San Francisco “Taxing” The Homeless?
Well, indirectly, that is …
Leave it to THE most liberal/leftist city in the nation to figure out a way to keep person-to-person charity away from those in need, and “filter” it through the government’s control/pockets.
(S.F.Chronicle)
S.F. parking meters retooled to aid homeless
Rather than tossing loose change into a panhandler’s empty cup, San Francisco officials want you instead to slide your spare quarters and nickels into a homeless meter.
The city’s latest attempt to deal with one of its most vexing problems will be announced in coming weeks in the form of 10 old parking meters installed in some of the most heavily panhandled areas, The Chronicle has learned.
Money deposited in the meters would go directly to charities that help the homeless. The goal, officials say, is to reduce panhandling and to educate tourists and residents about the problem of giving money directly to people on the streets.
“The reason people are panhandling is because there’s a market for panhandling,” Mayor Gavin Newsom said Monday. “We’re not helping these individuals by handing out cash. If there was strong evidence to suggest this helped people turn their lives around, we would not be using this approach.”
The bright orange meters, donated by the city’s Department of Parking and Traffic, will be scattered along places like Market Street and Van Ness Avenue that typically attract a steady stream of panhandlers every day. The meters will be accompanied by signs telling people how they can give money to help the homeless.
The slogan for the program and accompanying advertising campaign will be plastered on the meters: “Be a part of change. Don’t give change.”
The plan is to have the Department of Parking and Traffic employees who collect money from parking meters also collect money from the homeless meters. The money would be divided among local nonprofit organizations, Newsom said.
A handful of cities around the country, including Denver and Baltimore, have installed homeless meters in recent years. And while the programs haven’t necessarily been lucrative, some cities have seen less panhandling as a result.
Newsom and his homelessness czar, Dariush Kayhan, say it’s worth a try.
“This is not going to solve poverty,” Kayhan said. “But it is another strategy to see if we can save lives out there.”
Local advocates for the homeless, however, laughed - and gasped - when told about the idea Monday.
Sister Bernie Galvin, executive director of Religious Witness with Homeless People, called the meter idea “utterly ridiculous.” She said it was based on a stereotype that all panhandlers use every nickel and dime to buy drugs and alcohol.
“Forget the children, forget the mothers who are struggling to raise their family homeless or in inadequate housing,” she said. “Will the city never give up on trying to find ways to make the lives of homeless people harder?”
Homeless advocate and community organizer James Chionsini liked the idea at first - until he realized you don’t actually get parking for your change. Then he said it sounded like a political stunt that would have very little impact on funding homelessness programs or stopping panhandlers.
“I’d rather give it to a panhandler than put it in a meter personally,” he said. “At least if you give it to them personally, you’re going to get a smile.” Newsom contends that most of the panhandlers in San Francisco aren’t actually homeless but are supplementing government assistance with the money people give them.
Over the years, city leaders have struggled to curb the panhandling problem, which is largely centered around tourist areas and downtown. City officials estimate that about 150 panhandlers are on city streets on any given day.
In 2003, the San Francisco Hotel Council funded a $65,000 billboard campaign that linked panhandling to drug abuse and sexually transmitted diseases.
One ad read, “Today we rode a cable car, visited Alcatraz and supported a drug habit.”
Homeless advocates said the campaign was mean-spirited, and then-state Sen. John Burton took out ads of his own reading, “Jesus gave money to poor people on the streets of Galilee.”
Also in 2003, then-Supervisor Newsom authored Proposition M, a voter-approved measure that banned aggressive panhandling in public places.
Paul Boden, director of the Western Regional Advocacy Project that deals with homelessness issues, recalled attempts under previous mayors to place jars by cash registers in businesses and sell coupons for services that could then be handed over to panhandlers. He said the meters idea was especially “asinine” and San Francisco’s all-time second-worst idea to curb panhandling.
The worst, he said, was a failed proposal during Willie Brown’s administration to equip homeless people with credit-card machines like those used for retail purchases. People could swipe their cards and choose how much to donate, with 80 percent going to homeless programs and 20 percent to the individual panhandlers.
“It’s not fair for the government to create this incredible level of poverty and then turn around to the rest of the community and say, ‘Harden your hearts and give the money to us,’ ” Boden said. “Human beings when they see other human beings are going to give a little change, and that’s good.”
But Newsom asked doubters to keep an open mind. He said aggressive panhandling is by far the top complaint he hears from people.
“I ask them to give us a chance,” he said. “If it doesn’t work, show me the evidence, and then we’ll abandon it.”
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
We were in SF for spring break, the panhandlers were out of control there. you couldn’t take four steps without being ganged up on by multiple smelly beggars. They would congregate outside of restaurants and coffee shops and try to get to you before you put your wallet away. The only one I gave money to was an elderly lady who after I snubbed her request for money said, ‘thank you anyways, God bless you and have a good easter”. Most of the others just snarled at you for not volunteering your cash. SF has a severe problem with panhandlers, maybe taxing them will thin the herd out somewhat. I’d say the next step would be to incarcerate them and make them pick up trash or some other skill appropriate task. As a side note and as racist as this sounds, there were no Asian beggars to be seen, all other races were represented but no asians in a city that has the largest concentration of asians in the world outside of Asia. Just sayin’.
May 14th, 2008 at 9:21 ammaybe a little off topic but, has anyone checked out the link that fox news put out 2 months ago, you can get live feed from the marine corps recruiting center in bazerkley
May 14th, 2008 at 9:24 amlook at code pink or better yet ” code douchebaggery”
http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player06.html?liveSiteStream_::_7&Live_Site_Stream&Live%2520Stream&acc&Live%2520Stream&-1&News&180&&&new
tedders has a good point, put these people in some kind of work program where they can earn money instead of panhandling.
May 14th, 2008 at 9:32 amHouston has the same initiative, although it was more of an awareness campaign encouraging you to give to the charity as an alternative to giving out change.
May 14th, 2008 at 10:27 amI think this comment is the funniest thing I’ve seen in a long time. Talk about government denial. SF actually gives “paychecks” to their homeless. They ride the muni for free, have a lovely park to roam about, lots of services. The reason they have such a problem in SF is because it pays to be homeless in SF. That’s cause and effect, pretty boy Gavin! And an honest person would call that “strong evidence”.
May 14th, 2008 at 12:42 pmThe SF panhandlers are just the forerunners of the future Californians after SF and other Cal. politicians finish implementing their wonderful policies. We’ll all be panhandlers, panhandling for $ that the government stole from us to give to pandhandlers and other assorted losers and undeserving people like the SF sanctuary city invitees. Get it?
May 14th, 2008 at 1:09 pmThe SF panhandlers are just the forerunners of the future Californians after SF and other Cal. politicians finish implementing their wonderful policies. We’ll all be panhandlers, panhandling for $ that the government stole from us to give to pandhandlers and other assorted losers and undeserving people like the SF sanctuary city invitees. Get it?
May 14th, 2008 at 1:09 pmKim: you’re wrong. There are no paychecks for homeless people. Check out “Care Not Cash”. Newsom is famous for it.
And why is giving quarters to drunks and junkies a good idea?
May 15th, 2008 at 10:38 am