The Radical Idiocy Of The New Left
I could whip up some zingy “drill” commentary here, but the following pretty much sums it up for me …
I cried when they shot Medgar Evers
Tears ran down my spine
I cried when they shot Mr. Kennedy
As though I’d lost a father of mine
But Malcolm X got what was coming
He got what he asked for this time
So love me, love me, love me, I’m a liberal
I go to civil rights rallies
And I put down the old D.A.R.
I love Harry and Sidney and Sammy
I hope every colored boy becomes a star
But don’t talk about revolution
That’s going a little bit too far
So love me, love me, love me, I’m a liberal
I cheered when Humphrey was chosen
My faith in the system restored
I’m glad the commies were thrown out
of the A.F.L. C.I.O. board
I love Puerto Ricans and Negros
as long as they don’t move next door
So love me, love me, love me, I’m a liberal
The people of old Mississippi
Should all hang their heads in shame
I can’t understand how their minds work
What’s the matter don’t they watch Les Crain?
But if you ask me to bus my children
I hope the cops take down your name
So love me, love me, love me, I’m a liberal
I read New republic and Nation
I’ve learned to take every view
You know, I’ve memorized Lerner and Golden
I feel like I’m almost a Jew
But when it comes to times like Korea
There’s no one more red, white and blue
So love me, love me, love me, I’m a liberal
I vote for the democratic party
They want the U.N. to be strong
I go to all the Pete Seeger concerts
He sure gets me singing those songs
I’ll send all the money you ask for
But don’t ask me to come on along
So love me, love me, love me, I’m a liberal
Once I was young and impulsive
I wore every conceivable pin
Even went to the socialist meetings
Learned all the old union hymns
But I’ve grown older and wiser
And that’s why I’m turning you in
So love me, love me, love me, I’m a liberal - Phil Ochs
I don’t know what they have to say
It makes no difference anyway;
Whatever it is, I’m against it! - Groucho Marx as Quincy Adams Wagstaff, “Horsefeathers”
‘68: RADICAL IDIOCY
NIHILISM & THE ‘NEW LEFT’
by Rich Lowry
“WHY don’t we just vote to strike tonight - and we’ll decide to morrow what we’re striking for?”
Those were the words of a student protester thoughtfully deliberating at Yale University, as recounted by Roger Kimball in his book on the left, “The Long March.” It was a question that captured much of the heedless spirit of the student demonstrations of the 1960s, for which “May 1968″ is shorthand.
That spring 40 years ago saw a radical takeover of Columbia University - eventually duplicated at other elite campuses - and student protests around the world. In France, the government was rocked to its foundations; in the Eastern Bloc, a crevice was opened up in the Berlin Wall. Here at home, campus life became synonymous with a straitened leftism, and the post-World War II political consensus shattered.
Before we had our long national nightmare (Watergate), we had our long national temper tantrum. In America, student protests were an indulgence of the privileged, a wail by baby boomer kids raised in unprecedented affluence against their parents’ authority.
To accuse of “fascism” a generation that bled in the mud of Normandy fighting the Axis took a massive historical ignorance and overweening self-regard. The New Left had both.
Now, we honor the baby boomers’ parents as “the Greatest Generation,” but we haven’t given up the romance of their kids. We remember the ’60s protesters as beatific flower children, aching idealists opposed to the Vietnam War. Airbrushed from the popular imagination is the nihilism, the thrill of the wrecking ball, that animated the vanguard of the New Left.
Means relate to ends. If a movement thrives on the takeover of buildings, non-negotiable demands and threats of violence, it is an unmistakable sign it is coercive and illiberal, no matter how vehemently it invokes “liberation.”
The Columbia protests were led by Mark Rudd, whose idea of a bon mot was “Up against the wall, motherf—–!” From Columbia’s relationship to a Pentagon-affiliated think tank and its plan to build a gym on a city park, Rudd’s compatriots concluded that the school was irredeemably militaristic and racist. They occupied university buildings and took a dean hostage before being cleared out (none too gently) by the cops.
Elsewhere, university officials gave in to their tormenters, most notoriously at Cornell a year later. When black students occupied a university building - ostentatiously arming themselves - and demanded that disciplinary action against three black students be dropped, the faculty initially stood its ground. When the students escalated their threats, the faculty reversed itself in a signal act of cowardice.
The parents against which the students rebelled - as represented by the college administrations - buckled. College presidents who were the finest flowering of post-World War II liberalism gave in to the radicalism, politicizing American higher education and trashing its standards. “The maturation of the student protest movement turned out to be part of the infantilization of the American intelligentsia,” Kimball writes.
The freedoms fought for in the student revolt soon curdled into the opposite: free speech became speech codes; sexual liberation became the regime of sexual harassment; civil rights became quotas. Meanwhile, Mark Rudd and a fringe of the New Left spun off into the Weather Underground, which took the destructive spirit of the campus protests to its logical conclusion in a campaign of terrorist bombings. Jonah Goldberg reminds us in his book “Liberal Fascism” that the radical left committed roughly 250 attacks from September 1969 to May 1970.
If the academics gave in, another segment of the parents resisted. They were the Nixon voters, reacting against the disorder and cultural radicalism with which liberalism became identified. Republicans held the White House for 28 of the next 40 years, and the alternative history of the 1960s is the rise of the right. Even now, with Barack Obama dogged by his association with former Weather Underground member Bill Ayers, the Democratic Party’s challenge is to free itself from the taint of 1968.
(NYPost)
“WHY don’t we just vote to strike tonight - and we’ll decide to morrow what we’re striking for?”
That line sums up what hippies are all about. It doesn’t really matter what the issue is or how illogical their arguments are. They will indignantly stand their ground, no matter how often or how soundly they are proven wrong.
When you really examine hippies closely, they are short-sided, narrow-minded, selfish attention whores.
May 10th, 2008 at 3:13 pmThe hippies parents won WWII, they freed SK. And what were the accomplishments of the hippies? With all their ranting about tin soldiers and Nixon’s bombing, they left a legacy of 40 million dead babies, 2 million dead Cambodians 1.5 million dead Vietnamese, 800,000 dead Laotians. They gave us rock n roll and Saul Alinsky, Bernadine Dorn, Wiliam Ayers, Jane Freaking Fonda, the SLA, SDS, and the present anarchy that exists in our school system.
They’re f*uck ups of the highest order. They had and continue to have no redeeming value. The spoiled brats of great Americans have turned this country into a cesspool of leftist, Marxist crud.
Lets use their terms and their tactics and have a counter-revolution. Give them and their progeny a taste of their own medicine.
Let em smoke their last bowl while hanging from a tree.
May 10th, 2008 at 3:26 pmYou also must, MUST know that it is hazardous to your health to go anywhere near a hippie, let alone come in contact with one. To do so my give you hippieitus which is incurable.
May 10th, 2008 at 3:32 pmyou mean hippietitis!
May 10th, 2008 at 5:14 pmI say we box them all up and drop them on Tehran and see what happens
May 11th, 2008 at 5:22 amNo i’m pretty sure you’ll just get hepatitis.
May 11th, 2008 at 6:07 am