Seattle Times Editor & Hussein Dicklicker: “Hitler’s Demands Were Not Unreasonable”
You know what just struck me?
I’m sure it has already crossed your mind, but it just really sank in with me today, that the far-left is going to go to even greater extremes to get Barack Hussein Obama elected into the Oval Office, than they did when they ran “General Betrayus” ads and accosted Condi Rice with bloody hands and all of that Code Pink bullcrap to try and mess with the Petraeus/Crocker testimony on Iraq up on The Hill last year.
It probably is just starting to sink in with me because now it seems crystal clear who the Democratic nominee will be now.
And with “friends” like William Ayers, who wields a considerable insurgency-minded influence amongst impressionable rebellious college-aged kids who populate groups like the RNC Welcoming Committee and Recreate ‘68 planning big things for the DNC in August and the RNC in September, and many many left wing liberal newspaper editors/bloggers slinging shit like what you are about to read below….all I can say is…
Get ready for the wildest 6 months in American History…
This from Bruce Ramsey, the editor of the Seattle Times:
Democrats are rebuking President Bush for saying in his speech to the Knesset, here, that to “negotiate with terrorists and radicals” is “appeasement.” The Democrats took it as a slap at Barack Obama. What bothers me is the continual reference to Hitler and his National Socialists, particularly the British and French accommodation at the Munich Conference of 1938.
What Hitler was demanding was not unreasonable.
STOP!
What the fuck did he just say?
What Hitler was demanding was not unreasonable.
That’s what I thought he said…I’ll let him continue, I need to go put my fist through something.
What Hitler was demanding was not unreasonable. He wanted the German-speaking areas of Europe under German authority. He had just annexed Austria, which was German-speaking, without bloodshed. There were two more small pieces of Germanic territory: the free city of Danzig and the Sudetenland, a border area of what is now the Czech Republic.
We live in an era when you do not change national borders for these sorts of reasons. But in 1938 it was different. Germany’s eastern and western borders had been redrawn 19 years before—and not to its benefit. In the democracies there was some sense of guilt with how Germany had been treated after World War I. Certainly there was a memory of the “Great War.” In 2008, we have entirely forgotten World War I, and how utterly unlike any conception of “The Good War” it was. When the British let Hitler have a slice of Czechoslovakia, they were following their historical wisdom: avoid war. War produces results far more horrible than you expected. War is a bad investment. It is not glorious. Don’t give anyone an excuse to start one.
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
My great suffering Jesus…
“When the British let Hitler have a slice of Czechoslovakia, they were following their historical wisdom: avoid war. War produces results far more horrible than you expected. War is a bad investment. It is not glorious. Don’t give anyone an excuse to start one.”
Since when did Great Britain avoid war?
For fuck’s sake, the sun never set on the British Empire!
It just so happened that there was a fucking coward calling the shots at the time, which is the way it’s shaping up today in America.
Fucking sand-headed chickenshits like Ramsey do not deserve citizenship.
May 16th, 2008 at 1:13 pmBash is right . Someone, probably Soros is buying Hussein’s way to the presidency. A lot of what is being said makes no cents. If you follow close as I do, there is a lot of look over there, don’t look over here manuevers going on. And the constant printing, speaking of the big lie. Like Israel 50 % conquered. Bull shit!! This is getting too deep, I got to have a break…
May 16th, 2008 at 1:27 pmI gotta say, guys, I really am shocked… no kidding. And after this, please no more comments about Canadian moonbats. This article is one of the most disgusting things I’ve read in quite some time… the absurdity of it is that he’s repeating Chamberlain’s mistake - taking Hitler at his word that all he wanted was…. Fucking hell, I can’t believe this stupidity. If y’all elect Obama, I’m leaving the continent.
May 16th, 2008 at 1:30 pm“War produces results far more horrible than you expected.”
May 16th, 2008 at 1:31 pmThis is just the ignorance of history our public schools and universities are producing (chiefly because those doing the teaching are ignorant). The argument being presented by this assertion is that the ultimate consequences of Hitler’s Reich, as already unfolding in the annexed areas, was minimal and acceptable to the destruction caused by WWII. Somehow, according to that editor, the slaughter of millions, millions, was a lesser evil that the millions of lives lost during combat, begun by Hitler, in a quest for an orderly socialist society across Europe.
