Al Qaeda In Iraq Almost Extinct, Reduced To “Furtive Terrorists”

July 17th, 2008 Posted By Bash.

1

Let me just open this story with a quote from Osama Bin Laden from 2004:

“I now address my speech to the whole of the Islamic nation: Listen and understand. The issue is big and the misfortune is momentous. The most important and serious issue today for the whole world is this Third World War, which the Crusader-Zionist coalition began against the Islamic nation. It is raging in the land of the two rivers. The world’s millstone and pillar is in Baghdad, the capital of the caliphate.”

EPIC FAIL…the “Capital of the Caliphate” hath been stripped from you.

And we are not done hunting your ass down. Another quote, from “Pulp Fiction”:

“You hear me talkin’, hillbilly boy? I ain’t through with you. Not by a damned sight.”

COMBAT OUTPOST COPPER, Iraq - It’s quiet around here in farm country, south of Baghdad where al-Qaeda once held sway. Just months ago US foot patrols through the wheat fields nearby would regularly draw fire — if the soldiers managed first to elude al-Qaeda-planted roadside bombs.

“The difference is night and day,” says Capt. George Morris, 26. He and his soldiers in Bravo Company, 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division walked the area this week to visit a handful of farm families five miles east of the town of Latifiyah, not far from the Tigris River.

And it’s not just here. Throughout the country, al-Qaeda in Iraq, an insurgent organization thought to be affiliated with the global terrorist network but comprised mainly of Iraqis, has lost so much clout it is close to becoming irrelevant to the outcome of the war. The group has not been eliminated, however, leaving open the possibility of resurgence if the Iraqi government fails to follow up the military gains with civilian services like the irrigation that’s badly needed here.

When President Bush announced in January 2007 that he was sending more than 21,000 extra US combat troops to Iraq — mostly to the Baghdad area — as part of a new approach to fighting the insurgency, commanders said their No. 1 focus was degrading al-Qaeda’s ability to foment sectarian violence.

In the Latifiyah area, it’s not hard to see that goal has been achieved — an accomplishment that adds to the expectation that Bush will be able to further reduce US troop levels this fall.

Iraqi Army Capt. Jassim Hussein al-Shamari, whose men were part of Morris’ foot patrol, has one explanation for al-Qaeda’s fall.

“The people themselves will turn over the terrorists” if they show themselves, says al-Shamari. He’s speaking through an interpreter to Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Buchanan, a deputy commander of U.S. forces in the swath of once-violent territory stretching south of Baghdad from the Iranian border to Anbar province.

Buchanan sees it much the same way.

“The people are fed up with what they experienced under (al-Qaeda’s) presence,” Buchanan said, adding that the key to keeping the terrorist group down is having the government in Baghdad step in and provide more essential services, like the irrigation that farmers in the Latifiyah area find in short supply.

There is no available official estimate of the number of al-Qaeda fighters in Iraq. A US intelligence estimate early this year put it at a maximum of 6,000, although it probably has fallen far lower recently. Perhaps more importantly, US officers said in a series of Associated Press interviews over the past 10 days that so many al-Qaeda leaders have been captured or killed that its remnants are ineffective.

Col. Al Batschelet, chief of staff for the US command overseeing military operations in the Baghdad area, said that once the leadership began disappearing, lower-level technicians were pressed into duty.

That had the effect of accelerating the group’s decline: the technical experts were not as good at organizing and executing attacks, and by taking the lead they exposed themselves to being captured or killed. That, in turn, has left even less-technically skilled fighters to perform the specialized work of assembling bombs like al-Qaeda’s signature weapon, the vehicle-borne improvised explosive device, officers said.

The triggering mechanisms of al-Qaeda’s bombs have become less sophisticated and less effective, Batschelet said. Also, vehicle-borne IEDs used to contain hundreds of pounds of explosives, but they now typically are only 25 pounds.

“They just can’t get the material any more to do what they want to do,” Batschelet said. “But they still try. So we are unable to say that we’ve defeated their will” to continue their acts of violence.

Coming Soon?
1

Col. Bill Hickman, commander of 2nd Brigade, 101st Airborne Division, sees much the same thing in the neighborhoods of northwest Baghdad where his soldiers have witnessed a dramatic decline in violence this year.

“There are still disrupted cells of al-Qaeda in our area,” he said in an interview. “So they’re active, but they’re not as effective as they used to be. And their IEDs are small IEDs now.”

As for eliminating al-Qaeda entirely in Iraq, “That’s probably not achievable,” said Batschelet.

Although US and Iraqi forces have put enormous pressure on al-Qaeda by pursuing its leaders with relentless raids informed by improved intelligence this year, an even more important factor, arguably, was the decision by Sunni Arabs who had opposed the US occupation to ally with the Americans against al-Qaeda.

Whether those newfound allies — dubbed Sons of Iraq by their Americans benefactors — remain in opposition to the Sunni extremists, or decide to switch sides again, will tell much about al-Qaeda’s future in Iraq.

Either way, however, the moment seems to have passed when al-Qaeda could prevail in this conflict. It has been forced out of its original strongholds in Anbar province, and more recently it has lost Baghdad and the northern city of Mosul, although it still can pull off a deadly attack there and elsewhere.

