Comments on: Trial Judge: ‘Don’t Dare Call It Rape Or Sexual Assult, Girlie’

By: Ed Stanowicz

Ed Stanowicz — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:16:58 +0000

Let me guess. This judge is a liberal Democrat, right???

By: Molly

Molly — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:19:46 +0000

The judge in this case is a self-righteous prick. Yes the defendant is entitled to a fair trial, but what about the victim’s rights?!

By: Kurt(the infidel)

Kurt(the infidel) — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:20:37 +0000

Has to be a liberal. liberal judges are also the ones who give sexual predators house arrest and probation instead of jail time. this ass should be barred

By: Dan (The Infidel)

Dan (The Infidel) — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:24:46 +0000

Time to impeach this fuck. What is he a Muslim..or just your ordinary run-of-the-mill, liberal dickhead?

By: Molly

Molly — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:24:57 +0000

Kurt

More like dis-barred.

I seriously hope my liberal D.A. cousin reconsiders becoming a judge one day. I’d hate to see what she would be like on the stand.

By: Kurt(the infidel)

Kurt(the infidel) — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:27:15 +0000

well barred from being a judge, which is right when speaking about other things, but you’re right Molly, in this case its dis-barred

By: 0311YutYut

0311YutYut — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:11:20 +0000

It does sound like something out of Pakistan or something, doesn’t it Dan? I bet the judge will have her stoned to death next for having pre-maritial sex.

By: Zeke Eagle

Zeke Eagle — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:40:20 +0000

So after I’ve opened my buck lock-back and extracted justice, I move the rapist not be allowed to use the term CASTRATED, your “Honor”.

By: Wulf''s girl

Wulf''s girl — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:55:57 +0000

this is ridiculous, are prosecuting attornies so stupid as to be unable to get around those two words? if you tell a jury the action that occurred that is more accurate and damning than a loaded word anyway. “I awoke to an unknown/unwelcome man penis penetrating my vagina without my permission or prior knowledge” is more descriptive and accurate than “he raped me” and alot less open to being torn down by the defense for being unclear, unspecific or subjective. That judge is violating the defendant’s right to face his accuser and the accuser’s right to free speech,(and yes he should be disbarred for his blatant disregard of both parties constitutional rights) yet being denied those two words is not an insurmountable obstacle to the prosecution as the Slaughter case clearly shows, the prosecution made a successful case despite the idiotic semantic restrictions.

By: Phil N Blanx

Phil N Blanx — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 23:13:48 +0000

Telling others what they can say or can’t say?
Where have I heard that before? Oh, that’s right, Barack (redacted) Obama.

By: mike3481

mike3481 — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:19:35 +0000

When you testify in court, you swear an oath to, “tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth”.

The Judge forbid her from doing that.

And because of that, the convicted rapist will get a new trial.

To say the Judge bought his Law degree at WalMart is an insult to WalMart.