The Accidental Rebel

April 23rd, 2008 Posted By drillanwr.

Late last night I was discussing online with my college daughter Kate the Pa. results … And trying to explain to her the monstrous disaster the 1968 Democrat Convention turned into in Chicago … Trying to relate to her the “social turmoil” our country was in, and some of the instigators fueling the mess of that time.

I found this today, and although a liberal commentator, I think it gives a little piece of a thumbnail about the mentality that existed at that time.

I, for one, am pondering if we will see a repeat this Democrat Convention.

The Party is split between “Our socialist is better than your socialist, and he’s prettier too!”

Not to forget the massively funded, Communist-backed professional protest groups (see: Code Pink, and the like) that have probably been “training” for this for months … and NOW have the 24/7 cable news outlets to perform for.

Should we see a repeat of the `68 Dem Convention riots, I am wondering if not a few or more conservative leaning “democrat” voters (see: my dear old Pop) might not beg off the straight-line party vote and either stay home in November … or give John McCain their vote.

Might be in for a HOT summer, in more ways than one.

Guess we shall see.

null

NYTimes:

IT was the year of years, the year of craziness, the year of fire, blood and death. I had just turned 21, and I was as crazy as everyone else.

There were half a million American soldiers in Vietnam, Martin Luther King had just been assassinated, cities were burning across America, and the world seemed headed for an apocalyptic breakdown.

Being crazy struck me as a perfectly sane response to the hand I had been dealt — the hand that all young men had been dealt in 1968. The instant I graduated from college, I would be drafted to fight in a war I despised to the depths of my being, and because I had already made up my mind to refuse to fight in that war, I knew that my future held only two options: prison or exile.

I was not a violent person. Looking back on those days now, I see myself as a quiet, bookish young man, struggling to teach myself how to become a writer, immersed in my courses in literature and philosophy at Columbia. I had marched in demonstrations against the war, but I was not an active member of any political organization on campus. I felt sympathetic to the aims of S.D.S. (one of several radical student groups, but by no means the most radical), and yet I never attended its meetings and not once had I handed out a broadside or leaflet. I wanted to read my books, write my poems and drink with my friends at the West End bar.

Forty years ago today, a protest rally was held on the Columbia campus. The issue had nothing to do with the war, but rather a gymnasium the university was about to build in Morningside Park. The park was public property, and because Columbia intended to create a separate entrance for the local residents (mostly black), the building plan was deemed to be both unjust and racist. I was in accord with this assessment, but I didn’t attend the rally because of the gym.

I went because I was crazy, crazy with the poison of Vietnam in my lungs, and the many hundreds of students who gathered around the sundial in the center of campus that afternoon were not there to protest the construction of the gym so much as to vent their craziness, to lash out at something, anything, and since we were all students at Columbia, why not throw bricks at Columbia, since it was engaged in lucrative research projects for military contractors and thus was contributing to the war effort in Vietnam?

Speech followed tempestuous speech, the enraged crowd roared with approval, and then someone suggested that we all go to the construction site and tear down the chain-link fence that had been erected to keep out trespassers. The crowd thought that was an excellent idea, and so off it went, a throng of crazy, shouting students charging off the Columbia campus toward Morningside Park. Much to my astonishment, I was with them. What had happened to the gentle boy who planned to spend the rest of his life sitting alone in a room writing books? He was helping to tear down the fence. He tugged and pulled and pushed along with several dozen others and, truth be told, found much satisfaction in this crazy, destructive act.

After the outburst in the park, campus buildings were stormed, occupied and held for a week. I wound up in Mathematics Hall and stayed for the duration of the sit-in. The students of Columbia were on strike. As we calmly held our meetings indoors, the campus was roiling with belligerent shouting matches and slugfests as those for and against the strike went at one another with abandon. By the night of April 30, the Columbia administration had had enough, and the police were called in. A bloody riot ensued. Along with more than 700 other people, I was arrested — pulled by my hair to the police van by one officer as another officer stomped on my hand with his boot. But no regrets. I was proud to have done my bit for the cause. Both crazy and proud.

What did we accomplish? Not much of anything. It’s true that the gymnasium project was scrapped, but the real issue was Vietnam, and the war dragged on for seven more horrible years. You can’t change government policy by attacking a private institution. When French students erupted in May of that year of years, they were directly confronting the national government — because their universities were public, under the control of the Ministry of Education, and what they did initiated changes in French life. We at Columbia were powerless, and our little revolution was no more than a symbolic gesture. But symbolic gestures are not empty gestures, and given the nature of those times, we did what we could.

I hesitate to draw any comparisons with the present — and therefore will not end this memory-piece with the word “Iraq.” I am 61 now, but my thinking has not changed much since that year of fire and blood, and as I sit alone in this room with a pen in my hand, I realize that I am still crazy, perhaps crazier than ever.

Paul Auster is the author of the forthcoming “Man in the Dark.”