Stephen Biddle, an Iraq watcher in Washington at the Council on Foreign Relations, said in an interview that without an urban hideout, al-Qaeda is reduced to the role of being “furtive terrorists.”

“If they don’t have an urban area with a friendly population that can enable them to operate” — and from which to recruit fighters — “then they’re going to be isolated terrorist actors,” Biddle said. Thus, eliminating them entirely need not be the goal of US commanders and the Iraqi government.

“That’s not central to the outcome of the war,” Biddle said.

(AP)


    • Young Americans Documentary
    • Learn More About Pat
    • blogroll

      • A Soldier's Perspective
      • Ace Of Spades
      • American Soldier
      • Ann Coulter
      • Attack Machine
      • Bill Ardolino
      • Bill Roggio
      • Black Five
      • Blonde Sagacity
      • Breitbart
      • Chicagoray
      • Confederate Yankee
      • Day by Day Cartoon
      • Euphoric Reality
      • Flopping Aces
      • Free Republic
      • Frontier Web Design
      • Hot Air
      • Hugh Hewitt
      • Ian Schwartz
      • Instapundit
      • Jules Crittenden
      • Little Green Footballs
      • Matt Sanchez
      • Michael Fumento
      • Michael Yon
      • Michelle Malkin
      • Military.com
      • Missiles And Stilletos
      • Move America Forward
      • Mudville Gazette
      • Pass The Ammo
      • Protest Warrior
      • Roger L. Simon
      • Sportsman's Outfit
      • Stop The ACLU
      • TCOverride
      • The Belmont Club
      • The Big God Blog
      • The Crimson Blog
      • The Daily Gut
      • The Drudge Report
      • The PoliTicking Timebomb
      • The Pundit Review
      • Veteran's Affairs Documentary

6 Responses

  1. tedders

    “Furtive Terrorists”

    They never were more than that, they never will be more than that in the future. When you have to hide behind women, children and masks it kind of defines your ideology as underhanded and against the will of the majority.

  2. doubleglock

    You know desparate people when they start using suicide victims as weapons. This they used from the beginning.

    When the sign read “mission acomplished” on the carrier, it was true - since then - only a mopping up - just like in Europe after WW2

  3. Goodbye Natalie

    Dollard nation,

    :neutral: I need help! :neutral:

    I been racking my brains for about 24 hours now trying to think of any successes of modern liberalism concerning policy. I can’t even come up with one. I don’t know if I am having a memory block or what but it seems to me everything they’ve touched the last 40 years has turned to shit besides the libbie power broker’s bank accounts. Education, health care, business, social programs, I mean everything an abysmal failure.

    Now I know they’ve been highly successful at recruiting more rubes, slackers, American haters, Charlie Manson types, and other deviants but I am talking about something you could measure of value.

    Surely there is some success out there they can claim.

    Anybody think of one?

  4. Dan (The Infidel)

    Liberalism used to mean all sides of a view were discussed, argued, and allowed to speak without being shouted down.

    That was at one time the standard in education. Problem was the liberal view towards life, politics and education also let in the views of communists, trotsky-ites and Marxists; who then took over the system and morphed that liberal ideal and institution(s) into “progressive” (read Marxist-socialist) institutions and ideals.

    40-50 years ago being a liberal meant being anti-Jim Crowe and open-minded towards everything else…because all views were on the table for intelligent discussion.

    Not so anymore. All the real libs have become conservative or have retired into obscurity.

    I saw the fall of real liberalism begin in about 1963 following the death of JFK and the 1963 School prayer decision by the august body of oligarchs at the S.C.

    So what have libs (progressives) accomplished since that morphing took place in the post-liberal years? Not a damn thing.

  5. deathstar

    Listen to me you cracker bitches, the surge will not work, it aint working, I know what Im talking about because I am the Obamamessiah.

  6. Goodbye Natalie

    :arrow: Dan,

    I saw the fall of real liberalism begin in about 1963 following the death of JFK and the 1963 School prayer decision by the august body of oligarchs at the S.C.>

    Yea, I would agree. Though I’m a little young to remember the 60’s since I was born in 1960, I certainly remember the 70’s which Obama is trying really hard to return to.

    I was thinking just about the time Madalyn Murray O’Hare was starting her pilgrimage to hell, things begin to turn. Being that I lived in one of those God-fearing red states, the really backwards God-fearing type that Leninists really love to hate, it didn’t become prevalent until the early ’70s in my neck of the woods.

    But I could make a pretty good case I think that Liberalism (modern day) has it’s real roots in the Hugo Black SCOTUS starting sometime soon after WWII; when Hugo and his cronies perverted the term “wall of separation between church and state” that Jefferson used back in 1802 to assure the Danbury Baptist Church they were in no danger of government interference. It just took about 15-20 years to manifest itself.

    Anyway, thanks for the input. I still can’t think of a damn thing the secular leftists have given us that hasn’t been a dismal failure.

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen::neutral::twisted::arrow::shock::smile::???::cool::evil::grin::idea::oops::razz::roll::wink::cry::eek::lol::mad::sad::!::?::beer::beer: