Petraeus Reshaping Army As State Of The Art Jihadikilling Machine - With Video
World War II’s over, guys…
General David Petraeus is promoting over 100 Colonels with on-the-ground counter-insurgency experience to the rank of General in what appears to be the beginning phases of a “re-shaping” of the Army.
The conventional Military Force vs Military Force appears less likely with respect to future conflicts and National Defense than fighting the Global War On Terror in the manner that we have seen, and succeeded at within the last few years in Iraq & Afghanistan.
Check this out…
Then there’s this from The Washington Post:
An Army board headed by Gen. David H. Petraeus has selected several combat-tested counterinsurgency experts for promotion to the rank of brigadier general, sifting through more than 1,000 colonels to identify a handful of innovative leaders who will shape the future Army, according to current and former senior Army officers.
The choices suggest that the unusual decision to put the top U.S. officer in Iraq in charge of the promotions board has generated new thinking on the qualities of a successful Army officer — and also deepened Petraeus’s imprint on the Army. Petraeus, who spent nearly four of the past five years in Iraq and has seen many of the colonels in action there, faces confirmation hearings next week to take charge of Central Command, which oversees U.S. forces in the Middle East and Central Asia.
Army Secretary Pete Geren asked Petraeus to head the board, which convened in late 2007, and instructed it to stress innovation in selecting a new generation of one-star generals, the officers said. Several of the colonels widely expected to appear on the resulting promotion list, which has not yet been released, are considered unconventional thinkers who were effective in the Iraq campaign, in many cases because they embraced a counterinsurgency doctrine that Petraeus helped craft, the officials said.
They include Special Forces Col. Ken Tovo, a veteran of multiple Iraq tours who recently led a Special Operations task force there; Col. H.R. McMaster, a senior Petraeus adviser known for leading a successful counterinsurgency effort in the Iraqi city of Tall Afar, and Col. Sean MacFarland, who created a network of patrol bases in Ramadi that helped curb violence in the capital of Anbar Province, according to the officers.
In an article published this year on the lessons of Iraq and Afghanistan, McMaster challenged what he called the military’s preoccupation in the 1990s with technology, to the neglect of the political and cultural dimensions of war. Military leaders must end the “self-delusion” that high-tech weapons and a “minimalist” commitment of forces can solve conflicts, he wrote.
The promotion list has attracted keen attention from younger Army officers who are weary from multiple tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. “This sends a signal to the junior officers who are laboring in the trenches, literally, that the Army is trying to cast itself in a new mold,” said retired Army Maj. Gen. Robert H. Scales Jr., a defense consultant and former head of the Army War College. “The quickest way to change the Army is at the brigadier general level. That is the surest way to turn the ship, because those names are how those young officers intuit where the Army is going,” he said.
The one-star-general list, which requires congressional approval, was expected to be released months ago but has been delayed, partly due to a requirement that to qualify for promotion Army colonels must attend a course designed to improve their understanding of other military services. Several colonels who served under Petraeus — including some said to be on the list — are currently attending or are scheduled to attend the 10-week course, called Joint Professional Military Education Phase II in Norfolk.
In the past, a number of colonels received waivers and were promoted without taking the class. But Army officials said the Pentagon has pushed to minimize that practice. Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, is a proponent of the joint education, said committee spokeswoman Lara Battles.
Promotion boards are sworn to secrecy, and none of the known board members or officers said to be selected would discuss the issue.
The Petraeus board included several prominent veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the officials said. These include Lt. Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, who has headed the Joint Special Operations Command, Central Command Forward. The Senate is expected to act this month on McChrystal’s nomination to become director of the Joint Staff. Another member was Lt. Gen. Peter Chiarelli, the senior military aide to Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates who served twice as a senior U.S. commander in Iraq and was nominated last month to become the Army vice chief of staff, the officials said. Also on the board was Maj. Gen. Anthony Cucolo, who has experience in Afghanistan, they said.
