BTW, anyone else totally creeped-out by Barbara Boxer’s hands … especially when she’s talking?

Like Nosferatu’s hands.

“Our opponents aren’t even really debating us on that anymore,” she said Wednesday.
..
Well you stupid rancid c*nt boxer, in that statement have just admitted the ’science’ of global warming is subject to debate.
Funny, I did no know that scientific facts were determined by debate.

…………..

so much bullshit, so little time..

Charles Krauthammer wrote an editorial about this Global Warming Hysteria, saying that he was neither a believer nor a denier instead an agnostic in this matter, being that cooler heads could prevail.

This lunacy of such things like legislating what light bulbs we have to use, and Barry making mention of we can’t expect the rest of the world liking that we keep our homes at 70 degrees and drive SUVs. Well on this point Fuck You Barry, I’ll keep my home at 50 degrees and drive a Sherman Tank as long as I can afford to pay the bill you dick!

However instead of abysmal forms of legislature which are rife with consumer taxes, I believe we could do more to pollute less like building nuclear power plants to replace existing power plants that are nearing their service end. I’ve said it before as much as I hate to admit it the French are the best example of how efficient and clean nuclear power can be.

We need to demand more fuel efficient and cleaner burning diesel cars from auto manufacturers. New diesel technology is nothing like what the Greenies portray as billowing plumes of black smoke. I was just in England a month or two ago in England, I picked up the auto mag Top Gear for my flight back in the back half of the mag they break down all the manufacturers and almost every one has a diesel model in every range. For you SUV lovers they have a V8 Diesel Range Rover that has incredible mileage.

Sorry for rambling, but the irony here of all these stupid and wasteful energy bills are a direct result of the Democrats in cahoots with the Environmental Lobby obstructing the people’s desire for energy independence and national security. If we announce tomorrow we are removing all stops on drilling indigenously and building more refining capacity oil futures would tumble.

I was not aware that was something scientists ever ‘believe’

https://pat-dollard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif

(https://pat-dollard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)

A second interesting note is the existence of the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX). Chicago .. isn’t that Obama country? Want to bet there’s some linkage with the Obama campaign and CCX or it’s major supporters/investors such as the Joyce Foundation, Goldman Sachs, and (most likely through several shells) George Soros.

Conspiracy theory anone??

“…the scientific debate is over…”

I was not aware that was something scientists ever ‘believe’

Well, now you know.

Could you imagime waking up next to that woman every morning?

Gives me the Willies!!!!

$45T for something that may or may not be a problem.

Anyone seen the May ‘08 satellite temps? -0.180 degrees C

The 16 month ∆T of -0.774°C, is equal in magnitude to the generally agreed upon “global warming signal” of the last 100 years.

Jeez politians, look at the freakin data.

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/uah_may_08.png

“Well, now you know.”

Now I know what?

Any ’scientist’ that makes the claim that ‘the facts are in and the debate is over’ is not a scientist.
That’s true for both sides of the ‘debate’.
I do not believe that Climate Change as trademarked by Goracle is true. Primarily because it came from his mouth and he’s a liar but secondarily because he made the same claim; the facts are in and the debate is over.
The ‘other side’ doesn’t need to be going down the same road Gore travels.

You’ve made a giant leap. The scientific community has concluded that algore’s assertion suggesting global climate change(specifically warming)is a direct result of human behavior is false. The debate within the qualified community regarding algore’s position is over, whether you like it or not. A scientific assertion is either valid or invalid as ‘proven’ through the scientific method. algore was/is wrong about anthropomorphic climate change. I am glad that those in the community have finally stood up and closed the door to this debate. If you wish to beat a dead horse, be my guest.

I’m happy that wishful thinking works for you but there isn’t much evidence at all for your own unproven assertion that the door is closed on the debate.
Which is the only “dead horse” I’m beating here if any.

You’re just unread, try this to start, of course there’s much more out there::

https://pat-dollard.com/2008/05/its-officially-official-31000-scientists-officially-state-the-goracle-is-full-of-shit

I don’t intend to convince you. Likeminded idiots will continue to blindly follow the belief. As to your assertion that, “Any ’scientist’ that makes the claim that ‘the facts are in and the debate is over’ is not a scientist.” Clearly you know nothing of the scientific method. For example:

Scientists state that “water” is one atom of hydrogen and two atoms of oxygen. The facts are in and the debate is over.

Scientists state that the earth, is a sphere. The facts are in and the debate is over.

I could go on, but the point is clear. You make the mistake of equating algore’s postulate with true science.

Idiots will still chime in, but the scientific community has ended the debate. Thus it is with algore and anthropomorphic global warming.

I hope you like that horse.

I’m not “unread”. I had read it and 30K or whatever the number claiming the ’science’ is wrong obviously has had little effect because, as I pointed out previously, *the debate continues*. It continued just today in the U.S. Senate.
Now again… you and many others asserting the debate is over without proving your assertion is the same ‘tactic’ that the ‘warming advocates’ have used and continue to use.

“You make the mistake of equating algore’s postulate with true science.”

Thank you but I don’t postulate anything about algore’s postulate. Like the scientists in your example I *believe* it to be false.
But I do not make the more grievous mistake of equating whether or not *the debate is over* with whether or not the earth is a sphere.
That truly shows your own lack of comprehension of science.