US Should Target Militants In Pakistan-Afghan Paper
Ya don’t say….
KABUL, May 26 (Reuters) - The United States should target militant bases in Pakistan, an Afghan state-controlled paper said on Monday, reacting to a threat by a Pakistani Taliban leader to carry out attacks in Afghanistan.
Afghanistan and Pakistan, while both U.S. allies, have had strained relations, with Kabul accusing Islamabad of harbouring Taliban and al Qaeda militants and allowing them to direct and carry out attacks from Pakistani soil.
The Hewad newspaper called on Pakistan’s government to review its stance on negotiations with the militants and not allow such deals to threaten Afghanistan.
“Similarly, the United States of America which heads now the international campaign against terrorism, needs to focus all its attention on the terrorists’ genuine nests,” the state-run daily said in an editorial, referring to militant bases in Pakistani tribal areas along the Afghan border.
Faced with a wave of suicide attacks over the past year, Pakistan has begun negotiations with Taliban militants who control much of the mountainous region on its side of the border with Afghanistan and many Pakistani troops have left the area.
Pakistani Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud has said he would carry on fighting Afghan and foreign forces in Afghanistan whatever the outcome of the peace talks.
Mehsud’s comments were clear testimony to the fact that certain circles in Pakistan did not wish to see a secure and stable Afghanistan, the Hewad said, without elaborating further.
AFGHAN DELEGATION
NATO, which leads a 50,000-strong force in Afghanistan, said on Sunday the Pakistan peace talks had already led to an increase in insurgent attacks within Afghanistan.
The newspaper said the tribal areas on the Pakistani side of the border were used as training and supply bases for the militants.
Ties between Afghanistan and Pakistan, who have historical border disputes, have seen many ups and downs.
Thousands of Afghan Taliban and several hundred al Qaeda members are thought to have fled to Pakistan when U.S.-led troops overthrew the Taliban government in Afghanistan in 2001.
Some U.S. officials have not ruled out the presence of al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden and Taliban leaders in Pakistan.
Suspected U.S. strikes have killed several militants in tribal areas of Pakistan in recent years.
Afghanistan is sending a high-level delegation to Pakistan in the coming days to voice concern about the peace deals, an Afghan Defence Ministry spokesman said on Sunday.
Previous peace deals between the Pakistani government and the Taliban all broke down in violence and gave the militants time to regroup, he said.
Afghan forces, backed by more than 60,000 foreign troops, are engaged in daily battles with Taliban militants, mostly in the south and east, the areas closest to the border with Pakistan
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
Pakistan should just declare these “tribal regions” to be out of their hands and therefor beyond their protection. Anybody wants to attack them may do so with a free hand. You want to be free? Here ya go…
May 26th, 2008 at 11:49 pmIt was the Paki military that supported and encouraged the Talibastards to invade Afghanistan is the first place. Does anyone think that those same military supporters are not still supporting the Talibastards? Well no shit sherlock.
F*ck it, lets hit the militants now, before they strike Europe.
May 27th, 2008 at 2:37 amIf the Pakistan govt/army can’t enforce the rule of law in the tribal regions, then it can’t offer their protection from anti terror strikes. Which do they want, US cash handouts to stay in power, or to protect and nurture a terrorist region, they can’t have both.
May 27th, 2008 at 5:11 am