http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/30118_The_Soros-McClellan_Connection/comments/#ctop

However, McClellan wrote that he did not believe Bush or the White House “deliberately or consciously sought to deceive the American people.”

So. First Bush lied. Then, he didn’t lie. Which one is it? Only worms(DemoncRats) write(or edit) like that. It’s no surprise Soros is involved. What a moron.

I don’t have to know anymore than I do now to know that this Doughboy is a self-serving lowlife with a few connections looking to make a buck and a name anyway he can. Guaranteed he is a liar.

He got his feelings hurt, his mommy got bounced in the primary and now he’s lashing out. This will last one week before the left has buried it.

See this is where I have a problem, if this guy was so twisted up about what he had to do day in and day out, why not resign and then go about screaming about what you find is wrong until waiting for what is three years since he was White House mouthpiece?

I could buy the courage of his convictions even if I don’t buy what he is selling if he had resigned and the next day started speaking out, this is America still and as long as there are libtards and moonbats amongst us he would still have an audience, plus his publisher is in cahoots withe Soros.

I am tired of the demedia pretending that nobody had a problem with Saddam until Bush 43 was elected. The whole world except the Islamofascists understood Saddam had to be ousted when Saddam invaded Kuwait.

Bush 41 was excorciated by the demedia for not going into Baghdad and taking out Saddam and liberating Iraq during Gulf War I. Bill Clinton called repeatedly for the ouster of Saddam during his two terms as was reported extensively in the demedia. Even Ted Kennedy at the time admitted to the demedia Saddam had WMD. And how many enless (and useless) UN resolutions against Saddam reported in the demedia? And of course Congress had to have their 15 minutes in the demedia to publicly give their approval to go to war - which they did.

But I understand the democrats and their accomplices real motive in attempting to erase 15+ years of history of their backing to remove Saddam along with the backing of Bush 43 to go to war with Saddam. By disassociating themselves from the decision making to go to war they can admit the war was wrong with no political repercussions hoping their anti-war position will benefit them in the SHORT POLITICAL RUN. That would certainly explain their opposition to the surge and their eagerness to label it as a defeat even before the surge began.

The only thing which prevents many Americans from understanding this concept is the dems enablers/accomplices in the demedia who continue to assist the dems in rewriting history. Enter the latest….Scott McClellan.