<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GLAST Rocket Blast Off Successful - All About This Mission&#8230;With Launch Video</title>
	<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/06/glast-rocket-blast-off-successful-all-about-this-missionwith-launch-video/</link>
	<description>The latest in policital news and the war in Iraq</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: James Tankersley Jr</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/06/glast-rocket-blast-off-successful-all-about-this-missionwith-launch-video/#comment-191991</link>
		<author>James Tankersley Jr</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/06/glast-rocket-blast-off-successful-all-about-this-missionwith-launch-video/#comment-191991</guid>
					<description>I see that the GLAST telescope has been launched today. 

How much time might be required before analysis of GLAST data might indicate proof or rejection of Hawking Radiation theory?

This could be critical in determining the safety of the Large Hadron Collider, due to begin collisions later this year.

Unlike what CERN tells the public, the Large Hadron Collider Safety Assessment Group (LSAG) writes that current safety arguments are not valid proof of safety. Micro black holes might be created by the Large Hadron Collider, they might not evaporate, they might grow quickly and we have not been damaged by cosmic rays because cosmic rays pass harmlessly through Earth. CERN also tells the public that a new safety report has been completed, but so far the final report has not been released for review by world’s scientists.

The legal complaint before US Federal Court in Hawaii demands 4 months to review this safety report and a permanent injunction if safety can not be assured to within reasonable industry standards.  First hearing is scheduled for June 16, 2008.

Learn more at LHCFacts.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that the GLAST telescope has been launched today. </p>
<p>How much time might be required before analysis of GLAST data might indicate proof or rejection of Hawking Radiation theory?</p>
<p>This could be critical in determining the safety of the Large Hadron Collider, due to begin collisions later this year.</p>
<p>Unlike what CERN tells the public, the Large Hadron Collider Safety Assessment Group (LSAG) writes that current safety arguments are not valid proof of safety. Micro black holes might be created by the Large Hadron Collider, they might not evaporate, they might grow quickly and we have not been damaged by cosmic rays because cosmic rays pass harmlessly through Earth. CERN also tells the public that a new safety report has been completed, but so far the final report has not been released for review by world’s scientists.</p>
<p>The legal complaint before US Federal Court in Hawaii demands 4 months to review this safety report and a permanent injunction if safety can not be assured to within reasonable industry standards.  First hearing is scheduled for June 16, 2008.</p>
<p>Learn more at LHCFacts.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan</title>
		<link>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/06/glast-rocket-blast-off-successful-all-about-this-missionwith-launch-video/#comment-192005</link>
		<author>Juan</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://pat-dollard.com/2008/06/glast-rocket-blast-off-successful-all-about-this-missionwith-launch-video/#comment-192005</guid>
					<description>God damn that take off was sexy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God damn that take off was sexy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
