Comments on: Hitler Assassination Attempt Kills Tom Cruise Instead

By: jasjfarrell

jasjfarrell — Tue, 13 May 2008 02:30:24 +0000

His hat is crooked. Verboten.

By: mike3481

mike3481 — Tue, 13 May 2008 02:32:48 +0000

Pat, when a film gets a stink on it like this, is there any hope for it, success wise?

By: drillanwr (hembra blanca típica)

drillanwr (hembra blanca típica) — Tue, 13 May 2008 02:40:32 +0000

mike3481

One word …

Waterworld

By: drillanwr (hembra blanca típica)

drillanwr (hembra blanca típica) — Tue, 13 May 2008 02:48:16 +0000

You know … I’ll admit it (as if you all haven’t already figured it out) … I’m a sucker for a guy in uniform.

Even the bloody Soviets looked good.

But I have always been repulsed by the damn German/Nazi uniform (and with good reason).

I think they were very successful in completely flushing themselves from the pedestal that men in uniform stand on.

Hell, even the Chi-Coms seem to rank higher.

By: Tom

Tom — Tue, 13 May 2008 02:50:03 +0000

“Hitler Assassination Attempt Kills Tom Cruise Instead”

I love that headline..hilarious! I guess a few of these are in order!

By: Pat Dollard

Pat Dollard — Tue, 13 May 2008 03:03:32 +0000

Mike3481

It’s not the stink that kills it so much, but the simple fact that if there’s a stink this big, the movie is almost certainly shitty.

By: mike3481

mike3481 — Tue, 13 May 2008 03:11:15 +0000

By: FTL

FTL — Tue, 13 May 2008 03:18:36 +0000

Tom outta’ go take L. Ron Hubbard’s ol’ Jag for a cruise & give films a long break… & BTW that footage was not damaged in the labs. It was insured & the dailies sucked so some homie in the lab threw some sand in the bath. & STILL after re-shoots it still sux?!

By: Leatherneck

Leatherneck — Tue, 13 May 2008 04:59:30 +0000

Yet another Hollywood Nazi movie I won’t be seeing.

Stalin & his clique did far more damage than the Nazis could ever dream of.

That’s the point. It’s a diversionary tactic to sway peoples attention away from the truth & inevitable failure of socialism.

RAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! Look everybody!! It’s a NAZZZIIII!!

Joseph Stalin? Who the fuck is Joseph Stalin???

By: mike3481

mike3481 — Tue, 13 May 2008 05:10:24 +0000

Leatherneck

By: Ranger

Ranger — Tue, 13 May 2008 09:24:51 +0000

Haha yea Pat, good headline.

By: Quincy

Quincy — Tue, 13 May 2008 13:47:29 +0000

Leatherneck

Right on man!!!

Been saying that for years.

By: Quincy

Quincy — Tue, 13 May 2008 13:50:45 +0000

Regardless what you think of Hitler.

Stauffenberg was a fuckin rat.

By: Bill Smith

Bill Smith — Tue, 13 May 2008 14:52:08 +0000

Leatherneck has a point.

The nazis and the soviets had a treaty before WWII. They were buddies. “nazi” after all, is a contraction of the German words for National Socialism. But then Hitler double crossed them, invaded Poland, and the soviet propaganda, disinformation, and other organs of the state turned on a dime, and portrayed the nazis as evil RIGHT wingers, and that con job continues to this day.

By: Quincy

Quincy — Tue, 13 May 2008 15:04:12 +0000

Hold on Bill.

Hitler attacked Poland to gain back Prussian land lost after WW1. Also German minorities in Poland werre being brutalized. It would be no different than Americans attacking a country that was harming US citizens. Besides
The Soviets invaded the OTHER half of Poland yet no one declared war on them.

Also Hitler attacked because the Soviets were going to attack later in 1941. The Communists wanted total control of Europe.

By: TedB

TedB — Tue, 13 May 2008 16:01:15 +0000

I may hold an unpopular opinion, but I think the Germans had the best tailors. Their uniforms were the shit! They looked badass and stylish.

They were pricks, but well bespoke.