    • Young Americans Documentary
    • Learn More About Pat
    • blogroll

      • A Soldier's Perspective
      • Ace Of Spades
      • American Soldier
      • Ann Coulter
      • Attack Machine
      • Bill Ardolino
      • Bill Roggio
      • Black Five
      • Blonde Sagacity
      • Breitbart
      • Chicagoray
      • Confederate Yankee
      • Day by Day Cartoon
      • Euphoric Reality
      • Flopping Aces
      • Free Republic
      • Frontier Web Design
      • Hot Air
      • Hugh Hewitt
      • Ian Schwartz
      • Instapundit
      • Jules Crittenden
      • Little Green Footballs
      • Matt Sanchez
      • Michael Fumento
      • Michael Yon
      • Michelle Malkin
      • Military.com
      • Missiles And Stilletos
      • Move America Forward
      • Mudville Gazette
      • Pass The Ammo
      • Protest Warrior
      • Roger L. Simon
      • Sportsman's Outfit
      • Stop The ACLU
      • TCOverride
      • The Belmont Club
      • The Big God Blog
      • The Crimson Blog
      • The Daily Gut
      • The Drudge Report
      • The PoliTicking Timebomb
      • The Pundit Review
      • Veteran's Affairs Documentary

9 Responses

  1. el Vaquero

    Go to the NYTimes article and read the post replies…it is a collective amen from the now 60 year old middleclass ex-hippies that live and breath their idiot days @ Columbia and still think they were standing up for some great revolution…it’s a triple barf read. A shameful collection of hate America fools…

  2. TedB

    What meaningless pap. Okay, so you have admitted that you really didn’t have a point beyond being “revolutionary”?

    Well, I guess you have eleven steps to go. Good luck with that.

  3. TerryTate

    :arrow: Paul Auster

    I am 61 now, but my thinking has not changed much since that year of fire and blood, and as I sit alone in this room with a pen in my hand,I realize that I am still crazy, perhaps crazier than ever.

    —————————————————————-

    Yep, Paul you are crazy. A crazy, stupid pussy. Thanks for wasting what America has offered to you.

    :roll:

  4. drillanwr (hembra blanca típica)

    The 60s left overs (such as Paul Auster) are hoping, if not coordinating, the street theater we see today.

    It’s really meaningless … Even LESS than it was in the 1960s.

    They have no real “beef” … Much like the lame excuses for antiwar, antiBush “protest” songs you hear/see [artists] churning out on their falling-sales CDs.

    It’s become more of a fad thing to do (like carrying around imported bottles of water or wearing meaningless ribbons or plastic bracelets) for attention. “Look at me! Look at me! I hate Bush and America too …!”

  5. serfer62

    There will only be riots if Barry isn’t selected…after all he deserves it, he’s black.

    But his selection, well, what the hell, if either is selected the Kommies go down in flames.

    Big question, will they win seats in house & senate?

  6. Boo Boo

    Vaquero, I looked at the comments…I felt my breakfast coming up. Before the internet, I didn’t know what pukes walked the earth…I didn’t get to see their innermost thoughts that they like to post on NYT comment sites. Now, I wish I didn’t know. It’s like a nightmare from which I cannot awake. :roll:

  7. CathyH

    :arrow: FTA

    When French students erupted in May of that year of years, they were directly confronting the national government — because their universities were public, under the control of the Ministry of Education, and what they did initiated changes in French life.

    ——————————————————–

    He says life changed in France as if it was a good thing :roll: The French people finally wised up when they had the chance to elect Sarkozy.

  8. ticticboom(Will Kill For Oil)

    Reading this, I noticed something common among lefties. There’s a lot of emotion there, but there’s little, if any, thinking. Much of what drives these creatures is from the cognitive dissonance they created when they abandoned thinking and embraced unreason.

    Instead of worrying about the people who want them dead, they rage against the people who point out that the world isn’t full of sweetness and light. They have an almost complete lack of self-awareness, and can’t tell the difference between friend or foe. Look at Carter, shaking hands with people who’d gleefully saw his head off.

  9. drillanwr (hembra blanca típica)

    :arrow: ticticboom(Will Kill For Oil)

    Reading this, I noticed something common among lefties. There’s a lot of emotion there, but there’s little, if any, thinking. Much of what drives these creatures is from the cognitive dissonance they created when they abandoned thinking and embraced unreason.

    ———————————————————-

    :!: Hence, in a nut shell (PUN intended), his last sentence:

    “I am 61 now, but my thinking has not changed much since that year of fire and blood, and as I sit alone in this room with a pen in my hand, I realize that I am still crazy, perhaps crazier than ever.”

    :!: Liberalism IS a disease … a mental and emotional one … and one of addiction … to unreason and stupidity.

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen::neutral::twisted::arrow::shock::smile::???::cool::evil::grin::idea::oops::razz::roll::wink::cry::eek::lol::mad::sad::!::?::beer::beer: