President Glenn Beck Wouldn’t Detain Terror Suspects - He’d Shoot Them In The Head
I am strangely attracted to that premise.
I am strangely attracted to that premise.
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
Just be sure we dip those bullets in pigs blood first.
June 26th, 2008 at 6:13 pmI like it… Bomb Iran now.
June 26th, 2008 at 6:22 pmGlenn is always going over the top. Unfortunately faced with the alternative I’d vote for over-the-top.
June 26th, 2008 at 6:33 pmPersonally, I’ve been saying take no prisoners (except high value targets) since the war began. For the ones we do take prisoner, tell no one and interrogate them in the back of a C-130. If they refuse to answer, open the rear cargo door.
Fuck the Dems and the trial lawyers. AND FUCK THE SCOTUS … in retrospect of today’s ruling of gun laws, the ruling shouldn’t have had to been made. All the SCOTUS did was reiterate a RIGHT we already have. That ruling is like receiving permission from my father-in-law to have sex with my wife, redundant.
June 26th, 2008 at 6:50 pmmy position from the beginning. if they’re not wearing a uniform, they’re either spies or saboteurs. Once any useful intelligence has been gleaned from them, take them out and shoot them.
June 26th, 2008 at 10:03 pmwhat he advocates will make us “just like the terrorists”.
funny thing is the libtards already think we are worse than the terrorists, so could shooting detainees on the spot and taking no prisoners make things worse?
If we want to win this war we need to do things the chicago way! its the only thing that will stop the muzzie advance to armageddon!
June 26th, 2008 at 11:50 pmreal easy answer folks, TOT them to whatever nations secret police we capture them in and let them interrogate them.
June 27th, 2008 at 2:30 am