Chilling 1964 Interview With Malcolm X And The Founding Of The Black Liberation Movement
This story originally appeared in the March 30, 1964, issue of U.S.News & World Report…
“For Negroes: guns, a black political party, then total segregation in a separate Negro nation…That’s the program of “black nationalism,” the newest Negro movement. Here its leader, Malcolm X, tells why he is convinced that integration will never work in U.S.”
Now comes a Negro leader who opposes integration—and urges American Negroes to arm themselves with guns for defense against white people.
This new negro leader calls himself Malcolm X. He was once a high-ranking minister in the “Black Muslim” religious organization headed by Elijah Muhammad of Chicago.
Malcolm X recently pulled out of the Muslims’ religious hierarchy. On March 12 he announced that he is forming a new Negro movement which he describes as “black nationalism.”
In that announcement, he said: ” In areas where our people are the constant victims of brutality, and the Government seems unable or unwilling to protect them, we should form rifle clubs that can be used to defend our lives and our property in times of emergency.”
“When our people are being bitten by dogs, they are within their rights to kill those dogs.”
Malcolm X says he is still a Muslim, and the announced aims of his black nationalism are similar to those of the Black Muslims: “Complete separation” of the races, and creation of a separate “homeland” for Negros.
But Malcolm is out to win those aims through a “black political party.”
To get a clearer picture of Malcolm X’s program and his views, a member of the National Staff of U.S. News & World Report interviewed him in New York City:
Q Malcolm X, why do you oppose integration?
A It won’t work. It doesn’t solve the problem.
Do you know what integration really means? It means intermarriage. That’s the real point behind it. You can’t have it without intermarriage. And that would result in disintegration of both races. The Negro is better off by himself, so he can develop his character and his culture in accord with his own nature.
Negro leaders in private conversation admit this. But not publicly. They are in a spot, trying to explain to the masses of Negroes what they have got out of integration. The leaders have benefited, but the people they are trying to lead haven’t got any benefit.
Q As you see it, has the integration drive failed in this country?
A Yes, it has failed. Schools are becoming more segregated. Housing…all phases. Job segregation is one of the worst situations. Washington D.C., is one of the best examples of how integration has failed. I know about the desegregation of the theaters and restaurants and all that in Washington. But the only Negroes who have been helped by that are the Negro bourgeoisie. They are the only Negroes who can afford to go to the theaters and the white restaurants.
New York, which is supposed to be liberal, has more integration problems the Mississippi.
Q Did you think there can ever be real integration of the black and white races in this country?
A No. If it were possible, you could point to some examples of it. But there is not one place in this country which is really integrated. When people look for examples of integration, they look to other countries, like Brazil. But I don’t consider Brazil integrated, either. It is true that the Negroes and whites there have married. But Brazil is only mongrelized. Not one black man is prominent in Brazil. The Negroes there are still at the bottom.
Q What do you favor to help solve the race problem in the U.S.?
A I favor, building up living conditions, schools, jobs. That’s the heart of the problem. I want to take Negroes out of the ghetto and put them in good neighborhoods in good houses.
Q Would that make trouble, cause property values to fall?
A It is bound to depreciate the property of the white man living next door.
The first thing that the black man has got to do is straighten out the evil conditions in New York City’s Harlem and the other ghettos. Not only materially, but morally and spiritually. We’ve got to get rid of drunkenness, drug addiction, prostitution and all that. We need a program to educate the people of Harlem to a better sense of values.
When ghetto living seems normal, you have no shame, no privacy. You don’t realize that you don’t have these values when you’ve known nothing but ghetto moral conditions.
Q Won’t your program lead to increased friction between the races?
A I would say that trouble is building up. The year 1963 was a dangerous year, as everybody admits. The Negro leaders used the March on Washington as an escape valve. But the Negro masses, realized that they really got nothing. They are disenchanted. When the weather warms up, they will be in the streets demonstrating. They are tired of turning the other cheek. The whites don’t do it. Now you have the whites demonstrating against school integration.
When you have these two elements coming together, you are going to have an explosion.
Q Are you going to help produce this explosion?
A My movement won’t promote the explosion. It would come anyway. I am not for or against violence. I am for freedom, by whatever means necessary.
Q Are you in favor of a Negro political party?
A Yes. The Negro should have his own party, a black party. Negro is the wrong word. It does not have any scientific meaning. I’ll form a black political party. I won’t run for any office. But I want Negroes to be politically mature. Then there will be less likelihood of their being exploited by crooked politicians.
Q What would be the party platform?
A Freedom, justice, equality for the black people of this country. It would teach them to vote black. This doesn’t mean it will teach them to be anti-white. We are pro-black, not anti-white.
Q You claim that the Muslims are not a hate movement, yet you teach that the white man is a devil—
A We are speaking of the collective guilt of the white man. The Muslims are only expressing what the Negroes as a race believe. If I can point this up, it will make the white man see the seriousness of the problem.
Q What do you see as a real solution?
A The only real answer if for our people to go back to Africa. But that will come much later. Right now, we need immediate relief from suffering and oppression. We don’t want welfare programs. They create laziness. We need programs by which the Negro can clean up the Negro community materially and spiritually. We need jobs.
We need to own and operate our own businesses. Instead of “sitting in” we should buy in.
If the Government does not let us go back to Africa, then we should have a black nation here.
Q Which States would you want to take over for your black nation?
A I never heard Mr. Muhammad say, I hope he has in mind Florida and California. I like it where the weather is warm.
Q How many Black Muslims are there?
A No one knows but Mr. Muhammad.
Q How many do you expect to have in your organization?
A I hope to organize the 22 million black people in America.
(US News & World Report)
I cannot fully convey or describe to you how incredibly inspired I am by the above photo.
Ain’t America great?
Let’s “hope” Hussein can “change” it …
June 9th, 2008 at 11:11 am“Complete separation” of the races, and creation of a separate “homeland” for Negros.
Oh yeah, such as Zimbabwe where they have gone from food exporter to famine after chasing out the white planters.
June 9th, 2008 at 11:48 amQ How many do you expect to have in your organization?
A I hope to organize the 22 million black people in America.
Never succeeded because of Christianity so James Cone took it the next step in 1969.
June 9th, 2008 at 2:12 pmFollowing the example of Islam… just fold Judeo-Christian theology into your political ideology and you can preach it from the pulpit, or a mosque in the case of Islam.
Well, I guess old Malcolm called a few things right. Of course, he died at the hands of his own loving brotherhood so I don’t think that would be my chosen path either…
This statement caught my eye:
New York, which is supposed to be liberal, has more integration problems the Mississippi.
I’ve been all over this country and I will tell you for a fact these bastions of “liberal theology, integration and love” are the only places I frequently heard: nigger, spic, beaner, gook, kike, zipperhead, and a multitude of other pejorative terms. I can’t remember being called anything worse that ‘white man’ at Times Square.
Hypocrisy is the religion of the Progressive party.
June 9th, 2008 at 2:28 pm