US Military Holds 500 Youths In Iraq

May 19th, 2008 Posted By drillanwr.

1

Children? … Children?!?

These children were not yanked from the teddy bears in their bunk beds in the middle of the night by the evil American military … or ’swept-up’ in a raid on a video game arcade … or even in some perceived round-up of innocent high school students while they dutifully tended their studies at their desks.

They were snagged/captured doing VERY adult war-related/terror-related activities … and quite probably are responsible for many deaths of American and Coalition forces.

So, send in the U.N.’s Angelina Jolie to hold their tiny little hands …

The U.S. military is holding about 500 juveniles suspected of being “unlawful enemy combatants” in detention centers in Iraq and has about 10 detained in Afghanistan, the United States has told the United Nations.

A total of 2,500 youths under the age of 18 have been detained, almost all in Iraq, for periods up to a year or more in President Bush’s anti-terrorism campaign since 2002, the United States reported last week to the U.N.’s Committee on the Rights of the Child.

Civil liberties groups such as the International Justice Network and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) denounced the detentions as abhorrent, and a violation of U.S. treaty obligations.

In the periodic report to the United Nations on U.S. compliance with the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the United States confirmed that “as of April 2008, the United States held about 500 juveniles in Iraq.”

“The juveniles that the United States has detained have been captured engaging in anti-coalition activity, such as planting Improvised Explosive Devices, operating as lookouts for insurgents, or actively engaged in fighting against U.S. and Coalition forces,” the U.S. report said.

The majority are believed to be 16 or 17 years old. In the United States a 17-year-old can enlist in the U.S. army, with parental consent.

The report said that of the total of 2,500 juveniles jailed since 2002, all but 100 had been picked up in Iraq. Of the remainder, most were swept up in Afghanistan.

A total of eight juveniles have been held at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, but all were released from 2004 to 2006.

“It remains uncertain the exact age of these individuals, as most of them did not know their date of birth or even the year they were born,” the report says. But U.S. military doctors who evaluated them believed that three were under age 16.

In Afghanistan, “as of April 2008, there are approximately 10 juveniles being held at the Bagram Theater Internment Facility as unlawful enemy combatants,” the report said.

In Bagram, a U.S. military spokesman, Marine 1st Lt. Richard K. Ulsh, told the AP on Sunday: “At any time there are up to 625 detainees being held at the Bagram Theater Internment Facility. There are no detainees being held under the age of 16 and, without getting into specifics due to the frequent fluctuation in the number of detainees being held, we can tell you that there are currently less than 10 detainees being held under the age of 18.”

Civil liberties groups were outraged.

“It’s shocking to me that the U.S. government has not figured out a way to keep children out of adult prisons. It’s outrageous, and it is not making us any safer, I can say that about Afghanistan from personal experience,” Tina M. Foster, the executive director of the International Justice Network, said Sunday.

Her group brought lawsuits on behalf of the Guantanamo detainees in 2006, and has taken on the cases of adult detainees in Bagram. She said the U.S. military does not release the names of juveniles it is holding in Bagram, so her group is trying to learn who they are by finding Afghan relatives.

“It is shocking to know that the U.S. is holding hundreds of juveniles in Iraq and Afghanistan, and even more disturbing that there is no comprehensive policy in place that will protect their rights as children,” Jamil Dakwar, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Human Rights Program, said in a statement. “Juveniles and former child soldiers should be treated first and foremost as candidates for rehabilitation and reintegration into society, not subjected to further victimization.”

According to the ACLU, the lack of protections and consideration for the juvenile status of detainees violates the obligations of the U.S. under the Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict that the U.S. ratified in 2002, as well as universally accepted international norms.

The U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child is scheduled to question the U.S. delegation on its compliance with its obligations on May 22 in Geneva.

The U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child was adopted by the General Assembly in 1989, with backing at the time from the U.S. government of President Bill Clinton, and with strong lobbying from then-first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, who now is competing for the Democratic Party presidential nomination with Barack Obama.

(AP)


    • Young Americans Documentary
    • Learn More About Pat
    • blogroll

      • A Soldier's Perspective
      • Ace Of Spades
      • American Soldier
      • Ann Coulter
      • Attack Machine
      • Bill Ardolino
      • Bill Roggio
      • Black Five
      • Blonde Sagacity
      • Breitbart
      • Chicagoray
      • Confederate Yankee
      • Day by Day Cartoon
      • Euphoric Reality
      • Flopping Aces
      • Free Republic
      • Frontier Web Design
      • Hot Air
      • Hugh Hewitt
      • Ian Schwartz
      • Instapundit
      • Jules Crittenden
      • Little Green Footballs
      • Matt Sanchez
      • Michael Fumento
      • Michael Yon
      • Michelle Malkin
      • Military.com
      • Missiles And Stilletos
      • Move America Forward
      • Mudville Gazette
      • Pass The Ammo
      • Protest Warrior
      • Roger L. Simon
      • Sportsman's Outfit
      • Stop The ACLU
      • TCOverride
      • The Belmont Club
      • The Big God Blog
      • The Crimson Blog
      • The Daily Gut
      • The Drudge Report
      • The PoliTicking Timebomb
      • The Pundit Review
      • Veteran's Affairs Documentary

6 Responses

  1. 0311YutYut

    Fuck you! Let them go? You aren’t the one in Iraq who will get killed when we release these terrorists. A bullet from an AK47 being fired by a teenager will kill my ass just as easily as a bullet being fired by an adult. Besides, the teenagers are more likely to rat out their buddies. I know that one from experience.

  2. AFITgrad86

    Here they go again … trying to apply (liberal) Western standards to another culture. When will these idiots get it through their heads that these ‘children’ are considered adult at age 13 or 14?

    I enlisted at age 17 (I looked about 14 or 15) but was entrusted with all the responsibility of my 18 to 21 year-old peers.

    Get a grip!!

  3. Poe

    Yet another reason not to take any prisoners. :twisted:

  4. Rob

    The ACLU?! When will the ACLU jut go the fuck away? Seriously. Bullshit lawsuits. See, this is why we’re going to loose this. Because we have people willing to fight FOR the Terrorists’ rights on OUR side. Moreover we have people who are salivating at the chance to bring charges against the troops, let alone insult them.

  5. drillanwr (hembra blanca típica)

    “… And when you personalize the war and you say you’re killing someone’s kids, then they, in turn, think they can kill somebody …”

    Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) regarding the US military killing Uday and Qusay Hussein (KNOWN rapists, murderers, torturers, Saddam’s “children”.

  6. Michelle

    I am with you 0311. If you are old enough to fire a gun, you are old enough to go to prison for it. Look at all the kids in juvie here in America. If prison is good enough for them, why not the ones trying to kill us?

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen::neutral::twisted::arrow::shock::smile::???::cool::evil::grin::idea::oops::razz::roll::wink::cry::eek::lol::mad::sad::!::?::beer::beer: