Watergate Judiciary Chief Fired Hillary For Lying & Unethical Behavior
Only three people, during the 17 years that this guy served, never received letters of recommendation from him. Hillary was one of them. He said she was fired for lying and unethical behavior. And we aren’t talking some ditzy college co-ed here…she was 27.
Dan Calabrese from the North Star Writer’s Group has the story…
As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.
The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.
Why?
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
Read the full article at North Star Writer’s Group by Dan Calabrese here.
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
Someone should ask her if she was fired from the Judiciary Cmtee and if she got a letter of recommendation. It’s a valid question.
April 1st, 2008 at 6:13 pmThis is no surprise.
And this revelation will make no difference with the hard-core Hillary supporters.
Those who champion this vaginally-challenged bipedal shadow-human abomination are as fucked up as she is.
How have we come so far only to come up so short?
April 1st, 2008 at 6:19 pmOuch … *that’s* gonna leave a mark!
April 1st, 2008 at 6:19 pmPer Robert Novak ” she a congenital liar ”
In other words it’s in her genes and just can’t help herself, no wonder her and Bubba get along so well!!
Ha Ha Ha !!!
This and Rip Van Obama are the best the dems can put up in 08! As pathetic as McCain is he should blow either one of them out of the race, G-d I hope he doesn’t screw this up.
April 1st, 2008 at 6:22 pmFired for lying and unethical behavior. I wonder if anyone will bring this issue up in the campaign…like the questions on Lewinsky? Not that we already don’t know that she-who-rides-a-broom is also a bold-faced lying socialist or anything? It’s just nice to hear more people say it and can prove it. Stick a fork in the bitch…she’s done.
April 1st, 2008 at 6:36 pmReady to be a KUNT on day one.
April 1st, 2008 at 6:49 pmWell at least she has a history of experience doing something.
Too bad Burke Marshall couldn’t give her a good reference, I guess that’s because she’s such a lousy liar.
April 1st, 2008 at 7:06 pmKA-BOOM!
April 1st, 2008 at 7:27 pmDems’ choices for nomination: Mega-liar 1, or Mega-liar 2. Hmmmmmm ….
It’s a sad commentary about our nation that a person such as Billery can rise to the power that she has enjoyed.
April 1st, 2008 at 8:02 pmWe deserve better opposition than this.
It’s not just that she’s a liar. It’s that she’s such an artless, DUMB liar. This is a case when the wildly over-used term “pathological liar” is entirely apt. The lie reported in the article is evidence of mental functioning on the order of that of a child who believes she is hiding — that people can’t see her — when she holds her hands over her eyes. That is, did she really think no one in Washington would remember the precedent setting impeachment proceedings of a SUPREME freakin’ COURT JUSTICE??!! If she but hid the papers? Rose law firm billing records anyone? Vince Foster’s papers?
This is a fatal functional deficit that is clearly not just ongoing, but rampant. She should not, can not be President. She would precipitate a crisis of State necessitating her immediate, Constitutional removal for incapacitation in less than a year.
April 1st, 2008 at 8:05 pmTo be fired by a democrat nutjob, who fantasizes an interview with Eleanor Roosevelt in a dream in which she endorses Barack “Insane” Obama, is pretty damning.
http://www.jzeifman.com/
April 1st, 2008 at 8:21 pmThanks for that link, Gary. There I found this:
It was not until two months after Nixon’s resignation that I first learned of still another
questionable role of Hillary. On Sept. 26, 1974, Rep. Charles Wiggins, a
Republican member of the committee, wrote to ask Chairman Rodino to look into “a
troubling set of events.” That spring, Wiggins and other committee members had
asked “that research should be undertaken so as to furnish a standard against
which to test the alleged abusive conduct of Richard Nixon.” And, while “no such
staff study was made available to the members at any time for their use,” Wiggins
had just learned that such a study had been conducted - at committee expense - by
a team of professors who completed and filed their reports with the impeachment-
inquiry staff well in advance of our public
hearings.
The report was kept secret from members of Congress. But after the impeachment-
inquiry staff was disbanded, it was published commercially and sold in book stores.
Wiggins wrote: “I am especially troubled by the possibility that information deemed
essential by some of the members in their discharge of their responsibilities may
have been intentionally suppressed by the staff during the course our investigation.”
He was also concerned that staff members may have unlawfully received royalties
from the book’s publisher.
On Oct. 3, Rodino wrote back: “Hillary Rodham of the impeachment-inquiry staff
April 1st, 2008 at 9:11 pmcoordinated the work. The staff did not think the manuscript was useful in its present
form.” No effort was ever made to ascertain whether or not Hillary or any other
person on the committee staff received royalties.
The trail of destruction starts early and goes deep in the Clinton family. Just another Leftest day in the life of the most corrupt political family in American history.
April 2nd, 2008 at 3:52 amLet’s just keep all of this under our hats until Hilly wins the nomination…
April 2nd, 2008 at 3:54 amjohn mccain, the only real american…the others are phonies
April 2nd, 2008 at 3:56 am“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
isn’t this the purpose of a dumacrcat?
April 2nd, 2008 at 4:04 amThe Zeifman article was published in 1999, before Mrs. Clinton’s first Senate run. It the media cared about the Clintons’ honesty, or utter lack thereof, the story would been news then. It wasn’t.
April 2nd, 2008 at 5:08 amThat’s shameful. I mean, other stuff she does is shameful, but for someone to be so blunt about it… It makes me sick to think that she might be President if we don’t get these facts to light.
April 2nd, 2008 at 5:13 amseriously as super sociopathic lying evil bastard and hellery is even lower!
April 2nd, 2008 at 6:21 amLike seeks like.. Seems that Bubba himself was disbarred from the Arkansas BAR Association. Just another piece of human trash.
April 2nd, 2008 at 6:38 amI guess I’m getting too thick-skinned. Crap like this doesn’t even suprise me anymore.
April 2nd, 2008 at 7:22 amAs I read the article I was amazed that a Dem was actually upset that a fellow Dem was lying. Thirty-some years later a typical Dem in Zeifman’s position would give the three liars a commendation and pass on all the rest.
And today’s Dems call themselves Progressive? Hardly…
John McCain. He might fuck up from time to time - hell, who don’t? But fuck up, large or small he may be, he’s still the only AMERICAN fuck up we got.
and - “vaginally-challenged bipedal shadow-human abomination”
April 2nd, 2008 at 7:29 amLord Jesus,Denghis, that’s a winner!
At least when all this is over she can still have a career with the ACLU, they don’t give a shit. Matter of fact, the more you lie and the more dishonest you are, the farther up the ladder you go.
April 2nd, 2008 at 9:37 amSomeone should ask her if she was fired from the Judiciary Cmtee and if she got a letter of recommendation. It’s a valid question.
———————————————————-
I’m with you on that … But let’s not hold our breath. The MSM HAS chosen B-HO, but they still might not completely lob off her big head … It could mean theirs.
April 2nd, 2008 at 1:56 pm