Woman Finds Naked Painting Of Herself For Sale At Nearly $35M

April 20th, 2008 Posted By Pat Dollard.

    • Young Americans Documentary
    • Learn More About Pat
    • blogroll

      • A Soldier's Perspective
      • Ace Of Spades
      • American Soldier
      • Ann Coulter
      • Attack Machine
      • Bill Ardolino
      • Bill Roggio
      • Black Five
      • Blonde Sagacity
      • Breitbart
      • Chicagoray
      • Confederate Yankee
      • Day by Day Cartoon
      • Euphoric Reality
      • Flopping Aces
      • Free Republic
      • Frontier Web Design
      • Hot Air
      • Hugh Hewitt
      • Ian Schwartz
      • Instapundit
      • Jules Crittenden
      • Little Green Footballs
      • Matt Sanchez
      • Michael Fumento
      • Michael Yon
      • Michelle Malkin
      • Military.com
      • Missiles And Stilletos
      • Move America Forward
      • Mudville Gazette
      • Pass The Ammo
      • Protest Warrior
      • Roger L. Simon
      • Sportsman's Outfit
      • Stop The ACLU
      • TCOverride
      • The Belmont Club
      • The Big God Blog
      • The Crimson Blog
      • The Daily Gut
      • The Drudge Report
      • The PoliTicking Timebomb
      • The Pundit Review
      • Veteran's Affairs Documentary

14 Responses

  1. Snooper

    :shock: :?: :gun: :beer: :shock:

  2. mike3481

    35 million?…She’s proud?…it’s actually hanging on a wall in view of the public?

    I…I…I have no words. :shock:

    PS - Pat thanks for the deceptive thumbnail pics on the front page for this video and the snake vid. Yes, I’d be laughing too.

  3. One Shot

    Big deal.

    They have a picture of her on the cover of Moby Dick too…

    .

  4. Egfrow

    Modern art is the art of bullshit.

  5. TerryTate

    Is that price by the pound or the total cost of the painting?

    :lol:

  6. cb10

    The $35 mil painting comes with a dozen big ass nails to hang it.

  7. hegelbot

    :arrow: egfrow while i agree that a lot of modern art is crap Lucian Freud is pretty amazing, the painting in question took a lot of skill. And though you may not care for the subject matter at least its not a lot of Jackson Pollock paint splashes or Kandinsky clap trap.

  8. deathstar

    You bastards, I clicked on the link to see a bigger picture of the nice lady on the main page. Wow, that painting harshed my buzz.

  9. dtodeen

    Thats Gross…. Ugly tits and all :gun: :gun: :gun:

  10. Kurt(the infidel)

    sheesh. this was definitely false advertising :lol:

    Pats probably laughing his ass off at us right now. you thought it was going to be the hot ass blonde on the thumbnail pic, but it was just a fatty

  11. NickD

    When I was in art school, a lot of my fellow students were big fans of Lucian Freud - he is definitely an artist of great skill, but his work never appealed to me that much. I’ve always thought his figures seemed cadaverous and his color palette seems sickly. Could be that’s part of his intent to shock but I’ve never been interested enough in his work to find out more.

    :arrow: agree with hegelbot too - most modern art is crap, using lazy techniques that are given academic and critical weight with florid explanations and attempts to add some sort of social context, usually not very well.

  12. BT

    :shock: I’m blind :shock:

  13. Reagan T.

    I was DECEIVED

  14. Pat Dollard

    That was a picture of her at 19. The thumb.

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen::neutral::twisted::arrow::shock::smile::???::cool::evil::grin::idea::oops::razz::roll::wink::cry::eek::lol::mad::sad::!::?::beer::beer: