to be improved and where. Every time JAM or other rogue militias engage them, they’re going to have that much more experience to draw upon.
April 10th, 2008 at 2:00 pmThose Iraqi spec ops look like some bad asses dont they?
And yeah throwing them into the fire is the only way to know their degree of readiness. seems like they are coming along nicely. then again they are being trained by the best
April 10th, 2008 at 2:32 pmThey out performed the Brits in Basra.
April 10th, 2008 at 6:36 pmWTF is wrong with the England? Turned pussy?
well SAS still kicks ass, as well as other elite groups, i think the main reason for poor British performance is because of politicians that ran away from the fight, cause i wouldn’t doubt the Brits capacity to fight, Maliki was just “disappointed” with politics, thats all…if you remember about 2 years ago Brits transfered some of the bases in Basra to Iraqi army, but the Iraq forces were not ready to take over the positions in time, so the Brits left the bases, empty, didn’t even wait for the Iraq army to step in…thats poor judgment on part of politicians to kiss ass with the electorate and now we all can see what that decision has led to…in a way it played out well cause Iraq forces did get some experience in the wide-scale combat operations, and the traitors among the ranks of Iraq army have been exposed, before they did more damage than they already have…good work
April 11th, 2008 at 12:39 am