Karl Rove Gives Hussein Both Barrels On Hannity - With Video
Interesting run here. I am somewhat disappointed, though not surprised that Hannity didn’t pick up on the actual heresy of the doctrine at Hussein’s church, instead focusing on just the plain and simple “radical insanity” of Rev. Jeremiah Wrong and Father Fagler (sic), or as Rove puts it “people like this”…I can see how that would be more damaging, being as how these would be more widely incendiary than the absence of sound Christian doctrine.
Nevertheless, Karl Rove pulls back both hammers (all 8 actually, in this case) and blows Barack “Hussein the Liar” Obama’s fukn head off.
Well, okay, maybe he just rips him an new one…
…(now visualize Jack Nicholson on the stand in “A Few Good Men”)…
“Either way, I don’t give a damn what Hussein thinks he is entitled to!”
Oh wait, wasn’t that Fagler spouting off about entitlements?
But good fukn grief, listen to what Colmes says…talking about America wanting change and McCain isn’t change just Bush third term, and so we might as well go with the dumbfuck radical black jesus heretic with all the radical associations, and no foreign policy experience, in fact, crazy foreign policy ideas, simply because we want change and McCain ain’t it.
What a freakin moron, I swear…
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
There’s a rumor floating around that Karl Rove acquired the alleged Michelle Obama rant video, and is saving it for a massive “October Surprise.” Given her past comments caught on tape, I’d say there’s a fair probability it does indeed exist. HRC is hedging her last hope on it being leaked earlier.
The Washinton Times source says that Rove is forming a massive warchest in a 527 organization, and is going to unleash not just a “Swift Boat” attack, but rather an entire “Armada” on Obama in the weeks right before the general election. Heard this on “The Savage Nation” while driving back from the library this evening.
What I do see is some pretty bad blood between the Clintons and the Obamas, and I believe HRC will sabotage the Obama campaign from behind the scenes.
June 2nd, 2008 at 7:35 pmIt does make for great theater to hear Rove put the left ‘in perspective’
…
… but Black Liberation Theology really does need to become the focus of attack.
When the ‘religious right’ and even Christian Dhimmis acquire an understanding of what exactly was being preached in Bambi’s ‘church’ they will finally understand WHY Bambi and his associates are dangerous. I copied this comment from another blog:
“…this is the core of Black Liberation Theology. Faith is worthwhile if it is useful. The object of the faith isn’t important, the usefulness of the faith itself to achieve some personal goal is what really matters.”
If there is a better definition of moral relativity I’m not aware of it and that is definitely not, as Bambi describes himself, Christian.
Here’s a deeply troubling 2004 interview with Bambi on religion:
http://falsani.blogspot.com/2008/04/barack-obama-2004-god-factor-interview.html
June 2nd, 2008 at 7:47 pmI am Glad Karl Rove Is one of the good Guys.
June 2nd, 2008 at 7:47 pmI agree with you.
I don’t see any way that Hilary Clinton will accept the VP nod, even if Obama gives her one.
There is already way too much bad blood between the two, and her acceptance of the post will only continue to confuse the democratic party.
Oh and I am sooooooooo pumped for this election. I think its gonna be a turkey-shoot. Rove has his talon’s in Obama, and he’s not gonna be able to get out.
June 2nd, 2008 at 7:51 pmThis election will be an interesting one for sure. I think anyone who believes a Republican doesnt stand a chance of winning the presidency will find out they were sorely mistaken this November. Some of the American people may have been foolish enough to vote the Dems into Majority status in the congress but i dont think there are enough idiots to vote Obama for President. he is too far left for 99% of this country and most people know that.
June 2nd, 2008 at 7:55 pmMost folks aren’t as sensitive to doctrinal error as we are. Like my Marine roomy gritting his teeth when somebody calls an AK a “machine gun”, most people just wouldn’t notice.
June 2nd, 2008 at 8:20 pmBoy Genius
June 2nd, 2008 at 8:30 pm“Most folks aren’t as sensitive to doctrinal error…”
Perhaps that’s true regarding guns but I disagree that is true when it comes to faith. Christianity especially.
June 2nd, 2008 at 9:17 pmMost folks are not aware of the doctrinal ‘heresy’ (as Bash put it) of Black Liberation Theology which would be as frightening to most Christian Americans as it is to me.