France had signed an agreement with Czechoslovakia offering support if the country was attacked. However, Hitler could all but guarantee that in 1938, the French would do nothing. The USSR had also given Czechoslovakia a promise of help but the USSR was in internal chaos during this time and unlikely to help Czechoslovakia out. After Chamberlain and France agreed to let Hitler annex the Sudetenland, without consulting the Czechs, the Sudetenland was given to Germany immediately. The governments of Britain and France made it clear to Czechoslovakia that if the Czechs rejected this solution, they would have to fight Germany by themselves. Hitler promised that this was the “last problem to be solved”, no more territory disputes. “Peace in our time”, was what Chamberlain told the British, “Peace in our time”, We can trust this Hitler fellow! After all, his requests are reasonable and he promises this will be the last bit of land that he wants!
It didn’t take until March 1939 when Hitler took over the remaining Czech territories which became the German satellite, Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, that his promise was officially broken. Next came Poland on September 1st 1939, Hitler and Stalin split up the country as pre planned, England and France declared war on Germany but not on the Soviets.
That’s the lesson Nobama and the Dhimmis are failing to understand about Bush’s address to the Knesset. The leaders of North Korea, Iran, Syria, Venezuela and the rest CANNOT BE TRUSTED, they are flim flam artists in the vein of Hitler, the only thing they understand is overwhelming brute force. Look at Iran and North Koreas history of lies and manipulation! You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure out they have no qualms about lying to the worlds governments, they are very adapt at finding the weakpoints of democratic peoples. People have the audacity to question Bush’s intelligence when that bozo Obama thinks we have 57 states and that terrorist leaders just want to have a nice talk! Jeesh, what a DUMBASS!
May 16th, 2008 at 1:40 pm“What Hitler was demanding was not unreasonable.”
I KNOW!!! SAME GOES FOR AHMADICKWAD!!!
May 16th, 2008 at 1:41 pmLet’s just give him Israel and he’ll stfu and we can have peace in our time.
Fuck it, let’s bring it on, I am tired of these socialists and marxists fucking up this country.
We know McCarthy was right, the communists began infiltration into this nation after WWII. The 60’s made them mainstream.
At least Reagan pushed back.
Now there is no rights or wrongs; ‘if it feels good do it’ still reverberates today.
Besides the mainstreaming of perversion, we now are endangering our economy and therefore our security for a bunch of idiotic ideas that we can control the Earths climate.
We are endangering the availability of food stocks around the world because we think using food as fuel is good for gaia.
There is a real threat to the freedom of mankind by a bunch of uncompromising zealots that are gaining the most terrifying weapons known to man and we choose to ignore history and think we can talk them out of their stated goals.
Choose a side and let’s go.
May 16th, 2008 at 1:52 pmummm, when Hitler took Sudetenland….well then he immediately took all of Czechoslovakia. So by allowing Hitler to annex that “slice” of Czechoslovakia they really gave him the go ahead to take whatever he please, thereby condemning everyone in those countries to whatever teh Nazis pleased… I guess that was a good move…………………………..Dumbass
May 16th, 2008 at 1:58 pmThis entire issue goes back to when England was a global power. It threw it all away just because it could never accept Germany as THE power in Continental Europe. A status which it rightly earned just as we have earned our as a super power.
Hitler offered many, many , many times to come to an agreement with England to help her economically and militarily. His deal was to convince England to stay away from the US and jump on board with Europe. Thus leaving the US isolated.
Poland and Czechslavakia were both countries that were “created” after WW1. They were puppet states of the “democracies” both used the truncheon on its people. Both were repressive a fact lost on many of the “experts”
Of course none of this is ever told.
It starting to change Pat Buchananon has a book out at the end of the month explaining all this.
Poland was suckered into war in 1939 by England. France never really had its heart in defending Poland. Besides the US forgot to “liberate” the Poles when it all ended in 1945.
Patton was the only guy with the guts to talk straight about the Commies and paid the price in the end.
OK Dan you can come out of the closet now
May 16th, 2008 at 2:00 pmand accuse me of being a Nazi. Bla Bla
Dan
We have no Socialism at all hear, The tax money goes the
Neocons, Theocons and Big Business NOT the people.
INCIDENTALLY Norman Lear is a great American who happens to be Jewish. I amire him very much.
May 16th, 2008 at 2:04 pm“War is a bad investment.”
This is the statement of a coward who would not fight to save his own mother’s life. I suppose that, if our forefathers were of the same mind as he, we’d be living in the “British States of America.”
Frakin’ communist coward.
May 16th, 2008 at 3:48 pmI love little revisionist liberals that want to think they’re right.
May 16th, 2008 at 4:33 pm