Truth Breaks Out In Iraq On Iran
From Voices Of Iraq:
Baghdad, Apr 26, (VOI) – The New York Times said on Saturday that the United States of America “has gathered its most detailed evidence so far of Iranian involvement in training and arming fighters in Iraq,” and it mentioned that the Iraqi government currently “confronts Iran diplomatically with new evidence of Iranian assistance to Shiite militias.”
“The United States has gathered its most detailed evidence so far of Iranian involvement in training and arming fighters in Iraq, officials say, but significant uncertainties remain about the extent of that involvement and the threat it poses to American and Iraqi forces,” the daily said.
“Publication of the dossier — which includes pages of charts and photographs of seized Iranian-made weapons — has been widely expected but has now been delayed while the government of Iraq’s prime minister, Nouri Kamal al-Maliki, confronts Iran diplomatically with new evidence of Iranian assistance to Shiite militias, one of the officials said,” it added.
“Some intelligence and administration officials said Iran seemed to have carefully calibrated its involvement in Iraq over the last year, in contrast to what President Bush and other American officials have publicly portrayed as an intensified Iranian role,” it explained.
“It remains difficult to draw firm conclusions about the ebb and flow of Iranian arms into Iraq, and the Bush administration has not produced its most recent evidence,” The New York Times asserted.
“But interviews with more than two dozen military, intelligence and administration officials showed that while shipments of arms had continued in recent months despite an official Iranian pledge to stop the weapons flow, they had not necessarily increased,” it said.
“Iran, the officials said, has shifted tactics to distance itself from a direct role in Iraq since the American military captured 20 Iranian operatives inside Iraq in December 2006 and January 2007. Ten of those Iranians remain in American custody,” the daily proceeded.
“Since then, Iran seems to have focused instead on training Iraqi Shiite fighters inside Iran, though the exact number remains unclear. Some officials said only handfuls of fighters at a time had recently trained in Iran. At the same time, Iran has sought to retain political and economic influence over a variety of Shiite factions, not just the most extremist militias, known as “special groups,” it clarified.
In an interview with The New York Times, a senior official familiar with the intelligence about Iran said “they don’t want to be identified with activities that might be seen by the international community as illegitimate.”
Officials told the daily “Iran has sought to spread its influence inside Iraq not only by its support to militias, but also through legitimate economic assistance, in particular across the oil-rich Shiite south.”
“The Iranians also support a number of Shiite parties and militias — including providing weapons to militias fighting the Shiite-led government in Baghdad as well as to militias supporting that government,” it said.
“For weeks, Mr. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and the top American officials in Iraq have portrayed Iran as a significant and growing threat to the American war effort in Iraq. In particular, they have cited an intensified barrage of Iranian-made rockets hitting the Green Zone in Baghdad — including attacks during a visit by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice — that have killed Americans and Iraqis,” it added.
“None of the officials interviewed disputed the notion that Iran sought to undermine American interests in Iraq, but in recent weeks the administration has sought to emphasize the threat by citing new evidence,” it reported.
“The interrogations of four Iraqi Shiite militia commanders, for example, have provided new details about the extent of training conducted by the Quds Force of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, officials said,” The New York Times explained.
“Still, the officials offered an assessment of Iranian involvement that was more complicated and nuanced than public statements by Mr. Bush and other officials, including Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, who said at a news conference this week that ‘what Iranians are doing is killing American servicemen inside Iraq’ by providing training and weapons to Shiite fighters,” it clarified.
“At the White House, the Pentagon, the intelligence agencies and the military headquarters in Baghdad, officials declined to detail publicly the extent of Iran’s support for fighters in Iraq, referring instead only in broad terms to training, equipping and financing Shiite militias,” it mentioned.
But in the wake of his briefings to Congress on April 8 and 9, according to The New York Times, “Gen. David H. Petraeus, the senior commander, ordered his subordinates to prepare a public dossier on Iranian involvement as part of the administration’s efforts to expose Iran’s covert activities and sustain support for the war, which is increasingly unpopular at home.”
The daily highlighted that on Capitol Hill, General Petraeus said Iranian-backed militias could “pose the greatest long-term threat to the viability of a democratic Iraq.”
MH/SR
No Shit!NYT finally gets it?
April 26th, 2008 at 9:21 pmA nuanced report by the Times? Hmmm… Everything about the Times is nuanced.
The evidence against Iran is growing by the day. I still think GW is building the political case for war against Iran for the next Administration. It’s already a slam-dunk in my view.
Let’s see if Mccain’s singing voice is up to a few more choruses of Bomb, Bomb Iran.
April 26th, 2008 at 10:38 pmAPPARENTLY “PINCH” SULZBERGER IS ACTUALLY NOT TRYING TO DESTROY THE NEW YORK TIMES.
April 26th, 2008 at 11:18 pmWhy the fuck do they keep saying “more nuanced?” More nuanced my ass, it all comes down the same in the end. Iran has been, and is still, killing my brothers. Fuck em. Fuck em good.
April 26th, 2008 at 11:56 pm“…but significant uncertainties remain about the extent of that involvement and the threat it poses…”
Isn’t it amazing how easily the NY Times will beleive Saddam wasn’t a threat to his neighbors yet has the most difficult time beleiving Iran is a threat to their neighbors? Agenda driven?
Dubya’s fault in 5,4,3,2…
April 27th, 2008 at 6:59 am