Is The New York Times Biased In Reporting McCain & Hussein? - With Video
I’m not saying…I’m just asking….is the New York Times biased when it comes to reporting on these two candidates? Well, let’s just take one small example….hmmmm…aha! I’ve got it!
Recently, both John McCain and Barack Hussein the Liar Obama had their physicians release their medical records.
Check out what Brit Hume says…
So, McCain’s doctors released 1000 pages and said they would be holding a 90 minute news conference, and that they would answer all questions. After about 45 minutes, all questions stopped, the docs asked if there were any more, and nope…no more questions…the NY Slimes had this headline to say about that:
Then Hussein’s docs released a one page report on his health and that was all. This is how the NY Slimes headlined that story:
Bias? You tell me…?
At least I’ll admit mine…hell yes, I’m biased. Fuck Hussein the Liar!
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
Journalism is dead.
June 3rd, 2008 at 3:24 pmPeople still read the NY Times?
June 3rd, 2008 at 3:45 pmCan we have full disclosure of the NYTimes headline writer’s medical records followed by a Q&A?
And when can we expect (Pres.) Bill Clinton to release HIS medical records?
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:18 pmWho cares about the Slimes. They’re as relevant as…. well, they just aren’t any more.
June 3rd, 2008 at 5:08 pmTheir Obamaluvvin ways are digging their financial grave.
Good riddance.
The Times has been the biggest builders of the internet. That why they are going broke.
June 4th, 2008 at 3:31 am