Currently, the Army has 4,000 colonels and about 150 one-star generals. The board first conducts a yes or no vote on about 1,000 to 2,000 colonels, who are each ranked. Then the presiding officer determines where to draw the cutoff for a pool of a few hundred whose files will be discussed individually. Several colonels who worked under Petraeus have already been selected for promotion, including brigade commanders who served under him when he commanded the 101st Airborne Division in Iraq, as well as one who recently headed his command initiatives group.
According to Scales, the word in Army circles is that McMaster will be given a key role shaping future Army doctrine. “We are in a very similar place now to the period after Vietnam in the 1970s, when a lot of officers returned and everyone was asking ‘What is next?’ ” said Scales. “It’s time now for the Army to think about the future and institutionally anticipate the changing nature of war.”
(Washington Post)
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
Of course the Libs will be pissed. Saying that Partreaus is turning us into a military State. Then they’ll say that we’re still loosing the war, and that promoting people who kill innocent Iraqis is a war crime and Bush should be executed. Although they’ll probably be alot less coherent in this. For some reason I just can’t lower my intelligence to their level.
May 15th, 2008 at 8:46 amI am proud on him and on the fact that his family originates from my country (The Netherlands)
May 15th, 2008 at 9:02 amIt’s about time! Better look out iran and syria, I believe your at the end of a gun barrel
Go General Petraeus!!!!!! Kick some ass and to hell with what the libs think or say! Remember, General, the libs are under their desks hiding–there’s a war on.
May 15th, 2008 at 9:26 amPetraeus is clearly destined to be one of the greater figures from US history.
May 15th, 2008 at 9:27 amHow anyone who calls themselves an American can vote for a Democrat is beyond me. It is like handing the guy who wants to kill you a gun.
May 15th, 2008 at 11:09 am
General David Petraeus 
May 15th, 2008 at 1:24 pmhmmm….. 10K+ gang related crimes in L.A. County in 2006…. maybe after this IRAQ thing……
May 15th, 2008 at 1:29 pmCan’t believe the board didn’t do their usual PC thing. Army promotion boards are rife with PC promotions based on gender or race.
If you have 100 candidates and 50 slots to fill a portion of those slots are filled by gender or race considerations.
Some of the best qualified individuals are always dissed in favor of PC considerations.
Most promotions are well-deserved, those that are not, aren’t.
In sum, putting warfighters in senior leadership slots above the Col rank makes sense. You want planners who understand the needs of the soldiers on the ground; and who are well-grounded in current battle doctrine.
Gen Petraeous is a star. Let’s hope he makes it into politics at some point. He’d be a better candidate than the current crop of Moe, Larry, and Stupid.
May 15th, 2008 at 2:12 pm“Promotion boards are sworn to secrecy, and none of the known board members or officers said to be selected would discuss the issue. ”
There is something the media almost never sees, people with secrets and integrity to keep their mouths shut.
May 15th, 2008 at 2:55 pmThere is an outstanding book I recommed to all titled “The Savage Wars of Peace.” The author explains that the civil war and the two world wars were glaring exceptions in the long list of armed interventions in this country’s history. He shows how small patrols working with the locals have a long history of success and were leading to success in Viet Nam when liberals pulled the plug. Current events seem to support his thesis.
May 15th, 2008 at 3:00 pmPromotion boards are an open secret to anyone who’s ever been a part of one.
May 15th, 2008 at 5:32 pmGen. David H. Petraeus for President. We can dream can’t we.
May 15th, 2008 at 5:34 pmGo read the comments on the WaPo article; they’re make you choke. Petraeus is a butt-licking second-rater, dincha know? And Iraq will instantly dissolve into chaos as soon as it’s permitted to? Etc., etc.
May 15th, 2008 at 7:39 pmI was really disappointed with our strategy underneath Rumsfeld, but with Gates/Petraeus leading a fundamental reassessment of the Army it is making me question my own thinking.
Six months ago I would have been closer to saying we should withdraw from Iraq, but it’s these intelligent brave men who are making me know we don’t have a “losing strategy” afterall.
May 15th, 2008 at 9:00 pm