Iran Insists On High-Level Iraq Talks With U.S.
BAGHDAD (AP) - Iran wants to renew high-level talks with U.S. officials on security in Iraq, insisting that discussions take place between ambassadors and not lower-level functionaries, Iraqi officials said Monday.
The Iranians also want a clear-cut agenda for the meeting, which the American side has not yet provided, according to Sami al-Askari, an adviser to Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and a member of parliament. Three Iraqi officials confirmed his account, speaking on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak to the press.
There was no immediate comment or confirmation from Iran’s Foreign Ministry or state media.
A May 27 meeting concerning security in Iraq between U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker and his Iranian counterpart, Hassan Kazemi Qomi, broke a 27-year diplomatic freeze between the two countries.
A planned Dec. 18 meeting between Iranian and American security, military and diplomatic experts was canceled a few days before it was to be held. At the time, Iranian officials said it was a scheduling problem while U.S. officials referred questions to the Iraqi Foreign Ministry.
American officials have since pointed out that Dec. 18 was the day Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice made a surprise visit to Iraq, which forced the postponement of the meeting. For security reasons, they said they could not disclose Rice’s arrival date ahead of time.
Since then, top Iranian officials in Baghdad have asked their Iraqi counterparts to push the Americans to hold a fourth-round of talks between Crocker and Qomi, an Iranian official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity. The two last met in August, shortly after the first and only meeting of low-level experts, which produced no concrete results.
Iran has long been accused by Washington of training, arming and funding Shiite extremists inside Iraq to kill American troops.
But in the past month, U.S. officials have said Tehran appears to have slowed or halted the flow of illegal weapons across the frontier. Iran has denied the arms smuggling accusations, insisting that it is doing its best to help stabilize its embattled western neighbor.
Crocker told reporters during a Sunday briefing in Baghdad that he would be willing to meet Qomi again, but said no date had been set for a meeting at any level.
“I would be open to this. We could do it at the experts’ level or we could do it at my level. I would definitely see that as a possibility,” he said. “We’re looking at what we might talk about, which I think is the first and necessary step before deciding who talks about it.”
Crocker said there were “some signs, some indicators that the Iranians are using some influence to bring down violence from extremist Shiia militias.” They included a drop in the number of attacks that use high-tech shaped charge bombs, which American officials allege are made in Iran.
“How lasting a phenomenon that will be, and how Iran will define and play its role in Iraq in 2008 will be very important to the long-term future of the country,” he said.
Crocker said any talks with the Iranians would focus solely on Iraqi security and would not extend into the explosive issue of U.S. accusations that Iran is trying to develop nuclear weapons.
Al-Askari said a top Iranian diplomat complained to him in recent days that U.S. officials are not providing enough information about what a new round of talks at any level will achieve.
“They told us that the Americans are vague and that they want to know what is the goal, what is the purpose of these talks,” al-Askari said. “They said they do not want to talk on the level of experts—that at a minimum, it should be at the ambassadorial level or even higher.”
Al-Askari added that the Iranians were also upset that although they contributed to the improving security situation in Iraq, U.S. officials have not done enough to acknowledge it.
“The Iranians will not stand anymore going to talk with the U.S. one day, and the next day watch the Americans speak badly about them in the press—by saying Iran is supporting militias and supplying weapons,” he said.
The Iranian Embassy in Baghdad was closed Monday for the Eid al-Adha holiday.
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
Iran should change their name to the more appropriate Iwant.
December 24th, 2007 at 12:05 pmWe’re not at war with iran, yet. So what’s to talk about? What part of stay on your side of the border don’t these miserable, fucking iranians understand? Come over to Iraq and you’re going to get killed. And that Crocker seems to be too much a wimp.
December 24th, 2007 at 12:27 pmThe top rag head mullah in Iran must be getting a little nervous, along with his munchkin sock puppet.
December 24th, 2007 at 1:21 pmFormer House Speaker Newt Gingrich delivered the following remarks to a Jewish National Fund meeting Nov. 15 at the Selig Center:
And so you have an Iranian regime which is cited annually as the leading supporter of state terrorism in the world. Every year the State Department says that. It’s an extraordinary act of lucidity on the part of an institution which seeks to avoid it as often as possible.
And you have Gen. Petraeus come to the U.S. Congress and say publicly in an open session, “The Iranians are waging a proxy war against Americans in Iraq.”
I was so deeply offen ded by this, it’s hard for me to express it without sounding irrational. I’m an Army brat. My dad served 27 years in the infantry. The idea that an American general would come to the American Congress, testify in public that our young men and women are being killed by Iran, and we have done nothing, I find absolutely abhorrent.
December 25th, 2007 at 12:22 amLet’s send Barack, he has a unique insight to these people.
We have to start thinking of our own benefit here; what do we gain from talking with Iran? Takiyya? No thanks. If anything we should talk to them by grabbing them by the belt buckle and getting in their face and telling them to cut the shit before bombs start magically going off in Tehran. I’m sure we have some of those shaped charges that Iran is supplying the jihadis, how about some of them going off in Iran? Turnabout is fair play.
December 25th, 2007 at 12:53 amAnd what would Ahmedwithadickinhisass be serving with these high-level talks? Main course: Lots of kitma and tagyiya. Maybe a light snack of hudna?
December 25th, 2007 at 11:17 am