I also think Bambi knows this and quit that church hoping the ‘doctrinal errors’ would not become another ‘distraction’. He said he is a Christian and most will just believe that but Trinity did and does not preach Christian theology. It uses a Christ figure to promote moral relativity.
sully
June 2nd, 2008 at 10:28 pmThe point I was making was that most people, including most Christians, is that they don’t know enough about their own doctrine to even recognize it when somebody says something thoroughly heretical. Bash and I share a background in the Ministry so that sort of thing literally screams at us….you too it seems.
Bill O on Fox once claimed that this sort of doctrine(many paths to salvation) was perfectly mainstream in the Roman Catholic Church and Jerry Falwell, of all people, told Bill that he better let his Pope know about that…I enjoyed that.
“If there is a better definition of moral relativity I’m not aware of it and that is definitely not, as Bambi describes himself, Christian.”
yeah, moral unrelativity by your’s is quite high I have read, though I wouldn’t bet on your paradise merits, it’s like I would support Inquisition and Torquemada genocides.
Your defending your class privileges where moral enlightment has no place, just subjugation of the masses : definition of the muslim policy either !
Anyway, that isn’t of traditional philosophical inspiration
June 3rd, 2008 at 3:42 amAnother interesting point in this is……… what will the Christian Left do? The CL believes that any part of scripture can be throw away to achieve a political aspect or goal.
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:03 amThe Episcopalian, Methodist and many other churches are extremely liberal in their doctrine.
Are they liberal enough to support a man of Muslim decent from a racist church with terrorist ties?
Colmes is such an annoyance. He is the perfect willing accomplice to speaking nonsense and making idiotic comparisons.
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:33 amRove looks like a fat, balding version of my cousin Jimmy, who thinks there’s no difference between Reps and Dems.
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:54 amBlack Liberation Theology is the worst type of heresy. I have no doubt it is straight out of the bowels of hell and Satan must be laughing with delight at the fools who have bought into its message.
It has nothing to do with the sacrifice of Jesus Christ and everything to do with personal gain as witnessed by Jeremiah Wright and his 10,000 sq foot house, Obama and his self-serving dreams of stardom, and this Catholic-loathing Vanilla Ice clown of a priest.
It contains all the sins of the pandering phonies you see on TV ala Benny Hinn, and then adds a touch of incessant victimization and racist hate for the membership. It is no different that the “Rev” Jesse Jackson and preys on the stupidity and weakness of the masses. It must to enrich its leaders and to sustain itself, it must become more and more inciteful and outrageous.
Read the following scripture and see how many of the things that God hates fit this so-called BLT:
Proverbs 6:16-19
16 There are six things the LORD hates,
seven that are detestable to him:
17 haughty eyes,
a lying tongue,
hands that shed innocent blood,
18 a heart that devises wicked schemes,
feet that are quick to rush into evil,
19 a false witness who pours out lies
June 3rd, 2008 at 6:01 amand a man who stirs up dissension among brothers.
I mostly agree but they never will understand the ‘doctrinal differences’ unless the heresy goes mainstream, much like your own example of Falwell/O’Reilly.
Obama has been getting away with the totally false claim that ‘whitey just doesn’t understand the black church experience’.
No way Trinity is doctrinally the same as the vast majority of ‘black’ churches in America. And that, to me, is a much more compelling story than ‘G-D AMERIKKKA!’
Also, to dismiss the American church community with “most Christians…… don’t know enough about their own doctrine to even recognize it” is far too cynical.
June 3rd, 2008 at 9:32 amGalvanizing support from fellow Christians against heretic doctrine is going to be very important to defeating its finding its way into the White House.
Here’s an article that just went up on American Thinker:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_real_agenda_of_black_liber.html
It’s a start. Forward it to your Christian brothers and sisters.
June 3rd, 2008 at 9:56 amAlso, from the AT article:
“It serves not to reconcile and unite blacks with the larger cultural, but to keep them separate. Here, again, The Washington Post reports that “He [Wright] translated the Bible into lessons about…the misguided pursuit of ‘middle-classness.’”"
That misguided pursuit is ‘fundamental’ Marxist ideology presented in Alinsky’s ‘Rules For Radicals’…. essentially parroted by Obama in that commencement address at Wesleyan.
June 3rd, 2008 at 10:02 am